Thing missing in your analysis is understanding natural timing to everything limited to remain evolving forward now. Your whole arugment is based on the assumption time changes everything.LowIQTrash » 23 Mar 2023, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Retarded Democrats cheer the BLS' monthly job numbers report showing Bidumb's "strong economy."
What few people know is that, assuming the numbers aren't intentionally fraudulent, the methdology/heuristics is fatally flawed. What the BLS presumably does as part of its data collection is scour sites like Indeed and LinkedIn looking at the # job openings.
A) According to a small business lending firm's poll of 1000 hiring managers (this blurb came from WSJ) almost half of the listings aren't for "real" positions. They're there to give potential investors the ILLUSION "muh company is still GROE-ing, plz gif me munney!"
https://www.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell ... are_button
B) Jobs, assuming they are real, are frequently posted on multiple sites. And I severely doubt BLS employees have the intellect or motivation to account for duplicates (I assume the easiest method is to poll HR or hiring managers and ask how many sites they post on then do an adjustment - crude but simple)
C) Assuming the demand for labor is outstripping supply, you should see a sustained increase in wages (this is not happening). All of those so called "wage gains" were eviscerated by inflation.
D) Companies are running with fewer personnel than ever before; this means aggregate worker income is dropping despite hourly wages rising. Many current employees have to do the jobs of 1.5-2 former employees and I can confirm this based on talking with my (poor) W2 friends, lol.
If that's too difficult to understand, picture this:
So let's say in small town **** in Arkansas, there used to be 3000 employed back in 2019. Thanks to the globalist/banker/international finance cabal unleashing a flu so they can scare you into injecting yourself with their serum, many have not returned to work for various reasons. The structural shift (dysfunction) now means only 2500 are working in ****, AR.
Those 2500 need a 20% wage increase to match what those 3000 earned (add in another 20% for real inflation).
1.2 × 1.2 = 1.44
(44% - it's multiplicative not additive you retards)
How many employees have gotten a 44% raise in their RESPECTIVE positions since 2020?
"Yippee! Mcdonalds hired for $12/hr back in 2011 when 1 BR was $700/mo, now they're hiring for $16/hr in 2023 when 1 BR is $1400/mo!!!!!11111"
Great, you can now skip your Labor Econ class.
Can't stand having someone expose your obvious ignorance, can you?peepee » 26 Mar 2023, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑![]()
...what i wrote was: "if it wasn't for strawmen, red herrings and republic#nt-puppetrhetoric this ^^^ phony [and monetary ignoramus] (zeets) is silent!"...
![]()
...of course you're never silent!!!.... you obviously have endlessstrawmen, red herrings and republic#nt-puppet-rhetoric to
spew [in monetary ignorance], you semi-literate $hit-spewer!!!
I'm glad to hear it, Pook.
Self appointed, pook - thanks for axing. And it would be DEFENDER, Pook - not "defendant."Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Just curious to learn who elected YOU the defendant of those whose comments have been misunderstood?
You mean that time I made you cry like a kid who dropped her ice cream, Pook?Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe you should try to get over the fact that I exposed you as a liar and a punk and mind your own **** business!
Sound fair, tough guy?



Glad we agree your critique had all the dignity of a dead horse, Pookie.
You couldn't use your "personal growth" to cure a ham, asshole.Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm glad to hear it, Pook.
Always good to see I've helped someone with their personal growth
Self appointed, pook - thanks for axing. And it would be DEFENDER, Pook - not "defendant."
English, Pookie - get you some.
You mean that time I made you cry like a kid who dropped her ice cream, Pook?![]()
![]()
![]()
I still laugh at that series of events, where you got all butthurt that I didn't keep my word, because you were too stupid to see that I kept my word.
You took the HOOOOOOK...![]()
I use a smoke house for that, Pookie. Do you have access to any dictionaries?Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You couldn't use your "personal growth" to cure a ham, asshole.
It's odd that I was the one laughing my *** off and you were the one crying like a girl, Pookie. Given your "big win, I mean.Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Must have been really tough admitting that I proved that I couldn't be bullied by a punk like you while forcing you to admit I wasn't the loser and liar you are! I had no need to care about how humiliated a liar gets by establishing my honesty.
Wouldn't it be lovely if you could get one other person on either side of the aisle to cosign that narrative, Pookie?Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Or maybe you just can't handle the fact that someone here exposed you as a lying scumbag who's jealous of others who are far more successful than a loser like you?
So keep thinking you're straight, OK?


SJConspirator » 26 Mar 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ OP and SJC : [puppet] Democrats suck
Peepee: your puppet republic#nt monetary ignoramuses suck as badly as the puppet democ#nt monetary ignoramuses
SJC gently sobbing in the corner [in monetary ignorance]: STFU Peepee! We [puppet-sucking] republic#nt monetary ignoramuses hate you!!![]()
Do you always laugh your *** off when you get it handed to you on a silver platter? Maybe a shrink could help you accept that.Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I use a smoke house for that, Pookie. Do you have access to any dictionaries?
It's odd that I was the one laughing my *** off and you were the one crying like a girl, Pookie. Given your "big win, I mean.
In YOUR narrative, it's almost like you didn't get pantsed.![]()
Wouldn't it be lovely if you could get one other person on either side of the aisle to cosign that narrative, Pookie?
Maybe you should start a tribute thread - see if you can get some sob sisters to go along with your My Little Pony version of history.
Just remember, Pookie: You're good enough, you're smart enough, and doggone it - people like you (are morons).![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Asked the guy who didn't comprehend the op - the guy who accused the OP of being a democrat, when he started the post with "Retarded Democrats."Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you always laugh your *** off when you get it handed to you on a silver platter?
This just proves AGAIN that you're retar-ted. I'm the admin on THIS site, ya **** idiot!Zeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Go find another forum to try to fool with your tough-guy attitude, ******.

That your biggest achievement in your miserable life?Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ This just proves AGAIN that you're retar-ted. I'm the admin on THIS site, ya **** idiot!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

No, queer - it's just what makes your suggestion I go elsewhere stupid.
No doubt a schlub like you could never imagine yourself having the kind of successful career I made for myself, so you have no choice but to continue lying about it. And I've run FIVE successful businesses in my time asshole, NONE that involved my father from the onset, and my last two businesses were started up after my father passed away. It was MY NAME on the contracts, deeds, business registration certificates I sent to Roadkill which you're now proving how you lied about accepting that evidence when you challenged me.Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2023, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ No, queer - it's just what makes your suggestion I go elsewhere stupid.
There's no **** way you ever ran a business with such a mediocre brain, fruitcake. You sent my boy proof of yo DADDY'S accomplishments.
Ah, jeez, I got you off bragging on your fake career again?Zeets2 » 27 Mar 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No doubt a schlub like you could never imagine yourself having the kind of successful career I made for myself,
Believe what you want, dickhead!Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Ah, jeez, I got you off bragging on your fake career again?
Get to work, you filthy, lazy ape.peepee » 23 Mar 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...much more importantly than this is the fact that everyone involved in this ^^^^ $tory is a f@cking monetary ignoramus who works their gaping hole about some 'illion-dollar economy' absent a clue as to the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar!... wordle...
Said the gay poseur, while responding to my properly posted images.Zeets2 » 27 Mar 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑
And it sure as hell doesn't say much about your moderator skills when you don't even know how to post an image,