Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Trump warns of death and destruction if indicted. You won't see this on fox news.
Trump warns of death and destruction if indicted. You won't see this on fox news.
By Vegas
24 Mar 2023 12:03 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Mar 2023 12:10 pm
his words will not hold water. totally an unreliable person.Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Costello also stated that he sent the hundreds of E-mails that corroborates that Michael Cohen is lying to the Manhatten DA's office and that Bragg with-held exculpatory evidence from the grand jury .....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/19/politics ... index.html
WashingtonCNN — Attorney Robert Costello, once a legal adviser to Trump attorney Michael Cohen, will appear Monday before the New York grand jury investigating the former President Donald Trump’s alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to adult film star Stormy Daniels.Costello, who has represented Trump allies like Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani, told CNN he is appearing before the grand jury at the request of Trump’s legal team.
26 Mar 2023 12:11 pm
What law was broken even if that is true ?jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ it proves that everything was done as an order from trump.
26 Mar 2023 12:25 pm
His words might not but the fact that Cohen waived his client/attorney privelege with Costello and that Costello has the goods on Cohen in the form of hundreds of E-mails will hold water in a court of law when Trump eventually files a civil suit against the Manhatten DA's office for with-holding exculpatory evidence from the grand jury which will end Bragg's career ....no matter how you try and frame it otherwise .....jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ his words will not hold water. totally an unreliable person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WashingtonCNN — Attorney Robert Costello, once a legal adviser to Trump attorney Michael Cohen, will appear Monday before the New York grand jury investigating the former President Donald Trump’s alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to adult film star Stormy Daniels.Costello, who has represented Trump allies like Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani, told CNN he is appearing before the grand jury at the request of Trump’s legal team.
Now what was the reasoning for the DOJ to not pursue this matter against Trump ?
Because all trump has to do is state that he did what he did to save his marriage .....
End of story ....
Secondly do you think that blackmailing a potential Presidential candidate for something that happened 10 years prior is lawful?
lol.
26 Mar 2023 12:35 pm
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... estigation
26 Mar 2023 12:52 pm
hahahahaZeets2 » 26 Mar 2023, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ You're truly hysterical!
Do you REALLY think that "SEEKING" a reimbursement of anything from anyone is evidence of anything besides your own ignorance?
----------------------------------------------
April 30: Daniels sues Trump for defamation over a tweet in which he wrote that her claims that she was threatened in 2011 were a "total con job."May 2: Rudy Giuliani, newly hired as Trump's personal attorney, makes the startling admission that the president reimbursed Cohen for the $130,000 payment.May 3: Trump tweets that Cohen "received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA."
26 Mar 2023 1:15 pm
Jerra can you calm your TDS for a bit and realize what Bragg is doing and why legal experts from both sides are not happy with his antics ....?
huh?
Do you even have a clue?
beyond your "get Trump" fervor?
26 Mar 2023 1:28 pm
wow!
did you say the thing when cohen was sentenced???
who did everything on orders from trump.
-----------------------------------------------
August 2018: Cohen pleads guilty to eight charges of tax evasion, fraud and campaign finance violations in connection to his payments to Daniels and McDougal, which the Department of Justice called an attempt "to influence the 2016 presidential election."
- During his guilty plea, Cohen says in federal court he was directed to violate campaign law at the direction of an unnamed candidate. That same candidate directed him to pay $130,000 in hush money, which the candidate later reimbursed.
- He is sentenced to three years in prison.
26 Mar 2023 1:31 pm
Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Jerra can you calm your TDS for a bit and realize what Bragg is doing and why legal experts from both sides are not happy with his antics ....?
huh?
Do you even have a clue?
beyond your "get Trump" fervor?
https://apnews.com/article/trump-stormy ... e21f87ab0b
26 Mar 2023 1:33 pm
trump lied then and lies now. cohen went to jail because he acted on trump's instructions and also because trump is a liar.Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Jerra can you calm your TDS for a bit and realize what Bragg is doing and why legal experts from both sides are not happy with his antics ....?
huh?
Do you even have a clue?
beyond your "get Trump" fervor?
26 Mar 2023 1:37 pm
Jerra can you calm your TDS for a bit and realize what Bragg is doing and why legal experts from both sides are not happy with his antics ....?
huh?
Do you even have a clue?
beyond your "get Trump" fervor?
answer the question ......
Your link makes no mention of the consequences of what Bragg's antics would mean to the judicial system if he does get away with his attempt to set a legal precedent. ...
so, what would be the precedent ....
26 Mar 2023 1:44 pm
Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Jerra can you calm your TDS for a bit and realize what Bragg is doing and why legal experts from both sides are not happy with his antics ....?
huh?
Do you even have a clue?
beyond your "get Trump" fervor?
answer the question ......
Your link makes no mention of the consequences of what Bragg's antics would mean to the judicial system if he does get away with his attempt to set a legal precedent. ...
so, what would be the precedent ....
braggs is not stupid.
the case will probably be about trump lied in the past and cohen was convicted because of those lies.
26 Mar 2023 1:47 pm
The only proof they have of this is from Cohen ....jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ trump lied then and lies now. cohen went to jail because he acted on trump's instructions and also because trump is a liar.
and Cohen's testimony would be totally destroyed by Costello's communications with him via E-mail ......
in other words ....
Bragg may get an indictment but it would not stick upon appeal ......because Michael **** Cohen and his testimony can easily be proven as being highly unreliable. ....
Considering he has already been charged once with lying to congress.....oops.
26 Mar 2023 1:56 pm
costello will not be a viable witness because he is connected to trump and he is not impartial.Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ The only proof they have of this is from Cohen ....
and Cohen's testimony would be totally destroyed by Costello's communications with him via E-mail ......
in other words ....
Bragg may get an indictment but it would not stick upon appeal ......because Michael **** Cohen and his testimony can easily be proven as being highly unreliable. ....
Considering he has already been charged once with lying to congress.....oops.
26 Mar 2023 1:58 pm
the person who is not reliable is costello.Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ The only proof they have of this is from Cohen ....
and Cohen's testimony would be totally destroyed by Costello's communications with him via E-mail ......
in other words ....
Bragg may get an indictment but it would not stick upon appeal ......because Michael **** Cohen and his testimony can easily be proven as being highly unreliable. ....
Considering he has already been charged once with lying to congress.....oops.
only a dummy would believe that cohen paid daniels on his own whim.
26 Mar 2023 2:05 pm
Hahahaha.jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ braggs is not stupid.
the case will probably be about trump lied in the past and cohen was convicted because of those lies.
Bragg is stupid.
because his whole **** case is hinged upon Michael Cohen....
because there is no other evidence against Trump ......
you obviously forgot that Bragg stated in his first attempt at this ...that there was not sufficient evidence to charge trump .....
and Bragg had all of Trump's Financials ....at the time.
And could find nothing of significance ....to charge him with ...not even a misdemeanor. ...
so, what does this stupid idiot DA do.....
He doubles down with his partisan stupidity because he just like you suffers from TDS ....and hinges his whole case on the testimony of the proven liar and felon Cohen.
and now is trying to manufacture a felony out of thin **** air .......so he can get that pic of Trump in handcuffs so it can be used in the coming Democrat attack ads going into 2024.
And which Bragg also **** knows would be overturned upon appeal ....
it's called political lawfare ....and a waste of our taxpayer money .....
26 Mar 2023 2:12 pm
Hahahaha.jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ costello will not be a viable witness because he is connected to trump and he is not impartial.
Costello's evidence against Cohen in the form of 100's of E-mails is totally viable regardless of his connection to Trump in a court of law ....
and you still haven't given a reason why Bragg with-held that evidence from the grand jury....which basically sums up how flimsy his case is .....
and You made me spill my scotch by trying to profess that Cohen is some how impartial ....
LMAO.
26 Mar 2023 2:19 pm
this case is so strong you are shaking in your boots;Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Hahahaha.
Bragg is stupid.
because his whole **** case is hinged upon Michael Cohen....
because there is no other evidence against Trump ......
you obviously forgot that Bragg stated in his first attempt at this ...that there was not sufficient evidence to charge trump .....
and Bragg had all of Trump's Financials ....at the time.
And could find nothing of significance ....to charge him with ...not even a misdemeanor. ...
so, what does this stupid idiot DA do.....
He doubles down with his partisan stupidity because he just like you suffers from TDS ....and hinges his whole case on the testimony of the proven liar and felon Cohen.
and now is trying to manufacture a felony out of thin **** air .......so he can get that pic of Trump in handcuffs so it can be used in the coming Democrat attack ads going into 2024.
And which Bragg also **** knows would be overturned upon appeal ....
it's called political lawfare ....and a waste of our taxpayer money .....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For about two weeks, Cohen, according to his own account, slow-walked the deal, as he worked out the details for making the payment. During that time, Daniels became nervous, believing Trump was stalling until after the election when he might then refuse to pay. On the evening of October 25—two weeks before Election Day—Howard sent Cohen a text: “Keith calling you urgently. We have to coordinate something on the matter he’s calling you about or its [sic] could look awfully bad for everyone.” Cohen and Davidson spoke at least twice soon after. The next morning, Cohen had two phone conversations with Trump. Afterward, Cohen instructed his bank, First Republic, to open an account in the name of Essential Consultants, explaining this was a real estate consulting firm. (He had dumped Resolution Consultants as the vehicle for the Stormy Daniels payoff.) He then transferred $130,000 from his home equity line of credit into the account.
26 Mar 2023 2:23 pm
Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Hahahaha.
Costello's evidence against Cohen in the form of 100's of E-mails is totally viable regardless of his connection to Trump in a court of law ....
and you still haven't given a reason why Bragg with-held that evidence from the grand jury....which basically sums up how flimsy his case is .....
and You made me spill my scotch by trying to profess that Cohen is some how impartial ....
LMAO.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-tru ... -attorney/
26 Mar 2023 2:45 pm
Your assessment is not tied to reality ....jerrab » 26 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ this case is so strong you are shaking in your boots;
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For about two weeks, Cohen, according to his own account, slow-walked the deal, as he worked out the details for making the payment. During that time, Daniels became nervous, believing Trump was stalling until after the election when he might then refuse to pay. On the evening of October 25—two weeks before Election Day—Howard sent Cohen a text: “Keith calling you urgently. We have to coordinate something on the matter he’s calling you about or its [sic] could look awfully bad for everyone.” Cohen and Davidson spoke at least twice soon after. The next morning, Cohen had two phone conversations with Trump. Afterward, Cohen instructed his bank, First Republic, to open an account in the name of Essential Consultants, explaining this was a real estate consulting firm. (He had dumped Resolution Consultants as the vehicle for the Stormy Daniels payoff.) He then transferred $130,000 from his home equity line of credit into the account.
You can't even answer a simple question ....
like ...
why did Bragg with-hold exculpatory evidence from the grand jury if Bragg's case is so strong like you believe.....?
Bragg commited the most vile offense that a DA could possibly do .....which is the Spoliation of evidence.....
Spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding.
26 Mar 2023 3:08 pm
Majik » 26 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Hahahaha.
Costello's evidence against Cohen in the form of 100's of E-mails is totally viable regardless of his connection to Trump in a court of law ....
and you still haven't given a reason why Bragg with-held that evidence from the grand jury....which basically sums up how flimsy his case is .....
and You made me spill my scotch by trying to profess that Cohen is some how impartial ....
LMAO.
https://youtu.be/_pFq3bbmTJ0
Who is online
In total there are 5129 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 5103 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: Adsbot, DuckDuckBot, proximic, CriteoBot, okhttp, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Baiduspider, curl/7, ADmantX, Googlebot