6 degrees of self deception has 31 positions of ancestry following the same narrative ancestrally forward from here. Need I break that down for you again?peepee » 27 Mar 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ ...he's a cosmic/spiritualist rap artist!... he also speaks in tongues... he uses us as a test market focus group for his lyrical stylings...
Just another example of how President Trump lives rent-free in the otherwise empty heads of every Democrat.Mrkelly » 26 Mar 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I will bet anyone 100 greenies that tRump goes back to twitter by the end of January of next year
I do and have followed him on both for a few years
on “truth social” he has 5 million followers
on twitter, he has 87 million followers, and he doesn’t even post on it![]()
I really don’t think that his ego will be able to take it come election silly season
I think he will **** on his new platform, and go for the ego boost of being the darling of twitter again
any takers?
so … no bet?Zeets2 » 27 Mar 2023, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Just another example of how President Trump lives rent-free in the otherwise empty heads of every Democrat.
So tell me, libby. Does it help you to assuage your guilt over **** up the country with your idiotic Biden vote?
Why would anyone care to bet on such an idiotic obsession of yours?
the bet is designed to keep a false narrative going forward. bet or dare create the same set of projected senarios all true or false narratives have historically governing tomorrows in figurative speech with living never exceeding series parallel displacement of current ancestors evolving forward now.
He doesn't have to post on twitter ....Mrkelly » 26 Mar 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I will bet anyone 100 greenies that tRump goes back to twitter by the end of January of next year
I do and have followed him on both for a few years
on “truth social” he has 5 million followers
on twitter, he has 87 million followers, and he doesn’t even post on it![]()
I really don’t think that his ego will be able to take it come election silly season
I think he will **** on his new platform, and go for the ego boost of being the darling of twitter again
any takers?
The odds are not in my favor, so I'm out. I have no control over what Trump does. He very well might go back to posting on Twitter.Mrkelly » 26 Mar 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I will bet anyone 100 greenies that tRump goes back to twitter by the end of January of next year
I do and have followed him on both for a few years
on “truth social” he has 5 million followers
on twitter, he has 87 million followers, and he doesn’t even post on it![]()
I really don’t think that his ego will be able to take it come election silly season
I think he will **** on his new platform, and go for the ego boost of being the darling of twitter again
any takers?
nope … no one is posting on his twitter accountMajik » 27 Mar 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't have to post on twitter ....
he has 87 million followers who do it for him .....on a daily basis ...
Trust me - if the system had allowed a billion, that was the plan. You nailed it.Jantje_Smit » 27 Mar 2023, 4:04 am » wrote: ↑ You sure have a lot of greenies.. I'm looking at that and it made me wonder, what happens when you get to a billion greenies, is the programming up to that or will there be a crash... like they thought would happen with the y2k bug... I'm still pissed off about that one..
Because he does not need to post on his own account to utilize Twitter.......or have a presence on Twitter .....Mrkelly » 27 Mar 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ nope … no one is posting on his twitter account
last post on his twitter was his
That’s why I feel comfortable making the bets (if there were any)
A better bet would have been whether he would allow his ego to get himself banned again if he did resume posting on twitter .....Mrkelly » 27 Mar 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ That’s why I feel comfortable making the bets (if there were any)
Good idea for when he goes backMajik » 27 Mar 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ A better bet would have been whether he would allow his ego to get himself banned again if he did resume posting on twitter .....
I think it would depend upon the circumstances ....Mrkelly » 27 Mar 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ Good idea for when he goes back
A BET part two
I doubt musk would ban him
or maybe he would take a vote on twitter to see if he should
There's the rub. This ^ is what you are not taking into account. You are not putting yourself in Trump's position.Mrkelly » 27 Mar 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑
I doubt musk would ban him
or maybe he would take a vote on twitter to see if he should
Finally, a betCannonpointer » 27 Mar 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ There's the rub. This ^ is what you are not taking into account. You are not putting yourself in Trump's position.
Trump is cagey. He is going to sniff it out from every angle. Just returning to twitter in the first place makes MUSK, not Trump, the protagonist. Look what Musk did - he ALLOWED Trump to post. How the **** are you going to predicate your position on Trump's ego, and NOT take Trump's ego into consideration?
Then there are the howls of joy and derision - the raucus knee-slapping of Trump's enemies - when Musk turns around and bans Trump - a possibility that Trump is absolutely going to consider before going back on twitter.
From Trump's ego-driven perspective, there are one **** of a lot of liabilities to returning - no matter HOW **** juicy that following is. You're betting the fox's appetite will overcome his wariness. I don't think you understand the fox.
I'll take your bet, ***, and give ya ten to one odds.
All these *** should have the balls to give you odds.
I don't do any social media.Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ All these *** should have the balls to give you odds.
This website is social media.Deezer Shoove » 27 Mar 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't do any social media.
I think people that do are needy or conceited.
At least 90% are one or the other.
Since I am humbly above such flaws, I have no interest.
Well, maybe a little now that you have picked up the challenge. ;)
I leaning your way on this one for sure. Your analogy was spot on.