I also am not sure how I do it, and I also am certain that it helps to not engage in western infamy.Jantje_Smit » 28 Mar 2023, 2:20 am » wrote: ↑ All nonsense, it's @Ronjul that makes the wealth trickle down, I'm not sure how and why but it helps if you're not a child groomer and tranny supporter...
The reason I'm just wild about Elizibeth Warren, (other than her claiming Indian ancestry which any well bred Oakie or Ozarker also claims Indian princesses in their distant bloodline) is watching Lizzie bash on the rich folks, especially those fat cat bankers.Xavier_Onassis » 27 Mar 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is an interesting and at least
partially correct observation
Xavier_Onassis » 27 Mar 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is an interesting and at least
partially correct observation
You're a bigger idiot than realized.Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Trickle down is the better description. The words "supply side" serve only to baffle and confuse people.
Supply side economics suggests that the wrong kind of economics would be DEMAND side economics.
When a person thinks outside a box from within an idea their body isn't self contained to an ancestral cycle of time living eternally separated now and their intellect is a free spirit not limited to genetic adapting in space forward here as the only time oneself exists at all.Ronjul » 10 Jul 2023, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I also am not sure how I do it, and I also am certain that it helps to not engage in western infamy.
"Wealthy people spend more money than poor people."Skans » 27 Mar 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ How wealth trickles down for the ignorant among us:I could go on and on with example after example, but even a total, communist idiot-pig would understand by now.
- Wealthy people spend more money than poor people.
- When wealthy people spend money, they buy things like big houses, cars, and lots of other stuff - stuff that they must pay people to build
- When wealthy people spend money, they often buy businesses. Businesses employ people.
- When wealthy people invest, they hire people to help them with this - people they need to pay.
- When wealthy people invest, it provides a source of capital for companies to expand (i.e. hire more people), pay larger wages/salaries to get quality people, buy infrastructure - all of which takes people to create.
You are so misleading the misled you only know how to recite what corrupts next generations added forward here as you were trained to believe nobody can comprehend evolving is limited to never exceeding the time you are alive now..
Nostradamus'omh » 11 Jul 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ You are so misleading the misled you only know how to recite what corrupts next generations added forward here as you were trained to believe nobody can comprehend evolving is limited to never exceeding the time you are alive now..
It's really very simple and the fact that you're unable to figure it out shows me you've been counting on the leftist hatred of capitalism all your life, and swallow the lies they've been feeding you.Xavier_Onassis » 27 Mar 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is an interesting and at least
partially correct observation
The PROBLEM you have ****, is that YOUR SIDE INVENTED IT when it has NO BASIS OR FOUNDATION IN ANYTHING FACTUAL!!! Which is pretty much ALL YOU LWNJ COMMIES have to do is INVENT **** so they can keep you MINIONS AND LEMMINGS HEADING OFF THE CLIFF SO THEY CAN RUSH IN AND "fix things for you". Of which the ALWAYS forget to do once they are elected.
Our language is loaded with phrases that lead people into false beliefs and harmful actions, but the one I would nominate as the worst and most destructive of all is “trickle-down economics.”
It was devised by Democrats in the 1980s as a way to attack President Reagan’s economic policy combination of tax rate cuts and some relaxation of federal regulations. They needed a catchy, easy-to-remember zinger to fire at Reagan; a line that would keep their voting base angry.
Sneering that Reagan’s policies amounted to cutting taxes on the rich in hopes that some small amount of that money would eventually trickle down into the pockets of workers was perfect. It painted Reagan and other advocates of tax reduction as friends of the rich who would cruelly deprive the government of the money it needed to help the poor and middle class.
Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ It's really very simple and the fact that you're unable to figure it out shows me you've been counting on the leftist hatred of capitalism all your life, and swallow the lies they've been feeding you.
Here's a simple and easy to understand example of how it works.
Let's say I and two friends of mine each have $1000.
I take that money and use it to open my own business that returns me $500 a month in profit.
After two months, I have my initial investment back PLUS I have a business now generating a regular income.
I know that I can increase my profit by adding a sales rep, and Friend #1 agrees to work for me for $200 per week.
After one month's time, he's now earned an additional $1000 to add to his initial $1000, doubling his initial net worth.
With his additional labor, I now have increased my customer base and my business is now earning $2000 per month, half of which is paid to him in salary and the remaining $1000 is mine, doubling my previous profit of $500.
My second friend chooses to do nothing, and holds on to his original $1000. Zero increase in his net worth.
The result is that new wealth has been created, and has increased my wealth and the wealth of Friend #1 who received a share of the "trickled down" new wealth that was created.
You shouldn't need a degree in business to grasp that concept.
To be entertaining one doesn't have to stay amusing corrupted idealists like you. Your mind wants to trigger involuntary emotional responses to vernacular tribalism, and I don't fall into that trap as often as you pretend I did.
I have real constitutional money, your corporation commune has real constitutional money, I do not get any subsidies for business, your corporation commune does not get any subsidies or special treatment, we do not have any individually negotiated contract agreements or any mandatory contracts, goodbye.impartialobserver » 11 Jul 2023, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Like all idioms or slogans.. the meaning is subjective and therefore there is no way to prove it quantitatively. However, without the wealthy there is no financial sector of the economy. The average joe who gets a loan for their small business is not able to do so without the wealthy having their money stashed away in banks.
Nostradamus'omh » 11 Jul 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ To be entertaining one doesn't have to stay amusing corrupted idealists like you. Your mind wants to trigger involuntary emotional responses to vernacular tribalism, and I don't fall into that trap as often as you pretend I did.
On the other side of our discussions I am triggering your instinctive awareness as your brain never stopped navigate space as one of a kind. You just always deny it socially to save your rank in self deception.
Your intellectual mind only understands how to distract from the kinetic how and why living is self evidently evolving in plain sight as ever changing forms shape each reproduction ever lived so far being eternally separated as ancestrally displaced now.