Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
By Pastor Blast
28 Mar 2023 3:58 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
28 Mar 2023 3:58 am
Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
28 Mar 2023 5:49 am
3-21-2023PastorBlast » 28 Mar 2023, 3:58 am » wrote: ↑ Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
"United Kingdom Deputy Minister of Defense Annabelle Goldie publicly stated today that the UK will supply Ukraine with Depleted Uranium (DU) Ammunition for some of the weapons systems supplied by NATO. Russia has previously warned the use of Depleted Uranium will be considered an attack by a "Dirty Nuke".
28 Mar 2023 6:36 am
...why do the NATO c#nts want nukes in ukraine, etc. ad nauseam?PastorBlast » 28 Mar 2023, 3:58 am » wrote: ↑ Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
28 Mar 2023 10:10 am
I do not think that NATO wants nukes in Ukraine.
Putin would perhaps want to store some nukes in Belarus so as to make it necessary to bomb two countries rather than one.
I think the US knows where all of Russia's nukes are.
The US would find it more difficult to find them in Belarus if they were hidden there.
Putin would perhaps want to store some nukes in Belarus so as to make it necessary to bomb two countries rather than one.
I think the US knows where all of Russia's nukes are.
The US would find it more difficult to find them in Belarus if they were hidden there.
28 Mar 2023 3:25 pm
Are the Ukranians firing uranium rounds in Russia?Bob » 28 Mar 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ 3-21-2023
"United Kingdom Deputy Minister of Defense Annabelle Goldie publicly stated today that the UK will supply Ukraine with Depleted Uranium (DU) Ammunition for some of the weapons systems supplied by NATO. Russia has previously warned the use of Depleted Uranium will be considered an attack by a "Dirty Nuke".
This guy thought Uranium was a health supplement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDvk-8WYxYk
28 Mar 2023 3:46 pm
nuclear saber rattling. Vlad has done so before. Positioning nukes in Belarus is not so much a move to intimidate Ukraine as it is a move to further solidify Belarus's status as a Russian client/satellite state. If Vlad wants to use nukes in Ukraine, he doesn't need to move them to Belarus to have them be within tactical range... he's already got Ukraine within tactical nuke range.
28 Mar 2023 4:04 pm
apparently Belarus is closer to Ukraine than Russia is....PastorBlast » 28 Mar 2023, 3:58 am » wrote: ↑ Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
28 Mar 2023 4:17 pm
Depleted Uranium is 59% more dense than lead, and is less malleable, which makes it more effective at piercing armor than bullets made of lead.
It is also radioactive. Using depleted Uranium for weapons also serves to get rid of Uranium that has become too in radioactive to generate hot in reactors.
It is also radioactive. Using depleted Uranium for weapons also serves to get rid of Uranium that has become too in radioactive to generate hot in reactors.
28 Mar 2023 4:18 pm
Why does NATO want tactical nukes in Europe?PastorBlast » 28 Mar 2023, 3:58 am » wrote: ↑ Why Does Russia Want Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... larus.html
Hope everyone's day goes well. Throwing it up on the board for discussion.
I think international arms control could be a good thing. But it will never happen.
The announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus appears to be another attempt to raise the stakes in the conflict in Ukraine.
28 Mar 2023 4:20 pm
Fair enough.. Let's discuss arms control
28 Mar 2023 4:22 pm
The **** they don't. Russia didn't expand an inch after the collapse of the Soviet Union until a puppet was installed in Ukraine. They annexed Crimea to maintain deep water ports. Ukraine being fast tracked into nato was an understandable red line. We should have negotiated. This all was easily avoided by stating Ukraine nato membership was not in consideration. Now we have Russia, China, and **** India all creating a new Warsaw Pact.Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ I do not think that NATO wants nukes in Ukraine.
Putin would perhaps want to store some nukes in Belarus so as to make it necessary to bomb two countries rather than one.
I think the US knows where all of Russia's nukes are.
The US would find it more difficult to find them in Belarus if they were hidden there.
28 Mar 2023 4:32 pm
How many countries did nato add before Russia annexed Crimea? (Peacefully mind you)
28 Mar 2023 4:33 pm
Always parts of Russia.Trumprules » 28 Mar 2023, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Bs the took over Chechnya. And Georgia. Don't you know anything.
28 Mar 2023 4:34 pm
Would rather not see all life on earth end. Won't miss most of the people but the animals deserve better.
28 Mar 2023 4:37 pm
Give them back? They were Russian. Ukraine was never a nuclear power.Trumprules » 28 Mar 2023, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. They along with Ukraine split off of Russia after the Soviet Union broke up. And Russia made a deal with Ukraine for ukraine to give them back 1500 nukes they left In Ukraine for a guarantee of safety.
28 Mar 2023 4:39 pm
They didn't invade anyone until this latest Ukraine fiasco. Did I mention completely avoidable?Trumprules » 28 Mar 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove it why did they have to invade those countries then dick.
28 Mar 2023 4:41 pm
They are Russian satellite "states". Never independent. Would be like Puerto Rico rebels declaring independence from the US.Trumprules » 28 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ prove that Chenya and georgia were not free countries that russia invaded liar.
28 Mar 2023 5:49 pm
Neo » 28 Mar 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ They are Russian satellite "states". Never independent. Would be like Puerto Rico rebels declaring independence from the US.
Belarus will suck a Russian Dick in a hot minute
28 Mar 2023 5:54 pm
PUTIN MADE THE DECISION AFTER NWO UK ANNOUNCED IT WOULD TRANSFER TOXIC DEPLETED URANIUM MUNITIONS TO UKRAINE, A MOVE HE DESCRIBED AS RECKLESSNESS.
DEPLOYING TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN BELARUS AND TRAINING THEIR PILOTS TO USE THEM, IS WHAT THE U.S. HAS BEEN DOING WITH ALLIED COUNTRIES FOR DECADES BY KEEPING ITS OWN NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN BELGIUM, GERMANY, ITALY, THE NETHERLANDS AND TURKEY.
DEPLOYING TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN BELARUS AND TRAINING THEIR PILOTS TO USE THEM, IS WHAT THE U.S. HAS BEEN DOING WITH ALLIED COUNTRIES FOR DECADES BY KEEPING ITS OWN NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN BELGIUM, GERMANY, ITALY, THE NETHERLANDS AND TURKEY.
28 Mar 2023 6:24 pm
Sure...
Arms control is now a dead concept because there is no longer any viable way to enforce it ....because it isn't a uni-polar world anymore ....
And that is my first Salvo on the matter....
Who is online
In total there are 6205 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 6188 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Adsbot, proximic, Googlebot, ADmantX, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit