Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The gun that divides a nation
The gun that divides a nation
By Punch
28 Mar 2023 5:49 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
28 Mar 2023 3:56 pm
Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ Just ban the sale of these weapons now, that is all Biden is asking for.
Ask in one hand and **** in the other to see which weighs more.
28 Mar 2023 3:56 pm
Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Confiscate them all. No more weapons of war in the hands of civilians.
The gun that divides a nation (msn.com)It is revered as a modern-day musket.It is reviled as a tool for mass killers.The AR-15 wasn’t supposed to be a bestseller.The rugged, powerful weapon was originally designed as a soldiers’ rifle in the late 1950s. “An outstanding weapon with phenomenal lethality,” an internal Pentagon report raved. It soon became standard issue for U.S. troops in the Vietnam War, where the weapon earned a new name: the M16.
I am scared to search Alibaba for fully autonomous armed guard.
28 Mar 2023 3:59 pm
So you just want "fewer" people to die? Why just fewer? The AR15 is used in 1% of ALL RIFLE gun violence. Banning the AR certainly will only see fewer people killed.Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ That is an example of what is called the Slippery Slope Fallacy.
If a shooter has a gun that fires six shots before reloading, he will almost certainly harm fewer people than some guy with a gun that can hold 20, 30, or 50 bullets. So at least fewer people will die and be wounded.
You have shown you don't actually care about gun violence. You just want to get rid of one gun because it is involved in just over half of all recent mass shootings.
28 Mar 2023 4:13 pm
It's not safe to shoot at water.Buffalo » 28 Mar 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ If we would start shooting the illegal border crossers as as they reached the middle of the Rio Grande (the border), how many would have to be shot before the others figured out it was not safe to come here? Not many I bet. ALL drug runners and cartel members should be shot on sight!!!
28 Mar 2023 4:18 pm
Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Confiscate them all. No more weapons of war in the hands of civilians.
The gun that divides a nation (msn.com)It is revered as a modern-day musket.It is reviled as a tool for mass killers.The AR-15 wasn’t supposed to be a bestseller.The rugged, powerful weapon was originally designed as a soldiers’ rifle in the late 1950s. “An outstanding weapon with phenomenal lethality,” an internal Pentagon report raved. It soon became standard issue for U.S. troops in the Vietnam War, where the weapon earned a new name: the M16.
Military firearm = Full auto.
Civilian firearm = Semi-auto.
There is the division line.
Why do a mountain of deer-hunters refuse
to use the .223 with a 55 grain bullet ? Too light.
What is a good deer rifle in a 'black-rifle' platform.?
The .300 Blackout with 110gr. bullets at 2350fps (feet per second).
It is very close the Russian AK-47 bullet performance.
28 Mar 2023 4:52 pm
Are you even on the correct thread? I'm talking Columbine; you're talking about Caitlin Jenner. Ban yourself, pervert.Cannonpointer » 28 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The "rule" for millions of parents is that the schools are secretely grooming their children about their perceived "gender."
That's the **** rule.
Now, WHICH DO YOU THINK MORE DIVISIVE? A **** gun, or grooming people's children and outright lying to them that they can change sexes?
28 Mar 2023 5:03 pm
****!!! You are just an ignorant anti-gun liberal nut job!!!Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ No matter what reasons the shooter had in this case, the fact is that had the shooter no AR-15 fewer or no persons would have been killed.
28 Mar 2023 7:11 pm
AR-15 <> M16. Just thought you'd want to know.Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Confiscate them all. No more weapons of war in the hands of civilians.
It soon became standard issue for U.S. troops in the Vietnam War, where the weapon earned a new name: the M16.
Okay, name one military in the world, that arms it's military with the AR-15.
I'll wait.
28 Mar 2023 7:21 pm
Invaded by trannies who were born here? That makes sense. NOT!PhiloBeddo » 28 Mar 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Our politicians are letting our country be invaded. We need our guns. Somebody has to take care of business.
28 Mar 2023 7:24 pm
28 Mar 2023 7:29 pm
This isn't an AR-15...Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ No matter what reasons the shooter had in this case, the fact is that had the shooter no AR-15 fewer or no persons would have been killed.
... yet it shoots the same round at the same rate, and has the same capacity as one.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
28 Mar 2023 7:30 pm
But it's not black and scary.RedheadedStranger » 28 Mar 2023, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ This isn't an AR-15...
... yet it shoots the same round at the same rate, and has the same capacity as one.
28 Mar 2023 7:32 pm
And it's not a "weapon of war" either.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
28 Mar 2023 7:45 pm
Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Confiscate them all. No more weapons of war in the hands of civilians.
The gun that divides a nation (msn.com)It is revered as a modern-day musket.It is reviled as a tool for mass killers.The AR-15 wasn’t supposed to be a bestseller.The rugged, powerful weapon was originally designed as a soldiers’ rifle in the late 1950s. “An outstanding weapon with phenomenal lethality,” an internal Pentagon report raved. It soon became standard issue for U.S. troops in the Vietnam War, where the weapon earned a new name: the M16.
The AR 15 was not made for the military. This is simply a lie. the only gun on your funny list here that was intended for military use was the ak47
28 Mar 2023 7:51 pm
****. It's just one more step on gun confiscation. And don't even TRY to pretend that's not the objective.Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ Just ban the sale of these weapons now, that is all Biden is asking for.
28 Mar 2023 7:53 pm
No, ***. The nation is completely in one accord on how horrible Columbine was, ya stewpid ****. Your mention of columbine is the FIRST MENTION in the thread, and there is no disagreement that it was a bad thing, dummy. THE THREAD is about how divided we are as a nation, and you're also talking about infringing on rights. Those are the issues YOU raised - try to keep up with yourself.Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you even on the correct thread? I'm talking Columbine; you're talking about Caitlin Jenner. Ban yourself, pervert.
We are not NEARLY so divided over some **** gun as we are over children being molested, fruity.
My argument is specifically directed to the OP and it is relevant. Your Columbine reference is irrelevant to the thread.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
28 Mar 2023 8:02 pm
Cannonpointer » 28 Mar 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ***. The nation is completely in one accord on how horrible Columbine was, ya stewpid ****. Your mention of columbine is the FIRST MENTION in the thread, and there is no disagreement that it was a bad thing, dummy. THE THREAD is about how divided we are as a nation, and you're also talking about infringing on rights. Those are the issues YOU raised - try to keep up with yourself.
We are not NEARLY so divided over some **** gun as we are over children being molested, fruity.
My argument is specifically directed to the OP and it is relevant. Your Columbine reference is irrelevant to the thread.
MY THREAD is about gun violence, you ****. Columbine and Caitlin Jenner were metaphors. English much, dummy?
28 Mar 2023 8:03 pm
The Nashville school shooter's parents thought the assailant shouldn't have guns, but the shooter bought 7 guns legally, police say
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/th ... 8c6e&ei=11
RED FLAG LAWS NOW!!!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/th ... 8c6e&ei=11
RED FLAG LAWS NOW!!!
28 Mar 2023 8:06 pm
Punch » 28 Mar 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ The Nashville school shooter's parents thought the assailant shouldn't have guns, but the shooter bought 7 guns legally, police say
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/th ... 8c6e&ei=11
RED FLAG LAWS NOW!!!
red flag laws would be fine if they actually prevented crazy people to purchase guns (trannies, for example).
but leftists would claim that Christianity is a mental illness...they would abuse the law to target people they simply dont like.
28 Mar 2023 8:09 pm
That's true, but still...FOS » 28 Mar 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ red flag laws would be fine if they actually prevented crazy people to purchase guns (trannies, for example).
but leftists would claim that Christianity is a mental illness...they would abuse the law to target people they simply dont like.
Who is online
In total there are 4869 users online :: 17 registered, 19 bots, and 4833 guests
Registered users: Vegas, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: aiohttp, ADmantX, Yahoo! Slurp, LCC, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, proximic, okhttp, Not, CriteoBot, DuckDuckGo, Applebot, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider