Biden does not direct US policy. Why do you keep pretending he does?Skans » 31 Mar 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ It would be great if all of these countries donated ammo and equipment for Russia's cause. It would all be destroyed. And, it would leave the evil half of the world vulnerable to attack. A US president with my mindset would take advantage of that. He would swoop in and help Japan take back the South China Sea. He would command South Korea to invade N. Korea and go for a big land-grab. And, Ukraine would take back Crimea.
But, this takes a President with a brain and balls. Three things Biden does not have.
I’m not backing either side, we don’t have a dog in the fight. We shouldn’t be borrowing money to give Ukraine.Taipan » 31 Mar 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Sir,
Texas is about the size of Ukraine.
Ukraine is loaded down with reeal fighters.
So,.....is Texas.
There will be no back-down. NONE.
Peace??
Of course !!
Let's talk peace !!
Duhhhhhhhh...........
One question.
Why are you backing Communist, USSR, Russia ?
100 billion wasted in Ukraine would build a wall.Trumprules » 31 Mar 2023, 11:54 pm » wrote: ↑ But by God you will run up the debt by 25% under Trump. Did Mexico pay for the wall slick?
Let me know when they pay it back, retard.Trumprules » 31 Mar 2023, 11:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey dumb *** it's lent to them like we did the British during world War two.
Baby raping is not going to win you elections, copper. You think we're done? ***, YOU'RE done - ya just don't know it.
Trumprules » 31 Mar 2023, 11:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey dumb *** it's lent to them like we did the British during world War two.
Remember when trump ordered the generals to end our illegal occupation of Syria THREE TIMES (once from a **** SOTU address, which is unprecedented)? And they basically told him to **** himself. Then he covered his humiliation by pretending that it was HIS idea to occupy the oil fields.SJConspirator » 31 Mar 2023, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑Biden does not direct US policy. Why do you keep pretending he does?Skans » 31 Mar 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ It would be great if all of these countries donated ammo and equipment for Russia's cause. It would all be destroyed. And, it would leave the evil half of the world vulnerable to attack. A US president with my mindset would take advantage of that. He would swoop in and help Japan take back the South China Sea. He would command South Korea to invade N. Korea and go for a big land-grab. And, Ukraine would take back Crimea.
But, this takes a President with a brain and balls. Three things Biden does not have.
.Vegas » 30 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ America has blood on their hands for much of these causalities, on both sides. .
Where, in the statement that you quoted of mine, did I ever say Biden directs US policy? He doesn't, I know that and would never say or insinuate it.SJConspirator » 31 Mar 2023, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden does not direct US policy. Why do you keep pretending he does?
He could have done it. But, Trump would have had to have been far more strategic in his planning than he was. My biggest beef with Trump is that he lacks a lot when it comes to strategy. You have to own a couple of generals and even colonels that will make **** happen for you. Trump didn't have their pickles in his pocket. Like Regan did with Colonel Oliver North.Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2023, 1:18 am » wrote: ↑ Remember when trump ordered the generals to end our illegal occupation of Syria THREE TIMES (once from a **** SOTU address, which is unprecedented)? And they basically told him to **** himself. Then he covered his humiliation by pretending that it was HIS idea to occupy the oil fields.
pResidents run their mouths - they do not run the MIC. It's above their pay grade. If trump had run the military, the wall would have been built. He WANTED that wall. He couldn't even direct the **** army corp of enginers, ffs.
Bush ran north - not reagan.Skans » 01 Apr 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ He could have done it. But, Trump would have had to have been far more strategic in his planning than he was. My biggest beef with Trump is that he lacks a lot when it comes to strategy. You have to own a couple of generals and even colonels that will make **** happen for you. Trump didn't have their pickles in his pocket. Like Regan did with Colonel Oliver North.
You very directly implied it. It's one thing to back up, and say, hey - you're right on that. It's quite another to lie about the obvious and inescapable meaning of your post.Skans » 01 Apr 2023, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ Where, in the statement that you quoted of mine, did I ever say Biden directs US policy? He doesn't, I know that and would never say or insinuate it.
Skans » 31 Mar 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ But, this takes a President with a brain and balls. Three things Biden does not have.
Skans » 01 Apr 2023, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ Where, in the statement that you quoted of mine, did I ever say Biden directs US policy? He doesn't, I know that and would never say or insinuate it.
Between Obama/ Biden and Biden/Harris not to mention Pelosi they are responsible for more than 70% of all US debt.Trumprules » 31 Mar 2023, 11:54 pm » wrote: ↑ But by God you will run up the debt by 25% under Trump. Did Mexico pay for the wall slick?