Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahaha.
maybe in your little activist bubble but I doubt most people didn't even give it a second thought when voting .....
and you nor your activist based links have any proof that anybody in the Trump family brought back any elephant parts or trophies into the US.
while LEGALLY hunting abroad.....
and the only thing they have proven is that Trump's sons like to hunt .....which is not a crime.
and Biden has not reinstated the ban ....why not?
This is how smart leftists are...Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahaha.
maybe in your little activist bubble but I doubt most people didn't even give it a second thought when voting .....
and you nor your activist based links have any proof that anybody in the Trump family brought back any elephant parts or trophies into the US.
while LEGALLY hunting abroad.....
and the only thing they have proven is that Trump's sons like to hunt .....which is not a crime.
and Biden has not reinstated the ban ....why not?
Your assumptions are hilariously childish...jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ and your hatred of animals allows you to love and admire your fellow animal hater, trump.
sorry, I don't share your sheer hatred of animals.
Yep.roadkill » 04 Apr 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ This is how smart leftists are...![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc4Mi4ocyDw
No, it wsn't .....you like to think it was because you care about the subject matter ......and just like all leftists you believe everyone is just like you.....
This was never a hot button issue .......ever.jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ americans did not want to pay 70 thousand american tax dollars for trump's sons to kill rare animals.
jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ you must want elephants to be extinct. all shot by trump's sons.
why do you hate elephants?
Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Your assumptions are hilariously childish...
because now you are claiming I am an animal hater when part of my income comes from raising animals , caring for them , until such time they get slaughtered to help feed the entire continent .....
so, once again your assumption has made an *** out of you ....
and it is quite disturbing that you blame Trump for the illegal poaching of endangered species when all governments in Africa have a legal big game and endangered species hunting tourism industry.
race has nothing to with elephants being massacred by blood thirsty hunters.
Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ This was never a hot button issue .......ever.
you did not want to pay .....
1. Alvin Bragg.jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ race has nothing to with elephants being massacred by blood thirsty hunters.
So, now you are claiming that because I accurately described you as an "animal lover"......I was being derogatory. ....jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ ****.
you called me an animal lover.
only people who hate animals would use that term in a derogatory nature..
No, Trump didn't lose because of some obscure cause that a few activists tried to promote by falsley accusing trump,of being an elephant killer...
Except it isn't the legal hunting or hunters that is the problem ...jerrab » 04 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ race has nothing to with elephants being massacred by blood thirsty hunters.
****, he changed the law for personal reasons and that is one of the reasons he LOST.Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Except it isn't the legal hunting or hunters that is the problem ...
it's the poachers that is the biggest problem ....
and then The African governments that support the legal hunting which is also a huge problem .....
Because like I proved to you earlier ....
The law Obama enacted did not affect or make unlawful in any way, shape or form the ability for Americans to go on legal big game hunts or the legal hunting of endangered animals as long as they didn't bring their trophies home .....
especially Ivory....
so, when Trump reversed it nothing actually changed because the import of ivory is still illegal unless it can be deemed antiquated (100 years old).
so, the funny thing here is that you admitted that because Trump changed the law it made you hate him but yet the law didn't actually change like your activist based links said it did and which you based your opinion on and your hate for Trump....
see where this is going ...?
Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Trump didn't lose because of some obscure cause that a few activists tried to promote by falsley accusing trump,of being an elephant killer...
sorry, but most Americans had other things far more important on their minds ....
but nice try ....
Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Except it isn't the legal hunting or hunters that is the problem ...
it's the poachers that is the biggest problem ....
and then The African governments that support the legal hunting which is also a huge problem .....
Because like I proved to you earlier ....
The law Obama enacted did not affect or make unlawful in any way, shape or form the ability for Americans to go on legal big game hunts or the legal hunting of endangered animals as long as they didn't bring their trophies home .....
especially Ivory....
so, when Trump reversed it nothing actually changed because the import of ivory is still illegal unless it can be deemed antiquated (100 years old).
so, the funny thing here is that you admitted that because Trump changed the law it made you hate him but yet the law didn't actually change like your activist based links said it did and which you based your opinion on and your hate for Trump....
see where this is going ...?
Majik » 04 Apr 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ So, now you are claiming that because I accurately described you as an "animal lover"......I was being derogatory. ....
How do you get by in life by being this obtuse ?
walking around day in and day out with a massive chip on your shoulder......pointing your finger at what is in essence your own manufactured paranoia of how people perceive you....