Majik » 03 Apr 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Just as many people don't like Biden or the direction the Dem party pivoted towards .....
So what is your point ....
also what does the legal hunting of elephants have to do with any of this ....?
except to try and falsley vilify .....
Is hunting elephants a CRIME, cuckbreath??jerrab » 03 Apr 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ many people don't like him. his sons love to kill elephants and a lot of people don't like that. so now you are going to say nothing is wrong with murdering elephants (your next step).
I don't care what you think.Beekeeper » 03 Apr 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Is hunting elephants a CRIME, cuckbreath??
Didn't think so, so what is your PROBLEM?? You now want to lock people up for the LEGAL taking of big game that is MANAGED by African nations?? YOU NAZIS are getting more and more WACKO on every post you make!!
Remember when Trump cooked his own books to cover up the payment to Stormy Daniels? Remember when he did that to hide it during his election? Remember when the Grand Jury decided that the combined acts were cause for an indictment?roadkill » 02 Apr 2023, 4:25 am » wrote: ↑ Remember the $850k Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones to keep the sexual harassment case out of court? I do.
The $500k Bill was paid to give a speech in Russia covered most of that cost. Remember the outrage by the left? Me neither.
Link?jerrab » 03 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ trump made it legal himself for trophies.
he changed the law for his won benefit.
what a scrounge.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN1DK2FE
And the child GROOMER is backScottMon » 03 Apr 2023, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember when Trump cooked his own books to cover up the payment to Stormy Daniels? Remember when he did that to hide it during his election? Remember when the Grand Jury decided that the combined acts were cause for an indictment?
Well, at least I have you admitting you hate him.....jerrab » 03 Apr 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't care what you think.
and that is one of the many reasons why I hate trump.
and he is sneaky.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... hy-imports
The Trump administration has lifted a ban on importing sport-hunted trophies of elephants from certain African countries, just over three months after President Trump appeared to pause a first attempt to do so amid public uproar. In a memo dated March 1, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said that in place of the Obama-era blanket ban, the agency will consider importation permits "on a case-by-case basis."The memo, which was not publicized by the agency, did not clarify the specific guidelines by which the permits would be judged. It is also not clear what role was played in the decision by the president, who has publicly expressed his opposition several times to rolling back the ban.
----------------------------------------------
---------------------------------Majik » 03 Apr 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, at least I have you admitting you hate him.....
and by they way your link says nothing about Trump changing the law for himself ....
So, it's just another of one of your baseless assumptions .....
Remember when the FEC investigated it and said no laws were broken....ScottMon » 03 Apr 2023, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember when Trump cooked his own books to cover up the payment to Stormy Daniels? Remember when he did that to hide it during his election? Remember when the Grand Jury decided that the combined acts were cause for an indictment?
Jeese jerrab...did you read the article?
And biden killed 13 American service members...what's your point?jerrab » 03 Apr 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ ----------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... t-trophies
The Trump administration’s decision to loosen restrictions around the import of elephant trophies from Zimbabwe and Zambia has turned attention back to the president’s family’s own connection to the controversial sport.Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump are prolific big-game hunters and during the 2016 campaign, images re-emerged of the pair on a 2011 hunting trip posing with animals they had killed on safari, including an elephant, a buffalo and a leopard.
New evidence discovered? New testimony? 32 indictments pending?Majik » 03 Apr 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember when the FEC investigated it and said no laws were broken....
and the DOJ which also refused to bring charges because they too said that it would be impossible to prove the case ....
.
Another link that does not prove your assumption .....jerrab » 03 Apr 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ ---------------------------------
https://apnews.com/article/north-americ ... dd52e9da91
Trump wildlife protection board stuffed with trophy hunters
So glad you brought that up. Making accusations like that without proof is a great way to show how little you really care about protecting children.
MR-7 » 03 Apr 2023, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ And biden killed 13 American service members...what's your point?
do you read what you post?MR-7 » 03 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Jeese jerrab...did you read the article?
"I didn't want elephants killed and stuffed and have the tusks brought back into this [country]. And people can talk all they want about preservation and all other things that they're saying," he told British broadcaster Piers Morgan, referring to the argument proffered by his own interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, and others that fees paid by big-game hunters could help fund conservation programs. "In that case, the money was going to a government that was probably taking the money, OK?""That was done by a very high-level government person," he added in reference to the agency's decision. "As soon as I heard about it, I turned it around."
Since that decision in November, however, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Obama administration had acted improperly in implementing its ban. That late December ruling, which addressed a lawsuit brought by Safari Club International and the National Rifle Association, found that the administration did not sufficiently observe the rules around creating a new regulation, such as inviting public comment.