Liberal Forum

FredH » 23 Apr 2023, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:08 pm

So some cocksucker attorney starts a class action suit, bribes people to sign on and Trump is supposed to waste his time with chump change?

COOL STORY, BRO.

25M ain't chump change for anybody. 


certainly not YOU, you **** moron!  

FredH » 23 Apr 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:07 pm

Like a phony impeachment means anything, I like how you added "yet".

two impeachments...and neither was phony.

maineman » 23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm

two impeachments...and neither was phony.

****!  
If they weren't completely phony, he would have been found guilty!

Or is it that you suddenly don't believe the results of both trials?
 

maineman » 23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm

two impeachments...and neither was phony.

Sure they were, Trump inquiring about Biden blackmailing the Ukrainians to fire a prosecutor and the second just as much BS. Both failed with good reason. Impeaching Biden will only prove how corrupt ALL the demrats are. There is good reason to impeach Biden, real reasons.

maineman » 23 Apr 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:10 pm

COOL STORY, BRO.

25M ain't chump change for anybody. 

certainly not YOU, you **** moron!

Do you actually know how many millions is in a billion?

FredH » 23 Apr 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:17 pm

Do you actually know how many millions is in a billion?

I do.  I think it is funny that a guy who doesn't have two dimes to rub together can brag about some chump who has over-inflated his worth to the point of having his CFO do hard time having to pay $25M to anyone for anything.

FredH » 23 Apr 2023, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:16 pm

Sure they were, Trump inquiring about Biden blackmailing the Ukrainians to fire a prosecutor and the second just as much BS. Both failed with good reason. Impeaching Biden will only prove how corrupt ALL the demrats are. There is good reason to impeach Biden, real reasons.

cool story bro.  Everybody's got an opinion... everybody's got an asshole... most of them stink...yours do.

Zeets2 » 23 Apr 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:14 pm

****!  
If they weren't completely phony, he would have been found guilty!

Or is it that you suddenly don't believe the results of both trials?

actually, that is not true.  If his party stands with him regardless of his guilt or innocence, he escapes, doesn't he?

Was Clinton's impeachment "phony"?

sootedupCyndi » 10 Apr 2023, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Apr 2023, 2:00 pm

Oh Look-ee. If you cant be polite here- get the f- out.... playing the rightie role- isn't gonna get you any brownie points here?
because these guys don't fall for low IQ's like you.. ***
BOO

Suck my dogs *** whore.

Biden to be impeached soon

.
Whats the difference...he wouldn't know anyhow !
.
.
...  
 
 

FredH » 02 Apr 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2023, 3:32 pm

Failure to uphold his duties, mental issues, open border,incompetence.

I bet they could come up with over 100 articles.

maineman » 23 Apr 2023, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:26 pm

actually, that is not true.  If his party stands with him regardless of his guilt or innocence, he escapes, doesn't he?

Was Clinton's impeachment "phony"?

Not necessarily.  That could only happen if the Senate doesn't have the required 2/3 vote to convict.

What made Clinton's impeachment phony is the fact that the Senate had damning evidence of Bubba's guilt of HIS felonies because the truth was revealed that he lied to Congress and suborned perjury from his cabinet, and they STILL voted along partisan lines to acquit him at trial.  There was undisputable and factual evidence of his felonies, and THAT is what was completely lacking in the kangaroo court the Democrats ran against Trump.

Or would a bright guy like you care to dispute those facts?
 

maineman » 23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2023, 6:11 pm

two impeachments...and neither was phony.

Something tells me you have a Vindman Shrine set up in your living room......is it the fancy ribbons and brass ornaments?

Zeets2 » 24 Apr 2023, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 6:35 am

Not necessarily.  That could only happen if the Senate doesn't have the required 2/3 vote to convict.

What made Clinton's impeachment phony is the fact that the Senate had damning evidence of Bubba's guilt of HIS felonies because the truth was revealed that he lied to Congress and suborned perjury from his cabinet, and they STILL voted along partisan lines to acquit him at trial.  There was undisputable and factual evidence of his felonies, and THAT is what was completely lacking in the kangaroo court the Democrats ran against Trump.

Or would a bright guy like you care to dispute those facts?

The fact is, impeachment is not a criminal proceeding but a political one.  Trump's impeachments were no more or less "phony" than Clinton's.
 

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 6:46 am

The fact is, impeachment is not a criminal proceeding but a political one.  Trump's impeachments were no more or less "phony" than Clinton's.

****! 
Partisan libs like you always attempt to equate the two cases as if the evidence was the same in both, and you cannot deny that such was NOT the case!  Democrat scum tried desperately to advance the phony claim that Trump incited the J6 riot and could not prove that anything he said amounted to such a blatant lie, just as they claimed that his phone call to Ukraine was interference in their election the same way that Biden's extortion did ON VIDEO when it was clearly NOT similar!  Compare that to Clinton's impeachment where he is on film lying to the country, lying to Congress, and obstructing justice by ordering his cabinet members to lie for him.  There was NOTHING obscure about the multiple felonies Clinton committed, starting with the stained blue dress!

Only desperate libs like you have the balls to try to claim they were the same, and you know it just as every other corrupt Democrat does! 
 

Zeets2 » 24 Apr 2023, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 8:04 am

****! 
Partisan libs like you always attempt to equate the two cases as if the evidence was the same in both, and you cannot deny that such was NOT the case!  Democrat scum tried desperately to advance the phony claim that Trump incited the J6 riot and could not prove that anything he said amounted to such a blatant lie, just as they claimed that his phone call to Ukraine was interference in their election the same way that Biden's extortion did ON VIDEO when it was clearly NOT similar!  Compare that to Clinton's impeachment where he is on film lying to the country, lying to Congress, and obstructing justice by ordering his cabinet members to lie for him.  There was NOTHING obscure about the multiple felonies Clinton committed, starting with the stained blue dress!

Only desperate libs like you have the balls to try to claim they were the same, and you know it just as every other corrupt Democrat does!

Bill lied about a blowjob.

The clown paid hush money to a hooker... and I happen to think that BOTH of his impeachments were totally warranted.

We're just gonna have to agree to disagree.

RebelGator » 24 Apr 2023, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 6:39 am

Something tells me you have a Vindman Shrine set up in your living room......is it the fancy ribbons and brass ornaments?

There are no Vindman shrines in my house.  I DO have a shrine of sorts to Abe Lincoln and another to Ted Williams, however.

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 9:14 am

Bill lied about a blowjob.

The clown paid hush money to a hooker... and I happen to think that BOTH of his impeachments were totally warranted.

We're just gonna have to agree to disagree.

it is not against the law to do so... sad unAmerican democrats are so hell bent on destroying trump

FJB » 24 Apr 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 9:17 am

it is not against the law to do so... sad unAmerican democrats are so hell bent on destroying trump

Some attorneys would disagree.

I think it is sad that unAmerican MAGAts are hell bent on destroying our Constitutional form of government.

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 9:14 am

Bill lied about a blowjob.

The clown paid hush money to a hooker... and I happen to think that BOTH of his impeachments were totally warranted.

We're just gonna have to agree to disagree.

Again, you're attempting to equate the two and it's a complete lie on your part, whether you chose to believe it or not.
Clinton DID NOT get impeached for a blowjob, you liar!  He got impeached for lying to Congress and obstruction of justice, and those are clear felonies with more than sufficient undeniable evidence of the crimes he committed.  And you scumbag Democrats continue to try pushing your lie every time the subject comes up!

If you're foolish enough to think that it's a crime to pay someone in a non-disclosure agreement, you're sadly mistaken and completely ignorant of the law.  NDA's are perfectly legal and they're done every day in corporations just like Trump's.  And there isn't a scintilla of proof that there was ever any purpose for them entering into such an agreement other than an attempt to keep knowledge of the affair from his wife, a perfectly reasonable purpose for the NDA.

You'll never get your lies past me, so don't even try!