Petty actions appear to be your mission in life.POM » 08 Apr 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Taking this one to the top to bump B.see's TRIPE off the first page.
What is your mission?
Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun.
Don't fear sicking the Reaper upon unworthy civilizations.
ET was real. His daughter lives in my basement.Beekeeper » 07 Apr 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course not ducksuck. ET was a FICTIONAL CHARACTER in a Spielberg movie.
Bet you thought it was REAL huh? And that he really did "phone home".
2 nuclear bombs ended the WWII Pacific campaign. It was a solution then and can still be a solution today.Xavier_Onassis » 07 Apr 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't know much about this. My friend and colleague is Taiwanese and his sister is married to a Japanese guy and thy live in Tokyo,
The Chinese hate the former WWII government of Japan.
The Japanese are competitors of the Chinese and of course do not want the Chinese to dominate East Asia.
Americans cannot tell the difference between Chinese, Japanese, Korans and Taiwanese.
Nuclear war should be avoided, it is not a solution to anything.
Damn, now where did I put my little negro piggy butt-humping that monetary ignoramus peepee piggy???peepee » 18 Apr 2023, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ ...skin's $hit-puppet ideas![]()
are somewhat typical in the republic#nt/democ#nt community...
Skans » 18 Apr 2023, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Damn, I put my negro piggy into my stretched out anal sphincter again!
You're a sick little piss bucket toting PISSBOY!!peepee » 18 Apr 2023, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑Damn, I put my negro piggy into my stretched out anal sphincter again!
They want me, don't they. I know it. But, they're too alien-faced for me.
difference is .. Japan didn’t have nukes to retaliate withSkans » 18 Apr 2023, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ 2 nuclear bombs ended the WWII Pacific campaign. It was a solution then and can still be a solution today.
Not really. Not if we strike them first when they aren't suspecting. We have satellite capability of destroying the guidance systems on their nukes before they even get 100 feet into the air. It would be a one-sided holocaust of epic proportions, but no one on their side will be around to talk about it.Mrkelly » 18 Apr 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ difference is .. Japan didn’t have nukes to retaliate with
Russia has over 5000
Skans » 18 Apr 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Not really. Not if we strike them first when they aren't suspecting. We have satellite capability of destroying the guidance systems on their nukes before they even get 100 feet into the air. It would be a one-sided holocaust of epic proportions, but no one on their side will be around to talk about it.
Skans never thinks,,,,Mrkelly » 18 Apr 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ difference is .. Japan didn’t have nukes to retaliate with
Russia has over 5000

Suddenly loves all things SWAMP....funny old manSkans » 18 Apr 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Not really. Not if we strike them first when they aren't suspecting. We have satellite capability of destroying the guidance systems on their nukes before they even get 100 feet into the air. It would be a one-sided holocaust of epic proportions, but no one on their side will be around to talk about it.
No love for the Biden-Swamp. No, but if the Swamp worked for me, once I skinnied down those organizations, I'd show them the love they deserve.
Skans » 18 Apr 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Not really. Not if we strike them first when they aren't suspecting. We have satellite capability of destroying the guidance systems on their nukes before they even get 100 feet into the air. It would be a one-sided holocaust of epic proportions, but no one on their side will be around to talk about it.
You are the filthy swamp man....full of hate and loneliness.Skans » 18 Apr 2023, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ No love for the Biden-Swamp. No, but if the Swamp worked for me, once I skinnied down those organizations, I'd show them the love they deserve.