Liberal Forum

RichClem » 13 Aug 2014 5:57 am » wrote:
You're a self described Socialist.

Their housing sector is Socialized. Why aren't your proud of it?

Answer: you're a hopeless lying troll.

You're a self-described conservative, defending socialized medicine, socialized housing, government ownership of over half the economy, a police state that outlaws BUBBLE GUM (and home-ownership for 88% of its citizens), some of the highest tax rates in the world (when you stop pretending gunpoint "rents" are not TAXES) and government-owned media.

And you are calling ME a troll?

Nice one, *** - nice one.

RichClem » 13 Aug 2014 2:13 pm » wrote: I never, ever claimed that the East Bloc was crushed. We never threatened them.

It was the Soviet Union we threatened and crushed,

My bad - I thought the east bloc was part of the soviet union. Oh, wait - you're an idiot.

The Eastern Bloc was the name used by NATO-affiliated countries for the former communist states of Central and Eastern Europe, generally the Soviet Union and the countries of the Warsaw Pact.[
1]

RichClem » 13 Aug 2014 2:13 pm » wrote:and once that was gone, we were no threat at all to Eastern Europe.

We gave them the launch codes so they could disarm the missiles pointed at their population centers?

I did NOT know that - thanks for rhe update.

So, the missiles pointed at their countries had literally no effect on their actions, because they held the launch codes - that IS you claim, yes? They were completely free-will agents, with thousands of nukes aimed at them - BECAUSE THEY HELD THE LAUNCH CODES AND COULD DISARM THOSE MISSILES - yes? That's your claim?

Or were they merely mind-readers who KNEW that we wanted only for them to choose freely - and socialism was JUST FINE with us, if that was their true desire? Is THAT your narrative, you romantic, wall-street-horny homosexual?

Hey, ***: REAGAN DID NOT SPEND BILLIONS OF YEN DEFEATING THE USSR, JUST TO TURN RIGHT AROUND AND ALLOW THE DISINTEGRATED STATES IT SHED TO CONTINUE PRACTICING SOCIALISM, YOU IGNORANT, ROMANTIC, ELEVEN YEAR OLD GIRL

Your effeminate pretense that our fallen foes had a "choice" about remaining socialist is flowery girlishness even by YOUR blatantly homosexual standards, clemspew.

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2014 5:20 am » wrote: My bad - I thought the east bloc was part of the soviet union. Oh, wait - you're an idiot.

No, Eastern Europe was not part of the Soviet Union, moonbat.

Nor did we threaten them in the slightest after they were free.

Troll pseudo-"history" is very amusing though.

RichClem » 13 Aug 2014 2:13 pm » wrote:and once that was gone, we were no threat at all to Eastern Europe.

We gave them the launch codes so they could disarm the missiles pointed at their population centers? I did NOT know that - thanks for rhe update. So, the missiles pointed at their countries had literally no effect on their actions, because they held the launch codes - that IS you claim, yes? They were completely free-will agents, with thousands of nukes aimed at them - BECAUSE THEY HELD THE LAUNCH CODES AND COULD DISARM THOSE MISSILES - yes? That's your claim? Or were they merely mind-readers who KNEW that we wanted only for them to choose freely - and socialism was JUST FINE with us, if that was their true desire? Is THAT your narrative, you romantic, wall-street-horny homosexual?

Hey, ***: REAGAN DID NOT SPEND BILLIONS OF YEN DEFEATING THE USSR, JUST TO TURN RIGHT AROUND AND ALLOW THE DISINTEGRATED STATES IT SHED TO CONTINUE PRACTICING SOCIALISM, YOU IGNORANT, ROMANTIC, ELEVEN YEAR OLD GIRL

Your effeminate pretense that our fallen foes had a "choice" about remaining socialist is flowery girlishness even by YOUR blatantly homosexual standards, clemspew.[/quote]

.

Hey moonbat, Reagan was out of office when Eastern Europe freely chose Free Market policies.

What, he brought the launch codes to his ranch?

No, moonbat, Eastern Europe loved Reagan and made their decision by their own free will.

Leftists like you go bonkers rather than admit people prefer freedom to coercive Socialism.

RichClem » 14 Aug 2014 7:52 am » wrote:
No, Eastern Europe was not part of the Soviet Union, moonbat.

Nor did we threaten them in the slightest after they were free.

So the missiles pointed at them were NOT a threat?

Okay. Thanks. Troll pseudo-"history" is very amusing


.

RichClem » 14 Aug 2014 7:52 am » wrote: Hey moonbat, Reagan was out of office when Eastern Europe freely chose Free Market policies.

You still never explained how nations with missiles pointed at them "freely" choose.

Explain that, Cindy.

RichClem » 14 Aug 2014 7:52 am » wrote:No, moonbat, Eastern Europe loved Reagan and made their decision by their own free will.

Those are marketing words from a clearly gay man. Where is your link proving "Eastern Europe" "loved" reagan?

And how does a nation with missiles pointed at it exercise free will?

RichClem » 14 Aug 2014 7:52 am » wrote:Leftists like you go bonkers rather than admit people prefer freedom to coercive Socialism.

You are the one that defends socilalst police states, clemmie.

How can a nation freely choose, if the junta that destroyed its previous union still has missiles pointed at it?

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2014 8:01 am » wrote: So the missiles pointed at them were NOT a threat?

Okay. Thanks. Troll pseudo-"history" is very amusing

Okay moonbat, bleat what ever silly bulls*** you want.

According to the psychotic, ex-president Reagan threatened to nuke newly freed Eastern Europe if they didn't choose Free Market policies.

I doubt even the stupidest moonbats on the world will buy that.

Bleat away.

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2014 8:01 am » wrote: Those are marketing words from a clearly gay man. Where is your link proving "Eastern Europe" "loved" reagan?

Clearly reality is beyond your capability.

RichClem » 14 Aug 2014 8:23 am » wrote: Clearly reality is beyond your capability.

Said the little My Little Pony twerp whose ideer of history is his story about a romance between RONNIE RAY GUN and a grateful East Bloc, ending with a cheek to cheek daaaahnce...

You're an idiot, clembot. This crap is why no one on this board respects you - why you DARED no name genuine conservatives when challenged to do so. You think, "Nuh uhh! They LOVED Reagan!" is an actual argument - especially if you claim I'm a "moonbat" for doubting you.

The actual ISSUE, My Little Pony, was whether you could name a SING;E COUNTRY ON EARTH that adopted capitalism without a gun pointed at it. The fact that you named the East Bloc, WHICH HAD JUST LOST AN ARMS RACE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, just shows how gay you really are, Glory Hole.

You refuse to say WHEN the East Bloc adopted capitalism. Your claim that they adopted it to the east and the north, and the west and the south of Tikrit has been a big laugh, but a fail, nerd. You have failed. You did not name a single nation, you did not say when, how, who - ANYTHING, - besides, "Derp, the East Bloc loved Reagan and freedom and mom and capitalism, derp."

You failed, but you won't shut up - you'll keep screeching like a little bitch. You're the biggest loser on this board, and the least respected asswipe on the right, chump change.

What a waste of a perfectly good sticky.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2014 1:54 am » wrote: 88% of Singaporeans live in government housing - after 50 years of the "economic freedom" in Singapore's Authoritarian Capitalist state.

Want to re-think any one of your positions? I.E., what freedom is or what Singapore is?

Take your time - you're already late. Your smarmy, off-topic response will show no interest in salvaging a shred of dignity, I wager.

Says the homosexual who steals peoples soks, and gives themselves a bunch of reputation points with them. You have no dignity, little boy ****.

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2014 3:02 am » wrote: Said the little My Little Pony twerp whose ideer of history is his story about a romance between RONNIE RAY GUN and a grateful East Bloc, ending with a cheek to cheek daaaahnce... You're an idiot, clembot. This crap is why no one on this board respects you - why you DARED no name genuine conservatives when challenged to do so. You think, "Nuh uhh! They LOVED Reagan!" is an actual argument - especially if you claim I'm a "moonbat" for doubting you. The actual ISSUE, My Little Pony, was whether you could name a SING;E COUNTRY ON EARTH that adopted capitalism without a gun pointed at it. The fact that you named the East Bloc, WHICH HAD JUST LOST AN ARMS RACE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, just shows how gay you really are, Glory Hole. You refuse to say WHEN the East Bloc adopted capitalism. Your claim that they adopted it to the east and the north, and the west and the south of Tikrit has been a big laugh, but a fail, nerd. You have failed. You did not name a single nation, you did not say when, how, who - ANYTHING, - besides, "Derp, the East Bloc loved Reagan and freedom and mom and capitalism, derp." You failed, but you won't shut up - you'll keep screeching like a little bitch. You're the biggest loser on this board, and the least respected asswipe on the right, chump change.

Amazing anyone would take the time to write such outright lies, empty drivel and bulls***.

Who was pointing the "gun" pointed at Eastern Europe's head, moonbat?

Who exactly was threatening them with nukes?

Cite expressions of fear among the citizens there.

Cite news stories documenting the fear and intimidation.

And India just voted in a strongly Free Market Prime Minister. Where's the gun that was pointed at India's head?

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2014 5:20 am » wrote: .....Hey, ***: REAGAN DID NOT SPEND BILLIONS OF YEN DEFEATING THE USSR, JUST TO TURN RIGHT AROUND AND ALLOW THE DISINTEGRATED STATES IT SHED TO CONTINUE PRACTICING SOCIALISM, YOU IGNORANT, ROMANTIC, ELEVEN YEAR OLD GIRL

Your effeminate pretense that our fallen foes had a "choice" about remaining socialist is flowery girlishness even by YOUR blatantly homosexual standards, clemspew.

Oh, so you've reversed course yet again and are claiming that it was Reagan who was threatening to nuke them.

From his ranch in California?

Because he was many years out of office when Eastern Europe chose Free Market policies.

So what psychotic bulls*** will you write now? I'm getting whiplash from your wild swings back and forth; yes, they were afraid of being nuked. No, they weren't.


It was evil NATO! No, it wasn't.

It was that nasty Ronald Reagan! No, never mind. Yes it was!

When they finally loosen your restraints, maybe you could give a consistent, coherent, honest answer.

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 9:56 am » wrote: Oh, so you've reversed course yet again and are claiming that it was Reagan who was threatening to nuke them.

From his ranch in California?

Because he was many years out of office when Eastern Europe chose Free Market policies.

So what psychotic bulls*** will you write now? I'm getting whiplash from your wild swings back and forth; yes, they were afraid of being nuked. No, they weren't.

It was evil NATO! No, it wasn't.

It was that nasty Ronald Reagan! No, never mind. Yes it was!

When they finally loosen your restraints, maybe you could give a consistent, coherent, honest answer.

Hooey

Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2014 1:58 am » wrote:And if capitalism is so great, why is it introduced through tinpot dictators imposed on voters by foreign coup plots, every **** time?

Gosh, who was that awful dictator who imposed it on the US at the Founding?

Which dictator imposed it recently in India, which just elected a Free Market Prime Minister?

Which dictator imposed it in Ireland not many years ago?

As usual, another **** who is completely and utterly clueless about what capitalism is.

Vegas » 16 Sep 2014 5:37 pm » wrote:As usual, another **** who is completely and utterly clueless about what capitalism is.

I believe the dictionary meaning is "evil incarnate." However, you can't blame people for being confused as a result of this Singapore meme.

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 3:46 pm » wrote:
Gosh, who was that awful dictator who imposed it on the US at the Founding?

Which dictator imposed it recently in India, which just elected a Free Market Prime Minister?

Which dictator imposed it in Ireland not many years ago?

Ireland is socialist, moron. The election of one guy that one of your *** websites approve of is not a revolution, moron - just an election. And your ignorance of our founding is quite telling, puke. Not only had the word not yet been invented (though the system had, as witnessed by the british east india company and the dutch east india company), but no mention of a capitalist economy is in our founding documents - NOR IS ANY PROVISION MADE FOR IT. It was not until 1817 that the original "buttonwood agreement" crew formed the NYSE - two generations after the Declaration of Independence.

Retard.

And something else for those competent to ponder (You're excused, Glory Hole): Main Streets problems mean jack **** to wall street - yet those **** playing filthy crashes OUR economy? You morons don't think something is out of whack? If that's the case, go find kenny lay and suck his dick - it tastes rich, so you **** will love it.

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 8:22 am » wrote: Amazing anyone would take the time to write such outright lies, empty drivel and bulls***.

Who was pointing the "gun" pointed at Eastern Europe's head, moonbat?

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 8:22 am » wrote:Who exactly was threatening them with nukes?

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 8:22 am » wrote:Cite expressions of fear among the citizens there.

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 8:22 am » wrote: Cite news stories documenting the fear and intimidation.

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

RichClem » 16 Sep 2014 8:22 am » wrote:And India just voted in a strongly Free Market Prime Minister. Where's the gun that was pointed at India's head?

One guy got voted in, whom YOU say (actually, your *** sites that forced you to defend socialized medicine say) is "Free-Market." You ***, what does that MEAN in your homosexual argot?

Name the prime ministers of india who were NOT "Free Market" (whatever that means to a *** like you, dick sucker).

Cannonpointer » 17 Sep 2014 5:30 am » wrote: The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

How do you know they were still pointed at Eastern Europe, moonbat? Those countries' governments were no longer our enemy.

Where is any evidence they felt so threatened they'd vote for an "economically oppressive" system of government?

Where is any evidence of the expressions of said intimidation by those doing the intimidating?

Who was doing the bullying, Reagan from retirement on his ranch? That evil, dastardly George H. Bush?

NATO? Who, psycho?

Where any evidence of expressions of fear by voters?

Where is any evidence of the expressions of outrage by their elected representatives?

Where are the angry US news stories to report this bullying?

Where were human rights groups decrying this intimidation?

Surely you can provide vast documentation of this gross violation of human rights.

Rather than your usual evasions and psychotic ranting.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

Strange, I didn't see any such thing.

Must be a figment of your psychotic imagination running away with you again.

Cannonpointer » 17 Sep 2014 5:30 am » wrote: The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

The U.S. had multiple missile batteries pointed at the east bloc and the ussr for decades. So did NATO.

I have provided you with a link to each of the SCORES of known missile sites, complete with a list of missiles, their pay load, the date they went operational and the date - IF ANY - they stood down. What more can I POSSIBLY show you, you fear-belching little ***?

Gosh, you took the time to write all that psychotic bulls*** but somehow didn't answer a single question. Surely that's just an unintentional oversight.

Here, try again.

Who exactly was threatening them with nukes?

Cite expressions of fear among the citizens there.

Cite news stories documenting the fear and intimidation.

One guy got voted in, whom YOU say (actually, your *** sites that forced you to defend socialized medicine say) is "Free-Market." You ***, what does that MEAN in your homosexual argot?

Oh well, then just continue living in your psychotic world of make believe.

Name the prime ministers of india who were NOT "Free Market" (whatever that means to a *** like you, dick sucker).

The country has followed the Socialistic/Soviet model for many decades.

Go read something once in a while.