Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Singapore: The Bell They Cannot Unring
Singapore: The Bell They Cannot Unring
By Cannonpointer
29 Jul 2014 5:25 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Jul 2022 6:19 pm
Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The machine gets rid of threads that have not been hit in a year - just a bit of house-keeping. Why should I have to generate these important, well-argued theses twice?
As to them defending socialism, I have yet to see anyone on this board honest enough AND intelligent enough to agree to a definition and stick to it.
For example, midwits INSIST that the man who saved capitlism - the very best friend that capitalism ever had - was a soshalust.
That would be FDR - under whose game rules we had zero bank bailouts for 50 years, and the scrapping of whose game rules by reagan saw chronic bailouts commence before reagan even left office (or, SOSHALIZUM).
So, we're gonna have to agree to disagree that I have defended that which you cannot even define (and then stick with that definition, ongoingly).
You had too many shots today.
8 Jul 2022 6:44 pm
I take that as a no on you defining the soshalizum you claim I am defending.roadkill » 08 Jul 2022, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑You had too many shots today.Cannonpointer » 08 Jul 2022, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The machine gets rid of threads that have not been hit in a year - just a bit of house-keeping. Why should I have to generate these important, well-argued theses twice?
As to them defending socialism, I have yet to see anyone on this board honest enough AND intelligent enough to agree to a definition and stick to it.
For example, midwits INSIST that the man who saved capitlism - the very best friend that capitalism ever had - was a soshalust.
That would be FDR - under whose game rules we had zero bank bailouts for 50 years, and the scrapping of whose game rules by reagan saw chronic bailouts commence before reagan even left office (or, SOSHALIZUM).
So, we're gonna have to agree to disagree that I have defended that which you cannot even define (and then stick with that definition, ongoingly).
If you can't define it, you can't accuse me of defending it.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 1516 users online :: 21 registered, 13 bots, and 1482 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, roadkill, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, MR-7, *Beekeeper, Skans, murdock, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, 31st Arrival, Fuelman
Bots: facebookexternalhit, TTD-Content, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, proximic, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, BLEXBot, bingbot