Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:07 pm » wrote: Sorry, queer - that is YOUR narrative that YOU brag about constantly - how Reagan beat the USSR by creating constant existential threats through a never ending arms race. I am not going to tell your slobbering story, ***.

Now, answer the question:

If capitalism is so great, how come it always has to overthrow LEGALLY ELECTED socialist governments and IMPOSE ITSELF upon populations?

How come socialism always wins at the BALLOT BOX and capitalism relies on the GUN, ***?

This is what passes for "clever" in moonbat-land.

No one forced Eastern Europe to choose Free Market policies. They did so voluntarily.

Everyone with eyes can see your hopeless blabbering, evasions and deceit.

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 4:11 pm » wrote: No one forced Eastern Europe to choose Free Market policies. They did so voluntarily.

So, a homosexual pretending that there were not thousands of NATO midrange ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads pointing at them - and pretending that their union had not COLLAPSED under the weight of a western-instigated arms race (a narrative which YOU, PERSONALLY have bragged about but now try to lie uour wayout of, you dishonest scum) - that makes everything they did "voluntary?"



If Capitalism is so great, why must it always go AGAINST the ballot box and dominate with BULLETS, nations which rejected it with BALLOTS?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:16 pm » wrote: So, a homosexual pretending that there were not thousands of NATO midrange ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads pointing at them - and pretending that their union had not COLLAPSED under the weight of a western-instigated arms race (a narrative which YOU, PERSONALLY have bragged about but now try to lie uour wayout of, you dishonest scum) - that makes everything they did "voluntary?"

.
Oh, I see, they were afraid that George H. Bush was going to nuke them if they didn't choose Free Market policies.

Hey, that's believable.

If Capitalism is so great, why must it always go AGAINST the ballot box and dominate with BULLETS, nations which rejected it with BALLOTS?

If you're so brilliant, why do you have to lie constantly to pretend you win debates?

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 4:36 pm » wrote:
.
Oh, I see, they were afraid that George H. Bush was going to nuke them if they didn't choose Free Market policies.

Hey, that's believable.

It's your narrative.

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

ANSWER THE QUESTIUONS, GLORY HOLE. QUITE EVADING.

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:38 pm » wrote: It's your narrative.

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

ANSWER THE QUESTIUONS, GLORY HOLE. QUITE EVADING.

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

No, no, it's worse than that.

We'll nuke them if they don't follow Free Market policies.

That's why Greece and Spain are in such a shambles. It's a post-nuclear holocaust!

Is this the best you can do, you pathetic little dweeb?

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 4:45 pm » wrote:
No, no, it's worse than that.

We'll nuke them if they don't follow Free Market policies.

That's why Greece and Spain are in such a shambles. It's a post-nuclear holocaust!

Is this the best you can do, you pathetic little dweeb?

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:46 pm » wrote:
If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

.

Yes, yes, you will repeat your psychotic bulls*** without regard to reality.

Pathetic little dweeb.

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 4:51 pm » wrote: Yes, yes, you will repeat your psychotic bulls*** without regard to reality.

My information comes from YOU, closet queen. YOU are the one who bragged that Pinochet was a tinpot dictator representing capitalism and using bullets to quash ballots.

YOU are the one who bragged that the east bloc was crushed under the weight of a hostile arms race that reagan waged. Now, answer the question that YOUR NARRATIVE naturally gives rise to, scared little dodge-baller:

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:55 pm » wrote: My information comes from YOU, closet queen. YOU are the one who bragged that Pinochet was a tinpot dictator representing capitalism and using bullets to quash ballots.

No, that's just your psychotic version of reality, thrown into a blender.

YOU are the one who bragged that the east bloc was crushed under the weight of a hostile arms race that reagan waged. Now, answer the question that YOUR NARRATIVE naturally gives rise to, scared little dodge-baller:

No, troll, Reagan freed them to make their own choice. Clearly you still resent that.

You're the psychotic who claims they chose Free Market years later because they were afraid of being nuked.

If Capitalism is so wonderful, why must it always impose itself with a gun? Why does it always lose at the ballot box and require coups to implement?

Why are you so mentally ill and dishonest?

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 5:04 pm » wrote:
No, that's just your psychotic version of reality, thrown into a blender.

No, troll, Reagan freed them to make their own choice. Clearly you still resent that.

You're the psychotic who claims they chose Free Market years later because they were afraid of being nuked.

Why are you so mentally ill and dishonest?

Ah HA!

So you are amending your boast from reagan crushed them to reagen "freed" them. I guess he :"freed" them the way pinochet "freed" chile, huh, ***?

If capitalism is so great, clown, why does it always have to "free" people with bullets from the decisions they made with BALLOTS?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 5:15 pm » wrote: Ah HA!

So you are amending your boast from reagan crushed them to reagen "freed" them.

I never claimed that Reagan crushed Eastern Europe, absolutely not its people, who love Reagan. Gosh, why would they love someone who "crushed" them, if your psychotic account is to be believed?

But mere facts never get in your way.

I guess he :"freed" them the way pinochet "freed" chile, huh, ***? [/quote

Even the Chilean Left admits he saved them from a Communist dictatorship.

Why are you so mentally ill and dishonest?

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 5:28 pm » wrote:
I never claimed that Reagan crushed Eastern Europe, absolutely not its people, who love Reagan. Gosh, why would they love someone who "crushed" them,

Oh, I see, little fraud boy. I have a tough time keeping up with your radically changing narratives and definitions. You wake up in a new world every day.

So in today's new world, reagan was a PATRICIAN, practicing NOBLESSE OBLIGE on my dime, you welfare ***?

Why did your gay hero transfer my wealth to those people? How do you justify this status welfare, homospew?

Also, if capitalism is so good, why doe sit always have to crush elected governments in order to get implemented - and why do the replacement governments need to brutalize the population?

Why are 88% of singaporeans forced to live in over-priced government housing?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 5:35 pm » wrote: Oh, I see, little fraud boy. I have a tough time keeping up with your radically changing narratives and definitions. You wake up in a new world every day.

So in today's new world, reagan was a PATRICIAN, practicing NOBLESSE OBLIGE on my dime, you welfare ***?

Why did your gay hero transfer my wealth to those people? How do you justify this status welfare, homospew?

Also, if capitalism is so good, why doe sit always have to crush elected governments in order to get implemented - and why do the replacement governments need to brutalize the population?

Why are 88% of singaporeans forced to live in over-priced government housing?

Why are you so mentally ill and dishonest?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 5:35 pm » wrote:Why are 88% of singaporeans forced to live in over-priced government housing?

Why do you get so bitterly angry about a system that you espouse, and I oppose?

Answer: because you're psychotic and dishonest.

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 6:12 pm » wrote: Why do you get so bitterly angry about a system that you espouse, and I oppose?

Gosh, you OPPOSE singapore's police state and I ESPOUSE it?

What A lying little *** you alway are, bathroom clemtard.

RichClem » 12 Aug 2014 6:09 pm » wrote: Why am I so mentally ill and dishonest?

Bla bla.

IF CAPITALISM IS SO GREAT, CONJOB, WHY MUST IT ALWAYS BE IMPOZSED BY THE GUN INSTEAD OF VOTED ON IN FREE ELECTIONS? WHY DO PEOPLE ALWAYS REJECT IT AT THE BALLOT BOX AND ONLY ACCEPT IT WHEN BULLIED BY ARMIES OR HAVE IN IMPOSED ON THEM BY DICTATORS WHO ANSWER TO CORPORATIONS?

Answer, ypu little dishonest ***.

RichClem » 29 Jul 2014 9:27 am » wrote:
There's the kiss of death.


"Blindly?" I support it because from decades of reading its publications, I've found it to be factually accurate and broadly fair.

You're complimenting a lying, raving psychotic. I guess that makes you "the cream of the crop?"

Decades of reading publications?

I can produce a dozen products VASTLY more efficiently than any corporation could ever dream, without destroying the environment, and so could half the people on this forum. Why on earth do we rely on entities that care ONLY about money, when we don't need them or the cancer they force on us every day?

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 9:43 pm » wrote: Gosh, you OPPOSE singapore's police state and I ESPOUSE it?

What A lying little *** you alway are, bathroom clemtard.

You're a self described Socialist.

Their housing sector is Socialized. Why aren't your proud of it?

Answer: you're a hopeless lying troll.

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 9:46 pm » wrote: Bla bla.

IF CAPITALISM IS SO GREAT, CONJOB, WHY MUST IT ALWAYS BE IMPOZSED BY THE GUN INSTEAD OF VOTED ON IN FREE ELECTIONS? WHY DO PEOPLE ALWAYS REJECT IT AT THE BALLOT BOX AND ONLY ACCEPT IT WHEN BULLIED BY ARMIES OR HAVE IN IMPOSED ON THEM BY DICTATORS WHO ANSWER TO CORPORATIONS?

Answer, ypu little dishonest ***.

There is no answer to mental illness and lack of integrity.

But it is really amusing that you claim Eastern Europe chose Free Market Capitalism because they were afraid Bush was going to nuke them.

That's quite a psychosis you have going.

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2014 4:55 pm » wrote: My information comes from YOU, closet queen. YOU are the one who bragged that Pinochet was a tinpot dictator representing capitalism and using bullets to quash ballots.

YOU are the one who bragged that the east bloc was crushed under the weight of a hostile arms race that reagan waged.

I never, ever claimed that the East Bloc was crushed. We never threatened them.

It was the Soviet Union we threatened and crushed, and once that was gone, we were no threat at all to Eastern Europe.

Which unanimously chose Free Market policies over your silly failed Socialism of their own free will.

But you stupidly lie that they did so because George W. Bush was threatening to nuke them.

That's enough to get you put on a Thorazine drip.