Skans » 12 Apr 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ So, if any of you Conservatives doubt for an instance that your switching beers from Budweiser / InBev to some other Beer isn't having any affect, THEN READ THESE HEADLINES!!!
"Bud Light Backlash Hits Beer Suppliers" - Yahoo Finance
"Anheuser-Busch Loses $3 Billion In Market Value As Backlash Grows Over Dylan Mulvaney's Bud Light Partnership" - Radar Online
"Budweiser Clydesdales events canceled over security concerns amid Dylan Mulvaney backlash" - Washington Times
"The Bud Light Boycott Explained as much as possible" - Vox
"Bud Light's transgender pandering was a predictable mistake" - Washington Examiner
"Anheuser-Busch Stock Drops Amid Bud Light Dylan Mulvaney Controversy" - Newsweek
"Bud Light volume declines negative for Ball Corp., says Truist" - The Fly
"Anti-Trans Sentiment Can't Hold Bud Light Maker Down Amid Dylan Mulvaney Controversy: The Bull, Bear Case" - MSN (Now, if that's not an endorsement to short BUD!)
"Bud Light backlash could hit beer suppliers" - Fox Business
"Why Does The Bud Light Backlash Feel So Desperate?" - Forbes
"What the Bud Light backlash has in common with today’s Republican Party" - Washington Post
"Video of steamroller destroying beer cans not related to Bud Light controversy" - KHOU*11
"Bud Light distributors ‘spooked’ by backlash to Dylan Mulvaney partnership" - New York Post
"Bud Light Goes Silent Online Amid Dylan Mulvaney Backlash" - Newsweek
But, but, but, I used paragraphs and punctuation.Taipan » 13 Apr 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ I get your point.
Next time........please try to be a little more clear.
That is all.
That was a good clip!RayJJohnson » 13 Apr 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Bud Light's sales prevention strategy.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57Jtp3bGLbE
You're a good man. You should always make sure I'm on my toes and up for the fight. You wouldn't want a "dead weight" partner distracting you in a gunfight, would you.Taipan » 13 Apr 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ LOL.............
You win, cowboy.
I am always on your side !!
But,
you always knew that fact, didn't you?
Skans » 13 Apr 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ You're a good man. You should always make sure I'm on my toes and up for the fight. You wouldn't want a "dead weight" partner distracting you in a gunfight, would you.
Skans » 13 Apr 2023, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ IT'S NOT A COMFORT DOG. She's identifies as an Emotional Support Animal.
Why don't you offer some proof, then?
I suggest that 3 billion is quite a bit LESS than $5 billion.
Xavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you offer some proof, then?
I suspect, dumbduck, that you are too dumb to even know where to find such information.
Google is your friend assholeXavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you offer some proof, then?
I suspect, dumbduck, that you are too dumb to even know where to find such information.
As a teen, I remember well hunkering down in the basement with my Ramones records, a bottle of Jack and a bag of weed until the dark cloud of Disco passed over the land... Disco Demolition Night at Comiskey Park in Chicago was the official death of Disco...Skans » 12 Apr 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ In this case, I'm only reporting what the news headlines are reporting. This boycott of InBev beers and Buttweiser is actually working. The media is paying attention. And, InBev execs have gone silent. They are hoping, PRAYING this **** just blows over before their quarter is completely ruined.
When I was a little kid, I remember something called "Disco Demolition". All of the sudden everyone hated Disco. It was quite sudden and that was the end of Disco. I really don't even know how it started. I didn't know what it was all about until later on. But, that's whats going on here - Buttweiser Destruction. Suddenly, Conservative beer drinkers realize just how easy it is to stick it to the woke, tranny-loving, companies that are total pussies for embracing this ****.
I say let Buttweiser have the *** and the trannies. Let's see how much beer they drink in in the long run. How much beer money are these **** who still live in their parent's basements, spending their money on pot and coffee-house kratum drinks, going to have for sucking on Buttweiser Tranny-spooge beer?
This NY POST piece is from yesterday....Xavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you offer some proof, then?
I suspect, dumbduck, that you are too dumb to even know where to find such information.
That was a few days ago, I suggest that 6 billion is even more than 5 billion..Xavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I suggest that 3 billion is quite a bit LESS than $5 billion.
LOL - it's 5 Billion. I did my research, now you should do yours. Hey, I told you to short BUD.Xavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I suggest that 3 billion is quite a bit LESS than $5 billion.
