Liberal Forum

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:28 am

I gotta say, I am still going to drink Bud Light. It's not the beer's fault that the company is full of morons. It's good beer. What did the beer itself do?

Rat Piss drinkers drink that Rat Piss.
 ... now it's tranny approved too!

Skans » 14 Apr 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 3:22 pm

Heineken is not made by InBev, and Amstel is owned by Heineken. 
Kirin is not made by InBev.  It is a subsidiary of a subsidiary of the Mitsubishi Group.

As for Corona - you're right, I'm going to have to edit the list - dang, I like Corona too.

Snoop Dogg blows dead bears...

None, ****. Beer isn't supposed to be PC in the first place...just beer, nothing more.
Go and douche, PLEASE. Smells like it's about time, Nancy. 
BTW, you're a slow one.   

RedheadedStranger » 14 Apr 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 3:36 pm

Heineken and Amstel are both still made by Heineken, but they are distributed in the US by AB InBev distributors. AB held the distribution rights before InBev ever came into the picture actually.

The Kirin beer sold in the US is made in the US by AB InBev under license from the Mitsubishi Group.

There was a big lawsuit several years ago over AB selling Kirin as an "imported" brew, when it wasn't, since it was being made in the States and not Japan.

The Mitsubishi Group still owns the brand, but AB makes, bottles, and distributes it in the U.S. from what I remember.

AB InBev holds distribution rights on a ton of brands that they don't actually own, especially in the craft market. They are a monster of a company, and have their fingers in a lot of different pies.

I can believe that about the distribution.  What I can't believe is how a foreign company got away with taking over this much of the American Beer market without an anti-trust lawsuit being brought against them.
 

Skans » 14 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm

I can believe that about the distribution.  What I can't believe is how a foreign company got away with taking over this much of the American Beer market without an anti-trust lawsuit being brought against them.

The antitrust litigation is the only reason they don't own the Miller brands at this point.

They wanted that too when they bought SABMiller, but the courts said no.

InBev is about as close to a monopoly as you can get, without calling it a monopoly.

This is why they could give a **** less about pissing off the Bud Light drinkers.
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Apr 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 9:04 pm

The antitrust litigation is the only reason they don't own the Miller brands at this point.

They wanted that too when they bought SABMiller, but the courts said no.

InBev is about as close to a monopoly as you can get, without calling it a monopoly.

This is why they could give a **** less about pissing off the Bud Light drinkers.

You know what I say?  **** 'em anyway.
 

DeezerShoove » 14 Apr 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 7:44 pm

Rat Piss drinkers drink that Rat Piss.
 ... now it's tranny approved too!

 I just have always been a Bud drinker. I even named my cat "Bud" when I was single in the early 90s. I am not about to change because of some stupid decision that a marketer made. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 10:30 pm

 I just have always been a Bud drinker. I even named my cat "Bud" when I was single in the early 90s. I am not about to change because of some stupid decision that a marketer made.

The company allowed this propaganda **** to go out to the public on purpose.
**** them and everyone there.
I make it my mission to try to remember to be the other side of the double-edged sword.
In other words, the cancel culture needs to work in both directions.

For one, I will never knowingly use a Gillette product ever again. They really pissed me off.
You can be stepped on all you want. Marginalized. I find that off-putting.

DeezerShoove » 14 Apr 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 10:55 pm

The company allowed this propaganda **** to go out to the public on purpose.
**** them and everyone there.
I make it my mission to try to remember to be the other side of the double-edged sword.
In other words, the cancel culture needs to work in both directions.

For one, I will never knowingly use a Gillette product ever again. They really pissed me off.
You can be stepped on all you want. Marginalized. I find that off-putting.

I am not allowing myself to be stepped on. Trannies didn't make the product. Some really great people who knew their **** did. Why punish their achievements and legacy, by contributing to the demise of their ingenuity, because the suits in the big office are woke idiots? 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:05 pm

I am not allowing myself to be stepped on. Trannies didn't make the product. Some really great people who knew their **** did. Why punish their achievements and legacy, by contributing to the demise of their ingenuity, because the suits in the big office are woke idiots?

Because their company is cancer.
Maybe it wasn't when you named your cat. It is now.

DeezerShoove » 14 Apr 2023, 11:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:07 pm

Because their company is cancer.
Maybe it wasn't when you named your cat. It is now.

Gay. The genius behind the beer's creation and quality is still the same. You are putting yourself in a lose -lose situation. 

You aren't hurting the company by boycotting them. Instead, you are exposing yourself as someone who finds more value in vindictive reactions, than in respect for genius innovators. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:05 pm

I am not allowing myself to be stepped on. Trannies didn't make the product. Some really great people who knew their **** did. Why punish their achievements and legacy, by contributing to the demise of their ingenuity, because the suits in the big office are woke idiots?

Vegas- I don't think you are really getting the picture here. This is more then a tranny on a can.
It's the arm of the gubmint- holding these companies hostage for and ESG score.
They get graded by a score. Do what the gubmint wants or else...

Get a high score and reap all the goodies... pay o la money- bonuses for the ceo's.
Get a low score and not play along- Loose all the goodies. No loans for investments- no gubmint corporate welfare etc etc.

This is the BIDEN admin's agenda being forced on these companies.
You don't reallly think Budweiser cares about Trannies do ya? Or it, in any way would help their sales... 
The ESG scores are starting up in banks... Next it's us. if you're not a good woke citizen- no loan for you!
 
This Tranny on the can is a great thing. It's exposing this ESG ****. It's made the news... finally. Folks out there- living their busy lives- dont even know this is going on!

sootedupCyndi » 14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm

Vegas- I don't think you are really getting the picture here. This is more then a tranny on a can.
It's the arm of the gubmint- holding these companies hostage for and ESG score.
They get graded by a score. Do what the gubmint wants or else...

Get a high score and reap all the goodies... pay o la money- bonuses for the ceo's.
Get a low score and not play along- Loose all the goodies. No loans for investments- no gubmint corporate welfare etc etc.

This is the BIDEN admin's agenda being forced on these companies.
You don't reallly think Budweiser cares about Trannies do ya? Or it, in any way would help their sales... 
The ESG scores are starting up in banks... Next it's us. if you're not a good woke citizen- no loan for you!

It's Fascism. No other way to look at it.

RedheadedStranger » 14 Apr 2023, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:27 pm

It's Fascism. No other way to look at it.

Right. exactly!
more control over bidness.- all of us. 
 

sootedupCyndi » 14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm

Vegas- I don't think you are really getting the picture here. This is more then a tranny on a can.
It's the arm of the gubmint- holding these companies hostage for and ESG score.
They get graded by a score. Do what the gubmint wants or else...

Get a high score and reap all the goodies... pay o la money- bonuses for the ceo's.
Get a low score and not play along- Loose all the goodies. No loans for investments- no gubmint corporate welfare etc etc.

 

You pretty much described almost every big corporation since the 70s. 

This is the BIDEN admin's agenda being forced on these companies.
You don't reallly think Budweiser cares about Trannies do ya? Or it, in any way would help their sales... 
The ESG scores are starting up in banks... Next it's us. if you're not a good woke citizen- no loan for you!
 
This Tranny on the can is a great thing. It's exposing this ESG ****. It's made the news... finally. Folks out there- living their busy lives- dont even know this is going on!

I know they don't care about trannies. None of the woke companies do. It's a business move. They are not supposed to care. Caring is bad for business. They are supposed to find the direction the market is going, and then tap it. That's how it works. One simple rule of thumb for businesses: Always go where the money is. 





 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 11:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:32 pm

You pretty much described almost every big corporation since the 70s. 

I know they don't care about trannies. None of the woke companies do. It's a business move. They are not supposed to care. Caring is bad for business. They are supposed to find the direction the market is going, and then tap it. That's how it works. One simple rule of thumb for businesses: Always go where the money is.

no- they're padding their pockets..   you know-  I doubt a tranny on a can is even gonna attract any young liberal men to drink the  beer.LOL
attract a few *** i guess. maybe  
 
 

sootedupCyndi » 14 Apr 2023, 11:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:54 pm

no- they're padding their pockets..   you know-  I doubt a tranny on a can is even gonna attract any young liberal men to drink the  beer.LOL
attract a few *** i guess. maybe

It's a stupid move. I don't disagree. I think they are wrong about the market. I don't think they fully understand the millennials and future Gen Zers. The millennials used to be the generation of tolerance to everybody and all that ****. However, they have changed. Once they started getting into the real world, they have tended to become more traditional. They have a very low divorce rate. Most believe in a nuclear family. They have grown out of their self-absorbed and narrow views and into a more civic oriented perspective.  They are liberal, but they are not progressives. That is the mistake that Bud Light is making. They are seeing them as progressives. I have no issues with liberals, but progressives are scum. 

sootedupCyndi » 14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:25 pm

Vegas- I don't think you are really getting the picture here. This is more then a tranny on a can.
It's the arm of the gubmint- holding these companies hostage for and ESG score.
They get graded by a score. Do what the gubmint wants or else...

Get a high score and reap all the goodies... pay o la money- bonuses for the ceo's.
Get a low score and not play along- Loose all the goodies. No loans for investments- no gubmint corporate welfare etc etc.

This is the BIDEN admin's agenda being forced on these companies.
You don't reallly think Budweiser cares about Trannies do ya? Or it, in any way would help their sales... 
The ESG scores are starting up in banks... Next it's us. if you're not a good woke citizen- no loan for you!
 
This Tranny on the can is a great thing. It's exposing this ESG ****. It's made the news... finally. Folks out there- living their busy lives- dont even know this is going on!

That's right, it's getting scary, I have seen it happen... first they came for the lease cars, they are all EV now, then they came for HR, no more just male/female, you get to pick your own gender now, then they came for the catering, no more meat, only vegan crap and cricket burgers, I'm not kidding you.. and the latest move is to outlaw soda cans.. oh, of course tranny day (month?) was celebrated too on the company website, there is no escape... but they succeeded, my job should be safe now.. phew...

 

 
 
 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2023, 11:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2023, 11:19 pm

Gay. The genius behind the beer's creation and quality is still the same. You are putting yourself in a lose -lose situation. 

You aren't hurting the company by boycotting them. Instead, you are exposing yourself as someone who finds more value in vindictive reactions, than in respect for genius innovators.

The genius was lost long ago.
It is a multi-national corporation with hundreds of brands sustained by work-a-day schlubs.
I am reacting in kind with the only weapon they respect: my money.

They also do not give a **** about trannies. They see market share (which is all you are).
That twat marketing broad even said as much. Re-watch her statements on twitter if you have to.
When they try to couple social engineering with market share, I say bye-bye.

I don't appreciate being told what to think with my own money.

DeezerShoove » 15 Apr 2023, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2023, 6:51 am

The genius was lost long ago.
 

The **** it was. It's the same damn beer. What, do you think they added dog **** or some other ingredient to make it different?

It is a multi-national corporation with hundreds of brands sustained by work-a-day schlubs.
I am reacting in kind with the only weapon they respect: my money.

And nobody cares. The only people you are hurting are their drivers, factory workers, and store stockers who have nothing to do with any of it. How do you think they are going to make up for the loss of sales? The CEOs sure as hell are not going to take a pay cut.

They also do not give a **** about trannies. They see market share (which is all you are).

Of course they don't. None of the woke companies do. It's a business move. Caring is not good business. They are following the money. That's just how business works. Most of the market are now millennials and the future Gen Zers. Boomers and GenX are now a small piece of their sales. 

That twat marketing broad even said as much. Re-watch her statements on twitter if you have to.
When they try to couple social engineering with market share, I say bye-bye.

That goes both ways. Are they social engineering the market, or is the market engineering and guiding them? They didn't create trannies. They are responding to what they think people want. Businesses have been doing this for centuries.  They did the same thing with us GenXers and boomers. We were more of the masculine type. So, they marketed it all toward the common masculine man. Remember those 'real men of genius' commercials of that voice saying "we solute you _______" fill in with a common person, with a menial job, who did some simple, but important job. GenX and Boomers related.  Now, society has changed. Thus, they are shifting toward the change. This is nothing new. 

I don't appreciate being told what to think with my own money.

Ohhhh you would be surprised as to why you spend your money on certain things. Marketers use creative subliminal tactics. You and many others, including myself, are always being told what to do with our money, and we fall for it, daily.