No, I'm 70. The 1970's were 40+ years ago.
if I can destroy your god with my thoughts then your god is an impotent god.Beekeeper » 16 Apr 2023, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Then you feel FREE to "destroy" GOD all you want because YOU are the one who pays THAT price when YOUR time comes to answer for your SINS IN LIFE!! And this is a HUGE ONE, dolt!! And God never "impregnated" any 13 year old, *******!! The Scriptures NEVER stated her AGE. Nowhere. But you and your NAZI ILK love to "speculate" and call if "Fact". Kneegrow NAZIS love that ****!
Oh, and "marriage' of a 12 year old is a HUMAN concept, not one from GOD. But you believe that ANY 12 year old MUST DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES if they want to be a boy or a girl and have 100% CONTROL OVER THAT and any SURGERY or MEDS they get, which is FAR MORE LIFE ALTERING than a marriage at that age!!! And the lawmaker is 100% CORRECT in that the PARENTS MUST BE INVOLVED IN ALL DECISIONS OF A MINOR CHILD, yet YOUR BELIEF is that they are capable of ANY DECISION that alters their GENDER without any parental involvement??
You are ONE MASSIVELY CONFUSED AND MORONIC POS there, GROOMER!!!
Child marriage is a conservative groomer concept, daughter fiddler, endorsed by your sicko, pedophile god who impregnated a thirteen year old child. And you applaud this delusion.Beekeeper » 16 Apr 2023, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Then you feel FREE to "destroy" GOD all you want because YOU are the one who pays THAT price when YOUR time comes to answer for your SINS IN LIFE!! And this is a HUGE ONE, dolt!! And God never "impregnated" any 13 year old, *******!! The Scriptures NEVER stated her AGE. Nowhere. But you and your NAZI ILK love to "speculate" and call if "Fact". Kneegrow NAZIS love that ****!
Oh, and "marriage' of a 12 year old is a HUMAN concept, not one from GOD. But you believe that ANY 12 year old MUST DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES if they want to be a boy or a girl and have 100% CONTROL OVER THAT and any SURGERY or MEDS they get, which is FAR MORE LIFE ALTERING than a marriage at that age!!! And the lawmaker is 100% CORRECT in that the PARENTS MUST BE INVOLVED IN ALL DECISIONS OF A MINOR CHILD, yet YOUR BELIEF is that they are capable of ANY DECISION that alters their GENDER without any parental involvement??
You are ONE MASSIVELY CONFUSED AND MORONIC POS there, GROOMER!!!
Agreed. But *** challenged to find a porn star reading to kids,,,,and then he would reevaluate his position.ROG62 » 16 Apr 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ IMO, if she's just there to read books in a proper manner, IE, not dressed like a stripper and her profession (stripper or porn star) is never brought up, I wouldn't have a problem with that...
Sumela » 16 Apr 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Agreed. But *** challenged to find a porn star reading to kids,,,,and then he would reevaluate his position.
******* rolled himself.
Like this parenting....OdeToJoy » 16 Apr 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ No, I just leave parenting decisions to parents. Their business, not mine.
I am the one preventing people from sexualizing my children, and I am the **** parent.Pastafarian » 16 Apr 2023, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ You are either childless or a terrible parent.
Do you always leave your young children unattended? Or just when it is inconvenient for you?
OdeToJoy » 16 Apr 2023, 3:22 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, the thread is about Library Story Time. Anybody who wants to rent a library room and read to kids, then the parents make the judgement.
I, personally, would not choose to take my great grandchildren to see Kirk Cameron, because I disagree with everything he espouses, but a lot of people like him. And I certainly would never interfere with that. Just like I don't interfere with whatever other people are deciding about their children.
Not a single thing you just said in this is BASED ON ANY LEVEL OF FACT!!Pastafarian » 16 Apr 2023, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Child marriage is a conservative groomer concept, daughter fiddler, endorsed by your sicko, pedophile god who impregnated a thirteen year old child. And you applaud this delusion.
totally understood...Sumela » 16 Apr 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Agreed. But *** challenged to find a porn star reading to kids,,,,and then he would reevaluate his position.
******* rolled himself.
Duly noted...OdeToJoy » 16 Apr 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ No, I'm 70. The 1970's were 40+ years ago.
All of my children were born in the 1970's.
Sumela » 15 Apr 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ This is the goal of liberals for all young girls.....Sacrifice at The Alter of LGBTQ

Yeah, right! You sound totally genuine!OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, I am a devout Christian. Just not an Evangelical Nut Job.
OdeToJoy » 16 Apr 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ No, I'm 70. The 1970's were 40+ years ago.
All of my children were born in the 1970's.
Not sure if you saw Ode to Cock's fake post about white nationalists taking over "her" gardening forum. This is one of the dumbest posts I've ever read.Vegas » 26 Sep 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ She isn't genuine. I have exposed her regularly as a hypocrite. One of the most prolific hypocrites on this board or from the left in general. She knows what Jesus thinks of hypocrites. He was very clear that they are going to hell. I tried to warn her, but she refuses to repent.
Ode to Joy
I remember a gardening forum that had a political subforum. They allowed pretty much anything except bad language and sexual content.
There was a whole lot of White Nationalists that had pretty much taken over that subforum. The small seed company, that owned the forum, didn't take much notice until they started getting bad reviews and threatened boycotts by offended gardeners. They shut that down, and later shut down the whole gardening forum. They certainly didn't want THAT following them around.
viewtopic.php?p=2014479#p2014479
LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ Not sure if you saw Ode to Cock's fake post about white nationalists taking over "her" gardening forum. This is one of the dumbest posts I've ever read.
OdeToJoy » 16 Apr 2023, 3:22 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, the thread is about Library Story Time. Anybody who wants to rent a library room and read to kids, then the parents make the judgement.
I, personally, would not choose to take my great grandchildren to see Kirk Cameron, because I disagree with everything he espouses, but a lot of people like him. And I certainly would never interfere with that. Just like I don't interfere with whatever other people are deciding about their children.
what is so freaking important that Kirk Cameron wants to read to kids?jerrab » 26 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ what is so freaking important that drag queens want to read to kids?