Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
I have a fair question for the progressives.
I have a fair question for the progressives.
By Vegas
14 Apr 2023 11:00 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Apr 2023 8:31 pm
HAHA, you gut busted. Poor lil lib always the fraud. *******OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Former porn star:
The actress looks like she’s trying to go straight. TMZ reports she hasn’t made a porn film in two years and has been seen recently in such standard fare as “Entourage,” a series on HBO.
""show me a porn star....then we can talk"""
15 Apr 2023 8:34 pm
15 Apr 2023 8:48 pm
Yes, and I talked about it. She has been outed, and the parents can decide whether they want her to read to their children.Sumela » 15 Apr 2023, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ HAHA, you gut busted. Poor lil lib always the fraud. *******
""show me a porn star....then we can talk"""
If she rents a reading library room, and nobody shows up, then the parents will have made the decision.
I would have a bigger problem with the Falwells being around children. Those people are just plain nasty.
15 Apr 2023 8:50 pm
HAHA - your ******* set yourself up. Moron...OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, and I talked about it. She has been outed, and the parents can decide whether they want her to read to their children.
If she rents a library room, and nobody shows up, then the parents will have made the decision.
15 Apr 2023 8:52 pm
Nope. I'm consistent.
15 Apr 2023 8:54 pm
True, you are a consistent child molester
15 Apr 2023 9:02 pm
YOU HAVE TO BE A *** SUPPORTER IF YOU'RE TRYING TO COMPARE THE TWO READINGSOdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Parents are always at the Kirk Cameron's book readings. So, nothing happens there. We are all making a mountain out of a mole hill, etc...etc...
Question: Why do the parents need to be there if there is nothing to worry about? Book readings do not require parental permission or their presence. Teachers have been doing it for centuries.
I'm seeing a lot of parents at Kirk Cameron's book reading. Every child is accompanied by an adult. Should they be worried about the content? Do the children need to be protected from Kirk Cameron?
15 Apr 2023 9:10 pm
Nope, I just believe in the right of parents to make those choices for their children. I didn't say Kirk Cameron should be stopped from reading his book to children. The parents made that decision for their children.
I don't get worked up about things. If nobody wants to see this, then nobody will show up. Problem solved.
15 Apr 2023 9:17 pm
LOL, you got rolled GroomerOdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, I just believe in the right of parents to make those choices for their children. I didn't say Kirk Cameron should be stopped from reading his book to children. The parents made that decision for their children.
I don't get worked up about things. If nobody wants to see this, then nobody will show up. Problem solved.
15 Apr 2023 9:26 pm
then you believe that men are to marry women? because that is what Christ said,OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, it did. Responsible parents don't drop off their children anywhere. Pre schoolers have their parents with them whether it is a book reading, birthday party, walking to school, or a sporting event.
When my young children went to the weekly children's movie at the library, I was standing at the back of the room with the rest of the parents. This was back in the 70's. I don't think attitudes have changed since then.
The question was why parents attend book readings? I pointed out that parents, of young children, attend all events with their children.
15 Apr 2023 9:30 pm
Nope, your group got rolled in 2020 and 2022. And you just got rolled in Wisconsin 2023. You got rolled in Kansas 2020. You got rolled in Arizona and Georgia 2020 and 2022..
Where is that MAGA Red Wave that was supposed to happen?
Roll, Baby Roll.
15 Apr 2023 9:39 pm
Good try Groomer, Im not MAGA. Both sides in WASH DC are clowns. You are R v D paradigm clown. a CUCK.OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, your group got rolled in 2020 and 2022. And you just got rolled in Wisconsin 2023. You got rolled in Kansas 2020. You got rolled in Arizona and Georgia 2020 and 2022..
Where is that MAGA Red Wave that was supposed to happen?
Roll, Baby Roll.
WASH DC's empire is crumbling. The world is de-dollarizing and the empire is in PURE PANIC MODE.
Fun times to live in!!!
15 Apr 2023 9:41 pm
jerrab » 15 Apr 2023, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑ then you believe that men are to marry women? because that is what Christ said,
I believe that everyone has a legal right to be with whoever makes them happy. The choices I make do not transfer to others. If a person is gay, don't join an Evangelical church. But otherwise, I don't get into other people's private business
15 Apr 2023 10:02 pm
OdeToJoy » 15 Apr 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I believe that everyone has a legal right to be with whoever makes them happy. The choices I make do not transfer to others. If a person is gay, don't join an Evangelical church. But otherwise, I don't get into other people's private business
being evangical has nothing to do with it. Jesus said a man is to marry a woman, if you don't like it don't say you are christian.
15 Apr 2023 10:09 pm
Jesus violated his own commandment by not marrying anyone, then. Typically, he should have been married by age 20 or so to a woman selected by his parents.jerrab » 15 Apr 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ being evangical has nothing to do with it. Jesus said a man is to marry a woman, if you don't like it don't say you are christian.
This was not a major issue for Jesus. You are not the authority on who can call themselvws a Christian.
15 Apr 2023 10:15 pm
he said a man is to marry a woman. and if a man is to marry it should be a woman. you are not an authority to say just because Jesus did not marry then men can marry men. that is the worst logic I ever heard.Xavier_Onassis » 15 Apr 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Jesus violated his own commandment by not marrying anyone, then. Typically, he should have been married by age 20 or so to a woman selected by his parents.
This was not a major issue for Jesus. You are not the authority on who can call themselvws a Christian.
15 Apr 2023 10:19 pm
Xavier_Onassis » 15 Apr 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Jesus violated his own commandment by not marrying anyone, then. Typically, he should have been married by age 20 or so to a woman selected by his parents.
This was not a major issue for Jesus. You are not the authority on who can call themselvws a Christian.
matthew 19
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
15 Apr 2023 10:21 pm
Xavier_Onassis » 15 Apr 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Jesus violated his own commandment by not marrying anyone, then. Typically, he should have been married by age 20 or so to a woman selected by his parents.
This was not a major issue for Jesus. You are not the authority on who can call themselvws a Christian.
if it was not major then Christ would not have said it. you have absolutely no authority to declare what was major to Jesus.
15 Apr 2023 10:23 pm
The commandment given to Adam and Eve was "be fruitful and multiply". Jesus never married and did not multiply.jerrab » 15 Apr 2023, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ he said a man is to marry a woman. and if a man is to marry it should be a woman. you are not an authority to say just because Jesus did not marry then men can marry men. that is the worst logic I ever heard.
The Jewish religion was pretty strict about the need for all people to marry.
Did I say that Jesus said men could marry men? No, I did not.
Jesus did say that everyone should love one another.
Again. no one appointed you to tell who could call themselves a Christian.
15 Apr 2023 10:24 pm
they have destroyed the democrat party and they used the falsehood that Jesus was for gay marriage.Sumela » 15 Apr 2023, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Good try Groomer, Im not MAGA. Both sides in WASH DC are clowns. You are R v D paradigm clown. a CUCK.
WASH DC's empire is crumbling. The world is de-dollarizing and the empire is in PURE PANIC MODE.
Fun times to live in!!!
Who is online
In total there are 3945 users online :: 16 registered, 17 bots, and 3912 guests
Registered users: *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: LCC, okhttp, NING, SiteLockSpider, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, DuckDuckGo, proximic, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Bolt, ADmantX, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot