You are not a woman and you therefore are unaffected by unwanted pregnancies.Vegas » 18 Apr 2023, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Until someone can show me the law that forces women to get pregnant in the first place, abortion should be banned. Period. I mean seriously. Do people seriously not know how babies are made?
Xavier_Onassis » 18 Apr 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ You are not a woman and you therefore are unaffected by unwanted pregnancies.
If every sex act resulted in a pregnancy, then you might make some sense, but MOST sex acts do not result in a pregnancy.
What if every time you wanked off, you go pregnant?
Women have a right to do with their bodies as they choose. here is zero reason why some twit like you or any government should have a goddamned thing to say about it.
...the louder the republic#nts getVegas » 18 Apr 2023, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ It doesn't matter. Unwanted pregnancies are not the same as forced pregnancies. Wear some **** protection. I am tired of this whole 'no personal responsibility' ****. How the hell can they be surprised at a pregnancy after having sex? Who can be that stupid?
the lower they sink at the polls...
peepee » 18 Apr 2023, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ ...the louder the republic#nts getthe lower they sink at the polls...
![]()
[p.s. ...abortion prohibitionist republic#nts are always loudest after an election...but as the next election approaches most will stfu or soften their stance about abortion...or get killed at the polls....wordle...]
#lamedullardrepublic#nt[andmonetaryignoramus]Vegas » 18 Apr 2023, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ Lefty. Monetary ignoramus. Doesn't know where money comes from or how it gets its' value. Typical Dimocrat. ^^^
Skans » 18 Apr 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Or, just pass a Federal Law that allows women access to abortions up to a minimum of 10 weeks. Roe v. Wade was bad law. It needed to be overturned because it was a judicial intrusion into what must be a legislative solution. No court has ruled that abortion cannot be part of a federal law.
Xavier_Onassis » 18 Apr 2023, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ Roe vs Wade was a Supreme Court Decision, not a law.
Congress has always been too gutless to pass a national law about abortion.
The main group historically opposing abortion has been the Roman Catholic Church, which is very powerful in some regions and not powerful at all in others. Recently the Fundamentalists joined the Forced Birther movement, and of course, the birth rate has declined to the point that the population of this country will decline without immigration, and so those opposing immigration seem to believe that if only they could FORCE White women to bear more children, this would cause the population to increase.
American capitalism is based on constant growth. American companies are never satisfied with selling stuff, they are compelled to sell MORE stuff. And for that to happen, there needs to be population growth.
A lot of the rightwingers believe that there is a Jewish Plot to cause the White majority to decrease in size, which is happening, and they want to stop it by forcing women to bear more children, even as the real wages of all but the most wealthy are remaining constant or declining, despite huge increases in productivity.
Hence the chant, "Jews will not replace us!" And blaming it all on George Soros, who has never been a practicing Jew.
The stupid abortion law passed by the Fascist DeSantis cannot affect me in any way.Taipan » 18 Apr 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Sir,
You will live under Florida law.
Or it's "hit the road, Jack.....& don't come back".
"Just hop on the bus, Gus".
"Make a new plan, Stan".
Simon & Garfunkel.
Xavier_Onassis » 18 Apr 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ The stupid abortion law passed by the Fascist DeSantis cannot affect me in any way.
I will vote against him and his stupid plans for as long as I can.
I have no respect for a woman who is carrying a baby and THEN decides to get rid of it at 6 months. Cut off date- early on. simple.Taipan » 18 Apr 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ I don't understand why both sides cannot debate cut-off dates.
And why can't each state decide its own future??
There is no reason Congress should pass a law based on your lack of respect.sootedupCyndi » 18 Apr 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I have no respect for a woman who is carrying a baby and THEN decides to get rid of it at 6 months. Cut off date- early on. simple.
if there's a serious health issue for the woman- or a deformed baby- That should be simple enough. doctor verifies it.
Exactly.sootedupCyndi » 18 Apr 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I have no respect for a woman who is carrying a baby and THEN decides to get rid of it at 6 months. Cut off date- early on. simple.
if there's a serious health issue for the woman- or a deformed baby- That should be simple enough. doctor verifies it.
Not so- we have Maineman.
LOL...........
sunburn » 18 Apr 2023, 3:46 am » wrote: ↑ yep. I sure wished the stupid Republicans could just take a win, per se, and don't lose their frigging mind when it comes to abortion.
They fit the proverbial give em an inch and they want a mile.
Most everyone I know doesn't mind abortion...with limitations; like NOT up to birthing time and rape, incest, and medical reasons within decent confines. One time I agree with the Demonrats.....Republicans are going completely OVERBOARD.
