OK, wise man.razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that so?
GOP Fascist Party has been calling SSI an entitlement for decades. They have been wrong for decades. I have disagreed with them for decades.
Preferential tax cuts for the wealthy is the entitlement .............. BIG TIME.
A. NO Republican is trying to ELIMINATE Social Security or MEDICARE, *******!! So you point there is MOOT as it comes.You've been ASKED to provide PROOF and you just RUN LIKE A ****** from the question!!razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You conservatives have nothing to contribute so all you become assassinators of sorts BECAUSE you know I'm right about SSI and Medicare damn right.
Yes it would be beyond reality stupid for anyone to pursue killing SSI and Medicare and screwing with Women's Right to Choose knowing full well millions of republicans will NOT vote republican anymore.
Simple as that ................. yes all of you that attempt character assassination are no good at it. Dump it in the trash can.
Millions upon millions upon millions upon millions of republicans LOVE their social security insurance and medicare and Women's Right To Choose.
I remember a case of a farming family doing just what you propose. Not only that, they took to the airwaves and started telling others to do it. The FBI showed up and shot them to death. The Feds lost a couple of officers too.
You're an idiot.razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Tell Kevin to back off = he will be history next voting cycle
you back into cock all the timerazoo » 18 Apr 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Tell Kevin to back off = he will be history next voting cycle
Liar.razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ During the 20th century, there were several periods lasting more than ten years when the return on stocks was negative.
After the Dow Jones stock index went down by over 75% between 1929 and 1933, the Dow did not return to its 1929 level until 1953 = 24 years.
In claiming that the rate of return on a stock investment is guaranteed to be greater than the return on any other asset, is lying. If an investment-firm broker made this claim to his clients, he would be arrested and charged with stock fraud.
Michael Milken went to jail for several years for making just this type of promise about financial investments.
PRIVATIZATION PROFITEERS ARE THE PONZI SCHEME = no one know what will be left for SSI........

Why are liberals always looking for new ways to tax Americans?razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, but Congress is not even discussing one key idea— a “speculation reduction tax.”
you had too much sperm dumped in your trash can that is why you have aids
Now that you got your ARSE kicked up around your NECK, you want to deflect to murdering BABIES?? What's so funny about your SS and Medicare **** is that you nasty filth have been saying the same crap for 43+ years and NO ONE on the REPUBLICAN SIDE has done anything OTHER than nothing!!razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Now that the truth is out you are defending the Fascist liars and criminals ........... paranoia will destroy ya
Fake Republicans have been lying to the nation going on 43 years.
NO NO NO we need ONE policy regarding Women's Right To Choose at the federal level ................Right to Choose leaves the choice right where it needs to be = to the Mother. Either yay or nay .......
Wait!!!razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Science did not say that but facts say this:
George H.W. Bush, 1989-93At the Republican National Convention in 1988, George H.W. Bush emphatically stated “Read my lips: no new taxes.” The words would come back to haunt him. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 raised the top tax rate from Ronald Reagan’s 28% up to 31%
razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Tell Kevin to back off = he will be history next voting cycle
I spent 45 years of my life trying to build a nest egg where I wouldn't need social security at all.razoo » 18 Apr 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Tell Kevin to back off = he will be history next voting cycle
Then stop governing by defective policies rule of law obligates every ancestor added to obey cradle to grave or else. Evolving works one way, reality divides that one way into groups believing anything else is possible.
Gee, that's funny, seeing how the BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the Social Security and Medicare TRUST FUNDS are ALL saying that by 2034, the FUNDS WILL BE DEPLETED!! AND THAT INVOLVES DOING NOTHING which is PRECISELY what you and your NAZI ILK are demanding happen- do NOTHING!!razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ Millions of republicans refusing to support republican initiatives could sink the GOP name into oblivion ....... we know this ......which would be good for the nation BECAUSE ALEC and MAGA would no longer have a home.
We do not want history to repeat itself:
SSI trust fund does just contain IOUs, but they’re not worthless. If they are, someone should tell that to the very smart and very rich people, and the central banks of Japan, China, and many other countries that hold a large share of their assets in U.S. government bonds.
When the trust fund was created in 1935, the law stipulated that any excess revenues coming into the Social Security system must be used to purchase federal government bonds. (At the time, the stock market had just lost over 75% of its value and was understood to be unsafe.)
Federal bonds are absolutely safe; the government of the United States has never defaulted on any bond obligation.
Former President Bush appeared to be ready to break this tradition. He appeared to want the Treasury to “selectively default” on the bonds in the Social Security trust fund.
He obviously felt the United States doesn’t have to meet its obligation to the working people of America the way it meets its obligations to ultra-wealthy bondholders.
His suggestion that the U.S. government might not be willing to repay its debt obligations was remarkable and for a time completely disrupted global financial markets. YES THE EARTH SHOOK VIOLENTLY.
HEY KEVIN MCCARTHY GIVE IT UP = TELL ALEC NO MORE NONSENSE!!!!!!!!!!!
You are a effing IDIOT....razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ What the trustees are saying is SSI is NOT going broke .................. you are out of touch spreading misinformation.
GIVE IT UP ..............
Now you can take you a big ol dose of STFU, LOSER!!! I posted FACTS and here are even MORE FACTS!! What I SAID is that the TRUST FUND is going BROKE, which it is from the TRUSTEES REPORT ABOVE!!! YOU LIE, not me.• The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be able to pay 100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033, one year earlier than reported last year. At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing program income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of scheduled benefits
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TRSUM/index.html
Trustees vs trusting souls that believe anything is possible except now is eternity eternally separating reproducted results forward one at a time here in plain sight.razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ What the trustees are saying is SSI is NOT going broke .................. you are out of touch spreading misinformation.
GIVE IT UP ..............
Psssst. DICKBREATH, you have a PROPAGANDA PIECE, I posted the ACTUAL REPORT and they DO NOT AGREE!!razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 31, 2023
Contact: Linda Benesch, lbenesch@socialsecurityworks.org
The 2023 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds, released today, shows that our Social Security system remains strong and fully affordable.This year’s report announces that Social Security has an accumulated surplus of approximately $2.8 trillion.
It projects that, even if Congress took no action whatsoever, Social Security can pay all benefits and associated administrative costs until 2034. It is 89 percent funded for the next quarter century, 83 percent for the next half century, and 80 percent for the next three quarters of a century.
At the end of the century, in 2100, Social Security is projected to cost around 6 percent of gross domestic product (“GDP”). That end-of-the-century cost is a substantially smaller percentage than most other wealthy countries spend on their counterpart programs today.Social Security Works has released a fact sheet that puts the report into further context, including the context of the ongoing fight over raising the debt ceiling.
The following is a statement on the report from Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works:
“The takeaway from this report is that whether to expand or cut Social Security’s modest but vital benefits is a question of values, not affordability.
Congressional Democrats have proposed several plans that expand benefits. These plans are fully paid for by requiring millionaires and billionaires to contribute their fair share.
These proposals are bipartisan in the way that matters — they have strong support from Democratic, Republican, and independent voters. In contrast, 88 percent of voters oppose cutting benefits.
Unfortunately, Republican politicians are not listening to their voters.
The most recent budget of the Republican Study Committee, which consists of about three quarters of the House Republicans, includes deep cuts to both Social Security and Medicare. Other Republicans are trying to create fast-track commissions that operate behind closed doors, aimed at forcing cuts that would not be supported in the sunshine.
To see the results of cutting earned retirement benefits through an undemocratic process, one only needs to look across the Atlantic Ocean, where the French people are rising up in anger.
This is hilarious, Your thinktank didn't exist until 2017. Most likely headed up by some nonprofit group like Clinton Global Initiative.razoo » 19 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 31, 2023
Contact: Linda Benesch, lbenesch@socialsecurityworks.org
It's headed up by a bunch of LWNJ NAZI SOCIALIST/COMMUNISTS. Same ideology, different names.Nostradamus'omh » 19 Apr 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ This is hilarious, Your thinktank didn't exist until 2017. Most likely headed up by some nonprofit group like Clinton Global Initiative.