says more about you than it does meCannonpointer » 29 Apr 2023, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ It worked.
Children being disturbed by gender dysphoric men dressed as hypersexualized women on the public dime is a non-issue to you. Evil prospers when good men do nothing - not that this applies to you,as you are neither good, nor a man. What you are is a child groomer and sexual predator by proxy. Here's your sign.
If a woman were raped and I called it a non-issue, you would take moral umbrage.Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ the poll was nothing but a trap
i said they are non issues because of the primise of the poll was bogus
i dont and never have "defended" any of it
No, it's under your avatar, not mine.
Dear sir. I have found MrKelly to be a fairly honest broker here.
I said it was non issues because it was a bogus pollCannonpointer » 29 Apr 2023, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ If a woman were raped and I called it a non-issue, you would take moral umbrage.
Ditto, mother ****.
Would you mind posting MrKelly's posts in which he defendsCannonpointer » 29 Apr 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it's under your avatar, not mine.
Life is like a box of chocolates, skeeter. You never know when you're going to get
caught.
like I saidCannonpointer » 29 Apr 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it's under your avatar, not mine.
Life is like a box of chocolates, skeeter. You never know when you're going to get
caught.
You think the concern over the grooming of childrenMrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I said it was non issues because it was a bogus poll
Fake manufactured outrage
thanksSumela » 29 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Would you mind posting MrKelly's posts in which he defends
child grooming
kid cutting
child rape
no, the idea that all of the left are “defending” any of that **** isSumela » 29 Apr 2023, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You think the concern over the grooming of children
and the continual lowering of legal standards to mutilate childrens genitalia....is manufactured outrage.?
Okay, thats a fair statement.Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ no, the idea that all of the left are “defending” any of that **** is
LOL. This is a chat site. I have no friends here.Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ thanks
but leave it alone
you are going to be around longer than I am
and you don’t need the drama
yesSumela » 29 Apr 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, thats a fair statement.
So itd be like saying all cons are Bush/Cheney child murdering psychopaths?
Only if you are an Immoral **** ****.
Thats true. I will give Trump a plus for starting no news wars.Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ yes
but I think it would be a fair statement to say that most presidents are
I made a claim. I said that if a woman were raped and I called it a non-issue, you would take umbrage.Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I said it was non issues because it was a bogus poll
Fake manufactured outrage
noCannonpointer » 29 Apr 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I made a claim. I said that if a woman were raped and I called it a non-issue, you would take umbrage.
Did I speak false?
Link?Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑ no
when i posted a video of a congressman (2 or 3 times) and he was defending in a house meeting .. (and voted for) 12 year olds to marry if they had their parents consent
one member said he would be hero to some leftys on here, one said " if its a republican, he didnt want to watch"
no one condemned him
maybe go put a label on them too
Yes yes - it's defending ITSELF!Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ no, the idea that all of the left are “defending” any of that **** is
My dear respected brother....he posted the video. I watched it.