Absolutely not. I think as I navigate space mutually evolving forward proportionately alive now. You refuse and mind what people by consensus believe possible never agreeing on the kinetic balancing of reproductions left evolving forward now.Deezer Shoove » 25 Apr 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Stick to sound bites, ya **** weirdo.
You are B.See: Many posts, nothing to say.
Nostradamus'omh » 25 Apr 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ I mind what people by consensus believe possible by agreeing to legitimize the 'lesser-evil' Republic#nt puppet$ every $election...
FIFY - edited for clarity.peepee » 25 Apr 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑I am another Democrat-Doper. This is why my brain is broken, I ramble, bamble and scramble letters and symbols thinking they are words. Thank you Skans for assisting a poor, old, scrambled-retardl like me out and explaining why I am the way I am to the rest of the world.
I told you before to post like an adult or **** off.Nostradamus'omh » 25 Apr 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ Absolutely not. I think as I navigate space mutually evolving forward proportionately alive now. You refuse and mind what people by consensus believe possible never agreeing on the kinetic balancing of reproductions left evolving forward now.
Look at society's child cradle to grave telling me to act like an ancestral adult that knows their place in the natural order. You won't explain evolving in plain sight always reverting to one reality or another.Deezer Shoove » 25 Apr 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ I told you before to post like an adult or **** off.
People are a product of conditioning and you're too stupid or arrogant to know this.
A carpenter sees all problems as a nail because his tool is a hammer.
An endocrinologist sees all health issues as fluids and glands.
A religious zealot . . . Well, you get the idea.
You are immersed in your own chemical bath. So overwhelmed by the stimuli you get in this biological soup of endocrinology and environment, you drown and give in to it. You have to believe everyone is in the same environment or go crazy. But...
Most people realize their sense of reality may differ from the next person. You do not.
Try to take a breath once in a while. . . or **** off.
Pot, the biggest non-issue in the history of the United States. You potheads keep crying about this. It's so **** annoying. There are only 4 states that have it illegal. This is a state's issue.nuckinfutz » 22 Apr 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ The Professor is right!![]()
https://youtu.be/sRwUVovtdr0[b] [/b]
RayJJohnson » 25 Apr 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Pot, the biggest non-issue in the history of the United States. You potheads keep crying about this. It's so **** annoying.
@ssholes who have foisted your stooooooooopid f@ck laws criminalizing pot, etc. ...get real, dummy!.. 
PLEASE MR BIG GOVERNMENT
PLEASE THROW THEM IN JAIL
BECAUSE I HATE DRUGS!!
Bathe in that ****, buddy.Nostradamus'omh » 25 Apr 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Look at society's child cradle to grave telling me to act like an ancestral adult that knows their place in the natural order. You won't explain evolving in plain sight always reverting to one reality or another.
I am not a big government type you goof. I am 100% for removing pot prohibition laws at the federal level. I am all for the states deciding this issue.peepee » 25 Apr 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...you big government prohibitionists are the whiny@ssholes who have foisted your stooooooooopid f@ck laws criminalizing pot, etc. ...get real, dummy!..
PLEASE MR BIG GOVERNMENT
PLEASE THROW THEM IN JAIL
BECAUSE I HATE DRUGS!!
![]()
#prohibitionist@ssholes
...again dumb@ss 'legalize' is slave-mentality term used by brain-laundered authoritardians... intelligent people don't want 'legalization'... they want REPEAL OF YOUR GD FOOL LAWS and all that entail$...dumb@ss...RayJJohnson » 25 Apr 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a big government type you goof. I am 100% for removing pot prohibition laws at the federal level. I am all for the states deciding this issue.
I also am stating the obvious, making pot legal has lead to the left pushing for harder drugs to be legalized. That is just a fact and now look at the streets of blue cities. They are littered with drug addicts who are on hard drugs that are at the very least decriminalized. Nice job!![]()
I do hate drugs and I hate what they do to people.
RayJJohnson » 25 Apr 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a big government type you goof. I am 100% for removing pot prohibition laws at the federal level. I am all for the states deciding this issue.
I also am stating the obvious, making pot legal has lead to the left pushing for harder drugs to be legalized. That is just a fact and now look at the streets of blue cities. They are littered with drug addicts who are on hard drugs that are at the very least decriminalized. Nice job!![]()
I do hate drugs and I hate what they do to people.
What do you think I just said you? Your pot-addled brain can't understand a damn thing.peepee » 25 Apr 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ ...again dumb@ss 'legalize' is slave-mentality term used by brain-laundered authoritardians... intelligent people don't want 'legalization'... they want REPEAL OF YOUR GD FOOL LAWS and all that entail$...dumb@ss...![]()
...please familiarize yourself with alcohol prohibition, you big-government-sucking authoritardian... [and monetary ignoramus]
I voted to legalize pot in my state of Washington.peepee » 25 Apr 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
[i'd bet big this ^^^ big-government republic#nt prohibitionist would vote against pot 'legalization' [retard term] in his state... amirite?...]
RayJJohnson » 25 Apr 2023, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ I said I want federal drug law repealed because drugs are a state issue. Unlike you, I know something about the constitution.
i will remind you of your support for $hit-puppet republic#nt federal drug warriors, authoritardian fool... [and monetary ignoramus]

So what happened? NOTHING! You provide no evidence at all!RayJJohnson » 25 Apr 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Pot, the biggest non-issue in the history of the United States. You potheads keep crying about this. It's so **** annoying. There are only 4 states that have it illegal. This is a state's issue.
We said that if you legalize pot, the left will want to legalize more drugs and that is what is happening in so many blue states. Now we have a drug epidemic in blue states. Nice job on letting happen EXACTLY what we said would happen.
Uh, I don't do drugs! But it is a matter of personal freedom to do so, I believe.
I already said what happened. Go look at all the states and cities that started with legalizing pot that now are decriminalizing hard drugs. Their cities are littered with drug addicts. Look at Seattle, Portland, San Fran, LA, Chicago and the list goes on. You do have states that legalized pot but do not have harder drug problems and that is because those states have not followed the trend to decriminalize harder drugs and those states and cities happen to be run by Republicans.nuckinfutz » 25 Apr 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ So what happened? NOTHING! You provide no evidence at all!![]()
@Ray J Johnson
Holy **** you are stupid.peepee » 25 Apr 2023, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...unlike you, i understand self-medication, ingestion, plant-growing, etc., are INDIVIDUAL issues... as to your knowledge of the con.i will remind you of your support for $hit-puppet republic#nt federal drug warriors, authoritardian fool... [and monetary ignoramus]
![]()
...[ray j, the drug war karen]
not bathing in any **** here, I understand the natural state of living in a body being eternally separated by each breathe I take, each heartbeat added until both cease to occur again.Deezer Shoove » 25 Apr 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Bathe in that ****, buddy.
"Explain evolving in plain sight" is your really stupid mantra.
How about YOU give it a go? I don't speak stupid as well as you.
About the only reason to post you back and forth in this thread is because the thread itself is dumb as ****.
So, minus the ridiculous baby talk, what the hell is evolving in plain sight?
Why is that your mantra?
A weak response will be you babbling.
A decent response will be you actually trying to convey an idea.
Have at it, genius.