Liberal Forum

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 1:37 pm

Not one bit of proof that any ballot that was counted was NOT cast by a legitimate registered voter.  NOT ONE BIT.

****!!! You are a goddamn liar!!!

Based on current population data from the Census Bureau and voting data from previous elections, Just Facts has conducted a study to estimate the number of votes illegally cast by non-citizens in the battleground states of the 2020 election. The results—documented in this spreadsheet—show that such fraudulent activities have netted Joe Biden the following extra votes in these tightly contested states:

• Arizona: 51,081 ± 17,689
• Georgia: 54,950 ± 19,025
• Michigan: 22,585 ± 7,842
• Nevada: 22,021 ± 7,717
• North Carolina: 46,218 ± 16,001
• Pennsylvania: 32,706 ± 11,332
• Wisconsin: 5,010 ± 1,774

If the lower end of these illegal vote estimates were removed from the vote tallies as of November 8, 2020, 2:00 AM EST, Donald Trump would be leading in states that have a total of 259 electoral votes, or 11 shy of the 270 needed to win the presidency. If the upper end of the illegal vote estimates were removed, Trump would be leading in states that have 285 electoral votes, or 15 more than needed to win the presidency.

 These estimates account for just one type of election fraud, and they tend to understate it because they depend on Census surveys, which are known to undercount non-citizens.

Just Facts asked a Ph.D. scholar who specializes in data analytics to critically review this study, and he assessed it as follows:

“Instead of adding politics, vitriol, and bias to this timely, heated topic, this study provides a credible data analysis that supports a strong hypothesis of non-citizens having a significant effect on this election. Any serious critic should try improving on these estimates, as opposed to dismissing them with unproven claims.”

– Dr. Andrew Glen, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Operations Research, The United States Military Academy, and Award-Winning Researcher in the Field of Computational Probability

https://heartland.org/opinion/quantifyi ... -election/
 
 

Buffalo » 24 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm

****!!! You are a goddamn liar!!!

Based on current population data from the Census Bureau and voting data from previous elections, Just Facts has conducted a study to estimate the number of votes illegally cast by non-citizens in the battleground states of the 2020 election. The results—documented in this spreadsheet—show that such fraudulent activities have netted Joe Biden the following extra votes in these tightly contested states:

• Arizona: 51,081 ± 17,689
• Georgia: 54,950 ± 19,025
• Michigan: 22,585 ± 7,842
• Nevada: 22,021 ± 7,717
• North Carolina: 46,218 ± 16,001
• Pennsylvania: 32,706 ± 11,332
• Wisconsin: 5,010 ± 1,774

If the lower end of these illegal vote estimates were removed from the vote tallies as of November 8, 2020, 2:00 AM EST, Donald Trump would be leading in states that have a total of 259 electoral votes, or 11 shy of the 270 needed to win the presidency. If the upper end of the illegal vote estimates were removed, Trump would be leading in states that have 285 electoral votes, or 15 more than needed to win the presidency.

 These estimates account for just one type of election fraud, and they tend to understate it because they depend on Census surveys, which are known to undercount non-citizens.

Just Facts asked a Ph.D. scholar who specializes in data analytics to critically review this study, and he assessed it as follows:

“Instead of adding politics, vitriol, and bias to this timely, heated topic, this study provides a credible data analysis that supports a strong hypothesis of non-citizens having a significant effect on this election. Any serious critic should try improving on these estimates, as opposed to dismissing them with unproven claims.”

– Dr. Andrew Glen, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Operations Research, The United States Military Academy, and Award-Winning Researcher in the Field of Computational Probability

https://heartland.org/opinion/quantifyi ... -election/

here's a news flash:  "a study to estimate" something is not PROOF of anything.

you are as dumb as a box of rocks.  Are you pals with Sidney Powell?

         

Nostradamus'omh » 24 Apr 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 2:33 pm

Any thoughts where he shows up next? maybe join Glenn Beck's network or go straight social media on Elon Musk's new network not released yet.

My guess is some sort of podcast with guests like Joe Rogan.
He is worth 400 million so I doubt he chases money.
Just a guess at this time.
 

FJB » 24 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm

Who controls the House now cocksucker?

Certainly not McCarthy.  

Sumela » 24 Apr 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 2:54 pm

My guess is some sort of podcast with guests like Joe Rogan.
He is worth 400 million so I doubt he chases money.
Just a guess at this time.
 

Worth is a belief believed by everyone for or against him personally. Really doesn't matter which reality all parties are from, humanity protects deniers until extinction and eliminates honesty anytime someone can debunk all realities combined With a common since conceived understanding of evolving working each lifetime present regardless which generation occupying space here they evolved in or as currently alive.

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 1:21 pm

as an example... the bolded sentence is absolutely complete fiction without ANY evidentiary basis in fact.  NONE.

Wrong. You are a bot.

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

https://paelectioninvestigation.com/

https://electionfraud20.org/

Zeets2 » 24 Apr 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 11:19 am

Love to see Bill O'Reilly return to his old slot.

If not him, I think Laura Ingraham would be a terrific replacement, leaving her 10pm slot to take the more lucrative 8pm spot.

I would be good with that too (bill)

I loved all the shows that he and Jon Stewart did

and to think that could happen again, especially now, is a good thought 

https://youtu.be/G7fIjufCPsg
 
 

FredH » 24 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm

Wrong. You are a bot.

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

https://paelectioninvestigation.com/

https://electionfraud20.org/

those Kool-Aid factories must be working overtime cranking out that baseless ****!  

FJB » 24 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm

Who controls the House now cocksucker?

does Kevin control it by rubbing it?      

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:05 pm

those Kool-Aid factories must be working overtime cranking out that baseless ****!

If state investigations are Kool-Aid to you then TDS has destroyed your brain. There is a nut house somewhere with a straight jacket chained to a wall just for you.

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 2:15 pm

memes don't contradict facts.  Face it... it was clearly an anomalous election.... unlike any we'd ever had... and it coincided with the reelection bid of the most divisive and atypical republican candidate that we'd ever had.  The only other time the GOP had nominated a candidate for president without experience in eleted office was Ike,  And he was a beloved national hero.  Trump was a self aggrandizing TV huckster.  Layer on that a pandemic....  To expect the electorate to "behave normally" in that situation is ridiculous.

Ha Ha Ha you are truly an idiot!

Tempest62 » 24 Apr 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 2:03 pm

Here’s what Kari Lake posted on Truth Social:

“The best decision I ever made was leaving Fox. Good for you, @TuckerCarlson. You're
free & uncensored!”

At this point, Kari Lake is
my # 1 choice for V.P. in '24.

Zeets2 » 24 Apr 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 11:19 am

Love to see Bill O'Reilly return to his old slot.

If not him, I think Laura Ingraham would be a terrific replacement, leaving her 10pm slot to take the more lucrative 8pm spot.

I too, would O'Reilly back.
Gretchen Carlson & Megyn Kelly, too.
Let 'by-gones be by-gones'.
The past is the past.........Let's strive toward a bright future.
It is not necessary to agree 100% time.        Jeeese !!!                                   

Sumela » 24 Apr 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 1:38 pm

LOL.  

What is reason w/ Tucker ?

FredH » 24 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm

Ha Ha Ha you are truly an idiot!

You reallly are at your best when you deliver those fact-filled arguments of yours like that!

SO convincing!!!

 

maineman » 24 Apr 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:06 pm

does Kevin control it by rubbing it?    

How often does the skank go to the House?

Sumela » 24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am

      That poor broken alkie soul

LOL........
Me ??
Are you talkin to me ???
Well, I am the only one here".
                                                                   Travis Bickle,
                                                                   Taxi Driver.                                             
@nuckin futz  
https://youtu.be/-QWL-FwX4t4
 

FJB » 24 Apr 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:27 pm

How often does the skank go to the House?

I don't have a clue what you are talking about.   I don't know of any skanks around these parts.  Tobacco Road has a few, as I can recall

Sumela » 24 Apr 2023, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 10:58 am

Now Fox ratings will be like CNN and MSBNC.  
Tucker is better than the Neocon *** at Fox anyway.
Now we will have fully homogenous *** "STATE NEWS" news - supporting war everywhere.
Tucker will be just fine....great work over the years Mr. Carlson...respect

I'm hoping Tucker pairs up with James O'Keefe and forms a new, even harder-hitting, investigative journalism team.
 

Skans » 24 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm

I'm hoping Tucker pairs up with James O'Keefe and forms a new, even harder-hitting, investigative journalism team.
 

Won't change how humanity corrupts each great great grandchild changing population forward now.