Step outside your intellectual reality where your mind belongs to patent pending owners of intellectual beliefs people have to pay to stay into a collective soul mentality.
No. I hate Biden and everything his administration stands for. But, for you to claim that I in any way want to support Biden simply because I expect a lot more from Trump than what he previously gave us is the kind of thinking that will not move us to prevail over Democrats this next election cycle.
So in OTHER WORDS, the STATES now have their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to legislate on murdering babies and you want to bloviate on something that LEGALLY even your gal Ginsburg said stood on SHAKY GROUND to begin with??ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, So Trump nominated 3 judges who subsequently overturned Roe V Wade. This triggered a wave of laws that restricted abortions for women AND children. Adminstrators were emboldened enough to talk about tracking teenage girls menustral cycle. At least 3 cases occured with 3 children who had to go out of state to get an abortion.

I agree with your assessment .....Skans » 26 Apr 2023, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ No. I hate Biden and everything his administration stands for. But, for you to claim that I in any way want to support Biden simply because I expect a lot more from Trump than what he previously gave us is the kind of thinking that will not move us to prevail over Democrats this next election cycle.
The truth is, for all of Trump's rhetoric about how he's the "best", he didn't perform like the best. Trump succeeded in getting elected, and he accomplished some good things as President, but failed in his attempt to 1) form a core group of loyal and effective staff in his administration to infiltrate and re-define the deep-state; 2) failed to stay in control of congress and 3) failed to win a second term.
Are you the kind of person who is just going to give Trump a pass on this **** performance?
Look at you protecting speculation genetics cannot eternally separate the active reproductions occupying space now. Everything you defend is context controls content never exceeding evolving forward now and demand everyone obey relative time logistics as undeniable facts of life when only created by theorizing life exceeds being here now under theologies/philosophies there is more than perpetual balancing taking place here.Beekeeper » 26 Apr 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ So in OTHER WORDS, the STATES now have their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to legislate on murdering babies and you want to bloviate on something that LEGALLY even your gal Ginsburg said stood on SHAKY GROUND to begin with??
Seems you REALLY DON'T LIKE DEMOCRACY in action at all!! And having a SMALLER GOVERNMENTAL LEGISLATURE PASS LAWS IS MORE IN LINE WITH THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE IN THAT MORE COMPACT GROUP OF PEOPLE, which is HOW FEDERALISM WORKS, MORON!!
And DEBUNKING YOUR "Administrators" and menstrual cycles is **** TOO!!
FILE - Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis gestures during a news conference, Jan. 26, 2023, in Miami.
On Friday, Feb. 3, 2023, The Associated Press reported on false claims circulating on social media that DeSantis is requiring all female student-athletes in Florida to provide detailed information about their menstrual cycles in order to compete in organized sports. (AP Photo/Marta Lavandier, File)
CLAIM: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is requiring all female student-athletes in the state to provide detailed information about their periods in order to compete in organized sports.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The Florida High School Athletic Association is weighing the recommendation from an advisory committee, but no final decision has been made. DeSantis’ education commissioner is a member of the association’s board of directors and the commissioner also appoints three others, but the association is a private nonprofit organization, not a state agency under the purview of the governor’s office.
That is not a viable excuse for someone who wants to be President of the United States. Trump did have access to just about anyone he wanted to choose to put the right teams together to attack the swamp, move his agenda forward and keep control of Congress. He lost focus and embroiled himself in stupid twitter battles and a huge battle with the media. He failed to ever switch up his game from simply going on the attack against his adversaries. In doing this he revealed, to me at least, some genuine faults and flaws in his ability to lead a nation.Majik » 26 Apr 2023, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ I agree with your assessment .....
but let's be honest here .....
Trump was a rookie politician that had no clue how devious and underhanded DC and the swamp actually is ....
What makes you think this?But Trump definitely knows now ...
I tend to agree with this, but I still want to see a lot more strategy and depth from Trump than what I am presently seeing.and at this point there is no Republican that can beat him .....not even DeSantis. ...
Skans » 26 Apr 2023, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ No. I hate Biden and everything his administration stands for. But, for you to claim that I in any way want to support Biden simply because I expect a lot more from Trump than what he previously gave us is the kind of thinking that will not move us to prevail over Democrats this next election cycle.
The truth is, for all of Trump's rhetoric about how he's the "best", he didn't perform like the best. Trump succeeded in getting elected, and he accomplished some good things as President, but failed in his attempt to 1) form a core group of loyal and effective staff in his administration to infiltrate and re-define the deep-state; 2) failed to stay in control of congress and 3) failed to win a second term.
Are you the kind of person who is just going to give Trump a pass on this **** performance?
IMBECILE!MR-7 » 26 Apr 2023, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ I searched for this on google....bing....and others.....
"Trump sent us into chaos over overturning a ruling that provided women with SAFE abortion options." America’s chaotic new reality over abortion takes shapehttps://www.cnn.com/2022/06/27/politics ... s...WebThe Supreme Court’s landmark decision on Friday to overturn the near 50-year constitutional right for a woman to end a pregnancy is triggering aftershocks that have already begun to …
This decision was made under joey.....
I have never made that claim. I am not Will Franklin. I love it when you make that claim because It totally invalidates everything you say.
Look at you, one talking point statistical error eliminates the whole results of evolving accomplished in plain sight so far. Realities are such tyrants by those defending them.ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ I have never made that claim. I am not Will Franklin. I love it when you make that claim because It totally invalidates everything you say. :D
Did I say that they were going to monitor their cycles? No. I said they "Talked about it." lBeekeeper » 26 Apr 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ So in OTHER WORDS, the STATES now have their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to legislate on murdering babies and you want to bloviate on something that LEGALLY even your gal Ginsburg said stood on SHAKY GROUND to begin with??
Seems you REALLY DON'T LIKE DEMOCRACY in action at all!! And having a SMALLER GOVERNMENTAL LEGISLATURE PASS LAWS IS MORE IN LINE WITH THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE IN THAT MORE COMPACT GROUP OF PEOPLE, which is HOW FEDERALISM WORKS, MORON!!
And DEBUNKING YOUR "Administrators" and menstrual cycles is **** TOO!!
FILE - Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis gestures during a news conference, Jan. 26, 2023, in Miami.
On Friday, Feb. 3, 2023, The Associated Press reported on false claims circulating on social media that DeSantis is requiring all female student-athletes in Florida to provide detailed information about their menstrual cycles in order to compete in organized sports. (AP Photo/Marta Lavandier, File)
CLAIM: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is requiring all female student-athletes in the state to provide detailed information about their periods in order to compete in organized sports.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The Florida High School Athletic Association is weighing the recommendation from an advisory committee, but no final decision has been made. DeSantis’ education commissioner is a member of the association’s board of directors and the commissioner also appoints three others, but the association is a private nonprofit organization, not a state agency under the purview of the governor’s office.
ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ I have never made that claim. I am not Will Franklin. I love it when you make that claim because It totally invalidates everything you say.
All you do is lie, dumbduck.
Pssst. deadweight, you FAIL AGAIN since the FACTS tell a far different story. JUST for the RECORD, Florida has been asking these questions of female athletes for DECADES. So no one is "talking about adding them" as YOU CLAIMED, but the FACTS just kick your ARSE AGAIN!!ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Did I say that they were going to monitor their cycles? No. I said they "Talked about it." l
Unlike you, I tend to chose my words carefully.
The athletic association’s current Preparticipation Physical Evaluation Form, which must be completed by a student and their physician and kept on file at their school, asks female athletes five questions about their periods, but they’re all listed as optional.
The questions, which association officials say have been on the form for at least two decades,include when a student had their first menstrual period, when the most recent one was, how long the interval between their periods typically lasts, how many they’ve had in the past year and the longest interval between periods in the last year.
[...]
Robert Sefcik, a member of the sports medicine advisory committee, said making the menstrual cycle questions mandatory rather than optional is consistent with national guidelines for sports physicals developed by the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Sports Medicine and other groups.
He said having a form that has been vetted and published by national organizations provides an “extremely credible resource” for doctors conducting sports physicals.
“We appreciate the medical necessity of the questions, including menstrual history, that are included on this form and support their inclusion on the form,” Sefcik, who was the committee’s previous chairperson and voted in favor of recommendations, wrote in an email.
The national guidelines say menstrual history is an “essential discussion for female athletes” because period abnormalities could be a sign of “low energy availability, pregnancy, or other gynecologic or medical conditions.”
“Menstrual dysfunction is 2-3 times more common in athletes than nonathletes, and 10-15% of female athletes have amenorrhea (loss of menstrual cycle) or oligomenorrhea (a decrease in number of menstrual cycles per year),” the guidelines read. “Amenorrhea occurs more frequently in players of sports that emphasize leanness, such as running, gymnastics, cheerleading, dance, and figure skating.”
All you do is GROOM CHILDREN to fit your PERVERTED PEDOPHILE LIFE!!
You better get back to cuba while you can
You lied about what I said earlier. You won't admit to it. I think we're good here.Beekeeper » 26 Apr 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Pssst. deadweight, you FAIL AGAIN since the FACTS tell a far different story. JUST for the RECORD, Florida has been asking these questions of female athletes for DECADES. So no one is "talking about adding them" as YOU CLAIMED, but the FACTS just kick your ARSE AGAIN!!
What you DON'T seem to realize is that there are SERIOUS MEDICAL REASONS for asking them, but you don't seem to care since that won't fir your narrative. It has NOTHING to do with ABORTION, but MEDICALLY it applies to FEMALE STUDENT ATHLETES as OTHER medical issues can be related directly to heir cycle.
apnews /article/fact-check-desantis-florida-sports-female-athletes-160560972802
Trump did nothing to keep you little bitches from killing your children.ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ Trump sent us into chaos over overturning a ruling that provided women with SAFE abortion options. Late term abortions were rare and done to save the life of the mother.
ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, So Trump nominated 3 judges who subsequently overturned Roe V Wade. This triggered a wave of laws that restricted abortions for women AND children. Adminstrators were emboldened enough to talk about tracking teenage girls menustral cycle. At least 3 cases occured with 3 children who had to go out of state to get an abortion.
MR-7 » 25 Apr 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The 45th president, and former member of the Democratic party, said his Supreme Court overturned Roe because “I appointed over 300 judges to fill the federal bench with pro-constitution warriors who interpret the laws as written.” He claimed he faced “vile attacks to confirm our three great Supreme Court justices.”
Trump says Democrats are "executing babies after birth" in one of his wildest speeches (msn.com)