Most abortions are performed before the fetus has a fully developed central nervous system, let alone a functional cardio vascular system.RebelGator » 26 Apr 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you name one instance when a child wanted to be aborted?
Quit posting stupid ****.
there has to be more choices than trump and biden.
ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Most abortions are performed before the fetus has a fully developed central nervous system, let alone a functional cardio vascular system.
The majority of abortions are within the first term. A late term abortions happens because something has gone drastically wrong.
That's nice.....how many babies requested to be aborted like you claimed in your earlier post?ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Most abortions are performed before the fetus has a fully developed central nervous system, let alone a functional cardio vascular system.
AND SCIENCE says it's a HUMAN BEING AT CONCEPTION and MURDER is the WILLFUL TAKING OF A HUMAN LIFE!!ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Most abortions are performed before the fetus has a fully developed central nervous system, let alone a functional cardio vascular system.
And you think you're winning this debate? It's hard to complain when you don't even exist.RebelGator » 26 Apr 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ That's nice.....how many babies requested to be aborted like you claimed in your earlier post?
Science doesn't say that. You really need to work on your word choice. It's a blob with human DNA. Every time I take a ****, That too is a blob with human DNA.Beekeeper » 26 Apr 2023, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ AND SCIENCE says it's a HUMAN BEING AT CONCEPTION and MURDER is the WILLFUL TAKING OF A HUMAN LIFE!!
Either you ARE the "party of science" or you are a EFFING HYPOCRITE!! And you just keep making MORE NAZI EXCUSES TO MURDER BABIES IN THE MOTHER'S WOMB!!
Of course it is... Trump didn't overturn anything of the sort.
He nominated three people who subsequently were approved by others to render decisions having nothing to do with the president. It was Jews.ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, So Trump nominated 3 judges who subsequently overturned Roe V Wade. This triggered a wave of laws that restricted abortions for women AND children. Adminstrators were emboldened enough to talk about tracking teenage girls menustral cycle. At least 3 cases occured with 3 children who had to go out of state to get an abortion.
The pro-life movement is Christian in origin. The 3 judges are also Christian. No Jews needed.DeezerShoove » 26 Apr 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ He nominated three people who subsequently were approved by others to render decisions having nothing to do with the president. It was Jews.
ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Science doesn't say that. You really need to work on your word choice. It's a blob with human DNA. Every time I take a ****, That too is a blob with human DNA.
A. Basic human embryological factsTo begin with, scientifically something very radical occurs between the processes of gametogenesis and fertilization�the change from a simple part of one human being (i.e., a sperm) and a simple part of another human being (i.e., an oocyte�usually referred to as an "ovum" or "egg"), which simply possess "human life", to a new, genetically unique, newly existing, individual, whole living human being (a single-cell embryonic human zygote). That is, upon fertilization, parts of human beings have actually been transformed into something very different from what they were before; they have been changed into a single, whole human being. During the process of fertilization, the sperm and the oocyte cease to exist as such, and a new human being is produced.
https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html
Oh looky!! We kick you NAZI BABY MURDERING ARSE AGAIN!!!ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Science doesn't say that. You really need to work on your word choice. It's a blob with human DNA. Every time I take a ****, That too is a blob with human DNA.
So you want to STILL stand by your LIE?? AND ALSO YOUR NAZI EXCUSE to murder babies??Clear and Straightforward Science
So the biological answer to the question “When does human life begin?” is easy to answer from a scientific perspective: human life begins at the moment the sperm fertilizes the egg. This is not merely common sense and the claim of pro-life advocates, it is clear and straightforward science, as settled as heliocentrism and the existence of atoms.
https://evolutionnews.org/2022/05/if-a- ... hat-is-it/
Oh how I LOVE kicking your NAZI ARSE!!ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Science doesn't say that. You really need to work on your word choice. It's a blob with human DNA. Every time I take a ****, That too is a blob with human DNA.
So there is SCIENCE taking away EVERY SINGLE EXCUSE YOU HAVE SO YOU NAZIS CAN MURDER BABIES!!The Critical Scientific Issue
So the critical scientific issue at the heart of the question “when does human life begin” is: What scientific description of the tissue (let’s call it the “fetus” for brevity) before human life begins makes sense biologically? Consider the options:Consider the scientific implications of each option:
- The fetus is a part of the mother’s body.
- The fetus is not part of the mother’s body, but is an individual of another species.
- The fetus is not any kind of living thing — it’s just a clump of biological molecules undergoing chemical reactions.
1) The fetus is a part of the mother’s body. If the fetus is a part of the mother’s body, then all pregnant women are chromosomal mosaics. That is, they are organisms that have two sets of genomes. Chromosome mosaicism is a rare disorder and is not synonymous with pregnancy. There is no such thing as “transient chromosomal mosaicism.” Furthermore, if the fetus is a part of the mother’s body, then half of pregnant women are hermaphrodites — i.e., they contain both male and female tissues. Needless to say, “transient gestational hermaphroditism” is not a recognized medical disorder. Furthermore, if a new human life begins by a piece of the mother’s body becoming a new organism, then human beings reproduce by budding. Budding is a form of asexual reproduction used by some species of worms, sponges, corals, and microorganisms, but it is not a means of human reproduction. There is no biological sense to be made of the claim that “the fetus is part of the mother’s body.” The claim leads to scientific implications that are nonsense.
2) The fetus is not part of the mother’s body but is an individual of another species. If the fetus is an individual member of another species, then pregnancy is by far the most common parasitic disease among humans. What’s more, the transition in each pregnancy from a non-human parasite to a new human being is speciation — the evolution of a new species, “Homo fetus” to Homo sapiens — occurring with each pregnancy. This is, of course, scientific nonsense.
3) The fetus is not any kind of living thing — it’s just a clump of biological molecules undergoing chemical reactions. If the fetus is not really living at all, then each pregnancy is a new origin-of-life event. This is also scientific nonsense.
Abortion is a family matter, not a social one. the family that aborts simple annihilates their own existence from the future of their genetic path being part of life evolving here now.RebelGator » 26 Apr 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump did nothing to keep you little bitches from killing your children.
Debate?ScottMon » 26 Apr 2023, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑ And you think you're winning this debate? It's hard to complain when you don't even exist.
it is completely inaccurate. when a person or self anointed group will eliminate anyone that doesn't comply with denying genetics eternally separates current population leaves everyone corrupted since arriving great great grandchild replacing their 4 [previous generation DNA donors making them completely unique as eternally separated now equality of being here so far.RebelGator » 27 Apr 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Debate?
You're fundamentally flawed if you think you're winning anything by killing human beings.
Nothing you posted changes my argument. Once again, Your word choice is your downfall.
I am glad you aren't a doctor. You can't tell the difference between a fetus and a baby.RebelGator » 27 Apr 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Debate?
You're fundamentally flawed if you think you're winning anything by killing human beings.