Liberal Forum

Xavier_Onassis » 27 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm

The smartest person to have been proposed as a candidate is clearly Pete Buttigieg.
The savviest person with regard to economics is Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The most effective governor that has been proposed is Gavin Newsome.

I will vote for anyone that runs against Trump or DiSantis, as both of them are totally unacceptable.

Everyone sees the effectiveness of Newsome. Golden State was turned gold into lead.

...watch comedian jon stewart b!tch-slap your smarmy, 'conservative', puppet-sucking haircut [and monetary ignoramus] ... he's learned little/nothing since the bush/kerry $election...

     

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE&t=542s

 

 

Xavier_Onassis » 27 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm

The smartest person to have been proposed as a candidate is clearly Pete Buttigieg.
The savviest person with regard to economics is Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The most effective governor that has been proposed is Gavin Newsome.

I will vote for anyone that runs against Trump or DiSantis, as both of them are totally unacceptable.

..."the smartest person ((((((TO HAVE BEEN PROPO$ED)))))) ....                 

((((((DON'T VOTE FOR REPUBLICRATS!! IT ONLY ENCOURAGES THE $HIT-PUPPET$ AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THE $HIT-PUPPETMA$TER$))))))

Jantje_Smit » 28 Apr 2023, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 6:26 am

Who proposed that?

 

He is the smartest guy that has been proposed as a candidate.
I do not actually care about anyone's sexual preference, it would make zero difference to his performance as president.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 8:51 am

He is the smartest guy that has been proposed as a candidate.
I do not actually care about anyone's sexual preference, it would make zero difference to his performance as president.
 

I am sure glad I am more instinctive than he is intellectual smarter than everyone equally occupying space now.

Punch » 27 Apr 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2023, 11:24 am

He would be a strong candidate. The Republicans, admittedly, have a deep roster. The Dems have an addle-minded octogenarian. It's a toss up.

I'd probably vote for Tucker in the Primaries.  That is, unless Trump can convince me otherwise.
 

Skans » 28 Apr 2023, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:08 am

I'd probably vote for Tucker in the Primaries.  That is, unless Trump can convince me otherwise.
 

My instincts tell me Tucker would make same kind of President Dennis Kucinich would have been had he got the office. same **** he was as councilman and mayor of Cleveland.

Trump I voted for him last two times, but his latests **** has me leaning to DeSantis for a go around. At least he has military experience to be a commander in chief so he is aware as to why diplomacy only goes so far and last for a short period of time.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:19 am

My instincts tell me Tucker would make same kind of President Dennis Kucinich would have been had he got the office. same **** he was as councilman and mayor of Cleveland.

Trump I voted for him last two times, but his latests **** has me leaning to DeSantis for a go around. At least he has military experience to be a commander in chief so he is aware as to why diplomacy only goes so far and last for a short period of time.

Desantis is a definite possibility to get my vote in the Primaries.  Haven't made my mind up yet.
 

Skans » 28 Apr 2023, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:25 am

Desantis is a definite possibility to get my vote in the Primaries.  Haven't made my mind up yet.
 

This is sarcasm,

society already made your mind up for you, your brain has to decide the lesser of evils given to pick from to protect the ideas you hold above mutually evolving forward as one of a kind now..

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2023/04/26 ... ve-matrix/

Tucker Carlson is a virulent empire propagandist who’s probably responsible for more anti-China sentiment in the US than anyone alive. He’s got well-documented overlaps with the CIA and has helped keep Americans roped into the mainstream two-party system. That said, his firing suggests that he probably did become unacceptably inconvenient for the powerful in some way. The mass media are for propaganda first and profit second, and if you’re not useful enough at the first it doesn’t matter how good you are at generating the second.

Carlson is not antiwar in any meaningful way, but from an antiwar perspective I can’t see any reason to be happy about his ouster. The guy who opposed brinkmanship with Russia because he wants to focus on brinkmanship with China will be replaced by someone who wants brinkmanship with both....

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Apr 2023, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 8:51 am

He is the smartest guy that has been proposed as a candidate.
I do not actually care about anyone's sexual preference, it would make zero difference to his performance as president.

That wasn't the question, who proposed him as a candidate?

And who of the two is going to be the first husband...

 


 
 

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:28 am

This is sarcasm,

society already made your mind up for you, your brain has to decide the lesser of evils given to pick from to protect the ideas you hold above mutually evolving forward as one of a kind now..

 

...both of you puppet-sucking monetary ignoramuses will be voting for the same republic#nt $hit-puppet on $election day... wordle...   

#f@ckingidiots
 

peepee » 28 Apr 2023, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:47 am

:rofl:  

...both of you puppet-sucking monetary ignoramuses will be voting for the same republic#nt $hit-puppet on $election day... wordle...  ;)  

#f@ckingidiots
 

This is instinctive awareness that doesn't give a **** about your intellectual wannabe anything else than your genetic time displaced here now. stfu. I say this as an equal evolving reproduction adapting to the moment here.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 9:51 am

This is instinctive awareness that doesn't give a **** about your intellectual wannabe anything else than your genetic time displaced here now. stfu. I say this as an equal evolving reproduction adapting to the moment here.

...your 'instincts' have led you to suck the cacks    of the red puppet$ in monetary ignorance... you've adapted into a blathering, puppet-sucking old fool...    
 
 

peepee » 28 Apr 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 10:01 am

...your 'instincts' have led you to suck the cacks  :o   of the red puppet$ in monetary ignorance... you've adapted into a blathering, puppet-sucking old fool...    
 
 

that is your projection of possibilities and like most beliefs, always falling short of how life actually is evolving.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 10:03 am

that is your projection of possibilities and like most beliefs, always falling short of how life actually is evolving.

...like your voting for the 'lesser-evil' possibility among the $hit-puppet$?   

...#oldblatheringpuppet-suckingmonetaryignoramus


 

peepee » 28 Apr 2023, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 10:11 am

...like your voting for the 'lesser-evil' possibility among the $hit-puppet$?  :rofl:  

...#oldblatheringpuppet-suckingmonetaryignoramus


 

when surrounded by the corrupted by doubt, to survive punishment for being honest, one have to choose which does the least corrupting. that ain't you.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 10:12 am

when surrounded by the corrupted by doubt, to survive punishment for being honest, one have to choose which does the least corrupting. that ain't you.

...lame excuse ^^^ for being a puppet-sucking republic#nt... [and monetary ignoramus]    

peepee » 28 Apr 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2023, 10:16 am

...lame excuse ^^^ for being a puppet-sucking republic#nt... [and monetary ignoramus]   :loco:  

You are able to intellectual typecast other people into a caricature, but will you ever stop performing as a stereotypical malcontent loathing the skin you are in?

The chance that the Republican Party would nominate the Figplucker as its presidential candidate is ZERO. BUPKISS, ZILCH.