Liberal Forum

https://www.bigiftrue.org/2019/12/13/fa ... 0testimony.

maineman » 12 May 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 1:02 pm

So you have no video evidence of him breaking into the capitol, but since you believe the totally unsubstantiated and ridiculous meme that he is somehow an FBI inside guy, you believe it without evidence.

People who merely entered the capitol and did not use force to break barriers or attack LEOs or steal stuff once they were inside were not indicted

Oh... and you avoided my question about the video evidence of Schiff, Brennan, and Hillary committing felonies.  Any word on when that will be forthcoming?

https://youtu.be/erafzh-YahE



 

Buffalo » 12 May 2023, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 5:39 pm

https://youtu.be/erafzh-YahE

Like I said:  So you have no video evidence of him breaking into the capitol.


yawn

maineman » 12 May 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 5:46 pm

Like I said:  So you have no video evidence of him breaking into the capitol.

yawn

  What's hilarious is that trump supporters say they aren't sheep. But yet in the very same breath they say that Epps incited them to storm the Capitol.
 The problem with that line is who summoned them thers in the first place? Who told them to march on the Capitol? Who told them they need to fight like hell? Who tweeted that Pence certified the results?
 Not Epps but Trump.
These **** won't admit that they supported the Jan. 6th insurrection. But they admit to being sheep.
 

maineman » 12 May 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 5:46 pm

Like I said:  So you have no video evidence of him breaking into the capitol.

yawn

"supporting seditious insurrectionists should be a capital offense."

"I will say that I don't think the video of Ray Epps and his bullhorn contains evidence of criminal behavior on his part."

"anyone who hasn't called for the imprisonment of the mob who stormed the capitol on 1/6/21."

"I distrust your sources, you distrust mine.  Surprised by that?"

"I will say that I don't think the video of Ray Epps and his bullhorn contains evidence of criminal behavior on his part."

"I have seen no footage of Epps breaking anything.  And he certainly didn't incite anyone."

"So you have no video evidence of him breaking into the capitol, but since you believe the totally unsubstantiated and ridiculous meme that he is somehow an FBI inside guy, you believe it without evidence.

People who merely entered the capitol and did not use force to break barriers or attack LEOs or steal stuff once they were inside were not indicted"

First you deny that a video of Epps with a bullhorn is telling people to go into the Capitol is not criminal behavior.  Then you call accuse anyone of supporting inssurection if they don't call for imprisonment of anyone who stormed the Capitol.  Epps called for storming the Capitol with a bullhorn, yet you deny him doing any wrong.  Then you deny video proof of Epps actions.  Then you change denying his actions as inciting people to break into the Capitol to no video evidence of HIM breaking into the Capitol.  If people who merely "entered the Capital and did not use force or attack LEOs or steal stuff were not indicted" is a **** LIE.

You have changed the goal posts, deflected, and lied about Epps.  

You are a ****, lying , liberal IDIOT!!!  

 

maineman » 11 May 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

11 May 2023, 4:51 pm

you "admit I am right" but, in the next post say I am "feigning my history".  Pick a side, any side... but then, for chrissakes, stick to it.

You confuse easily. You were correct about the acronym NWP. That's it. How you came about knowing it can't be proven, so yes, you still could be feigning your history, no matter what you claim. Even your simple mind should have the ability to grasp that.

DeplorablePatriot » 13 May 2023, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 10:42 am

You confuse easily. You were correct about the acronym NWP. That's it. How you came about knowing it can't be proven, so yes, you still could be feigning your history, no matter what you claim. Even your simple mind should have the ability to grasp that.

So it WASN'T some litmus test as you originally stated?

Got it.  You're dismissed.  The CS1 in the galley has a big ol' sack of spuds with your name on it.  Loser.

maineman » 12 May 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 3:23 pm

TLDR
TLDW

Gee, what a surprise!
You first demand proof that Epps, Hillary, and Brenned committed felonies, then can't be bothered to read the proof I posted.
So if you prefer to run away like the ****** you are, that's fine.
I expected nothing less!
 

Zeets2 » 13 May 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 3:30 pm

Gee, what a surprise!
You first demand proof that Epps, Hillary, and Brenned committed felonies, then can't be bothered to read the proof I posted.
So if you prefer to run away like the ****** you are, that's fine.
I expected nothing less!

I read just enough to know you didn't provide any proof of any of that.

Like I said earlier... you really can't be accused of INCITING anything when you suggest that people do something IN THE FUTURE.  

maineman » 13 May 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 3:44 pm

I read just enough to know you didn't provide any proof of any of that.

Like I said earlier... you really can't be accused of INCITING anything when you suggest that people do something IN THE FUTURE.

So you do not deny that Epps did, in fact, incite people to go INTO the Capitol on J5?  And the next day is "IN THE FUTURE"?   

I bet the sloppy ho is your hero!!!

Watch the 29 second video of the bitch...

https://hannity.com/media-room/new-pass ... lad-watch/  
 

Buffalo » 13 May 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 4:58 pm

So you do not deny that Epps did, in fact, incite people to go INTO the Capitol on J5?  And the next day is "IN THE FUTURE"?   

I bet the sloppy ho is your hero!!!

Watch the 29 second video of the bitch...

https://hannity.com/media-room/new-pass ... lad-watch/

incitement is an immediate reaction.  One doesn't sleep on it.

Buffalo » 13 May 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 4:58 pm

So you do not deny that Epps did, in fact, incite people to go INTO the Capitol on J5?  And the next day is "IN THE FUTURE"?   

I bet the sloppy ho is your hero!!!

Watch the 29 second video of the bitch...

https://hannity.com/media-room/new-pass ... lad-watch/

and urging people to GO into the capitol the next day or next week or next month is not inciting them to BREAK INTO the capitol.


there's that.  

maineman » 13 May 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 3:44 pm

I read just enough to know you didn't provide any proof of any of that.

Like I said earlier... you really can't be accused of INCITING anything when you suggest that people do something IN THE FUTURE.

Your overuse of laughing emojis and caps indicates anxiety and desperation. I'm surprised that you don't use a sixpack of exclamations as a topping. False confidence.  
 

DeplorablePatriot » 13 May 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 7:47 pm

Your overuse of laughing emojis and caps indicates anxiety and desperation. I'm surprised that you don't use a sixpack of exclamations as a topping. False confidence.

Actually, the occasional use of laughing emojis is an expression of the humor I find in the assertion that someone asking a group of people to enter the capitol at some future point in time is tantamount to inciting a crowd to immediately break into the capitol.  It really IS funny.  I don't need any exclamation points to emphasize that point.   It stands on its own... it's why I didn't use them.  The laughing emojis confidently stand on their own.  Now... don't you have some potatoes to peel, mess cook?
 
 

maineman » 13 May 2023, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 9:05 pm

Actually, the occasional use of laughing emojis is an expression of the humor I find in the assertion that someone asking a group of people to enter the capitol at some future point in time is tantamount to inciting a crowd to immediately break into the capitol.  It really IS funny.  I don't need any exclamation points to emphasize that point.   It stands on its own... it's why I didn't use them.  The laughing emojis confidently stand on their own.  Now... don't you have some potatoes to peel, mess cook?

You are and always have been a goddamn liar!!!  Here in this video ON JAN 6 the DAY of the Protest is Epps inciting his people to "GO INTO THE CAPITOL".

"After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol."

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/v ... d-n1526858

The video showing him walking this line is a clinic in gaslighting.

https://rumble.com/vo7gkb-ray-epps-quic ... ation.html
 

maineman » 13 May 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 3:44 pm

I read just enough to know you didn't provide any proof of any of that.

Like I said earlier... you really can't be accused of INCITING anything when you suggest that people do something IN THE FUTURE.

So explain why they scrubbed his picture from the original compilation of those to be arrested despite seeing him breaking through the barriers and instructing people with his bullhorn before he was even questioned when hundreds of others who did far less were arrested and thrown in jail without getting their rights to make a phone call or contact an attorney?

You're flopping around in such a weak attempt to defend the indefensible that you look like a fool, just as you did trying to defend Hillary, Hunter, and Brennen for THEIR obvious felonies!  

Keep it up!  Your **** gets more and more unbelievable with every passing day!
 

maineman » 13 May 2023, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2023, 9:05 pm

Actually, the occasional use of laughing emojis is an expression of the humor I find in the assertion that someone asking a group of people to enter the capitol at some future point in time is tantamount to inciting a crowd to immediately break into the capitol.  It really IS funny.  I don't need any exclamation points to emphasize that point.   It stands on its own... it's why I didn't use them.  The laughing emojis confidently stand on their own.  Now... don't you have some potatoes to peel, mess cook?

I must have rumpled your stilt skin. Quite a dissertation you made there. 

Zeets2 » 14 May 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2023, 9:35 am

So explain why they scrubbed his picture from the original compilation of those to be arrested despite seeing him breaking through the barriers and instructing people with his bullhorn before he was even questioned when hundreds of others who did far less were arrested and thrown in jail without getting their rights to make a phone call or contact an attorney?


 

Scrubbed his picture?  I have no idea what you are talking about.  

And I didn't see him breaking through any barriers.  I saw him walking through a previously breached barrier along with lots of other folks.  

And nobody has a right to a phone call or an attorney before they are detained.
 

Buffalo » 14 May 2023, 2:30 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2023, 2:30 am

You are and always have been a goddamn liar!!!  Here in this video ON JAN 6 the DAY of the Protest is Epps inciting his people to "GO INTO THE CAPITOL".

"After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol."

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/v ... d-n1526858

The video showing him walking this line is a clinic in gaslighting.

https://rumble.com/vo7gkb-ray-epps-quic ... ation.html

Epps with a bullhorn urging people to go into the capitol was January 5th, not 6th

maineman » 14 May 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 May 2023, 1:39 pm

Epps with a bullhorn urging people to go into the capitol was January 5th, not 6th

So.....your defense is.....it was pre-meditated?

You must do a lot of pro bono work.