Liberal Forum

It's not uncommon for the left to reply with "are you doctor in ____________? If not, then you are not an expert." This could be a biologist when referring to the transgender argument, a climatologist when referring to climate change, or a virologist when it comes to vaccines. They frequently use this when people differ in an opinion from their own agenda..."Do you have a Phd in blah blah blah..." 

Then we have Bill Gates who is always at the front lines of advocating for vaccines. The left have no issue with him being a spokesman for the Covid vaccines. Where is his Phd? His field is computers and software. He doesn't have a degree in anything. Yet, not a peep from the left. 


I have said it a million times, and I will say it again. You cannot be a lefty without being a hypocrite. It cannot be done. 

Bill Gates is smarter than you.
The Righties were impressed by Trump because Trump was ostensibly a billionaire.
Therefore, he was smarter than them, because they were not even millionaires.
Trump only had a BS from a business school. Michael Bloomberg started much poorer than Trump, and also was from Queens like Trump.

Trump claimed hat he was worth TEN BILLION DOLLARS! But hen he said that half of that was simply the name TRUMP.
Why didn't you chuckleheads laugh at that? It was such a huge lie.

Bill Gates is famous in the field of human diseases because he has donated millions to prevent several ghastly diseases: river blindness Guinea worm and malaria. He has prevented thousands of people from suffering, going blind or dying.

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 10:46 am

Bill Gates is smarter than you.
The Righties were impressed by Trump because Trump was ostensibly a billionaire.
Therefore, he was smarter than them, because they were not even millionaires.
Trump only had a BS from a business school. Michael Bloomberg started much poorer than Trump, and also was from Queens like Trump.

Trump claimed hat he was worth TEN BILLION DOLLARS! But hen he said that half of that was simply the name TRUMP.
Why didn't you chuckleheads laugh at that? It was such a huge lie.

Bill Gates is famous in the field of human diseases because he has donated millions to prevent several ghastly diseases: river blindness Guinea worm and malaria. He has prevented thousands of people from suffering, going blind or dying.

Look at this ****..just look at this. XO desperately trying to rationalize his side's blatant stupidity and double standard. Your attempt to justify your hypocrisy is weak and it has no solid ground. Get over yourself. 

 

Once more, Vegas demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The stupid are so stupid that they are unaware of their stupidity.
The ignorant are so aggressively ignorant that they are incapable of understanding how very little they know.

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 10:54 am

Once more, Vegas demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger effect.
The stupid are so stupid that they are unaware of their stupidity.
The ignorant are so aggressively ignorant that they are incapable of understanding how very little they know.

You literally just described yourself. The irony. 

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 10:46 am

Bill Gates is smarter than you.
The Righties were impressed by Trump because Trump was ostensibly a billionaire.
Therefore, he was smarter than them, because they were not even millionaires.
Trump only had a BS from a business school. Michael Bloomberg started much poorer than Trump, and also was from Queens like Trump.

Trump claimed hat he was worth TEN BILLION DOLLARS! But hen he said that half of that was simply the name TRUMP.
Why didn't you chuckleheads laugh at that? It was such a huge lie.

Bill Gates is famous in the field of human diseases because he has donated millions to prevent several ghastly diseases: river blindness Guinea worm and malaria. He has prevented thousands of people from suffering, going blind or dying.

and.........he's still not a Dr or a phd.

sunburn » 01 May 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:36 am

and.........he's still not a Dr or a phd.

Anyone with a PhD is a Dr. dimwit.
Bill Gates is a brilliant man, even if he does not have a degree.
And you appear to be a dummy without even an idea what a PhD is.

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:39 am

Anyone with a PhD is a Dr. dimwit.
Bill Gates is a brilliant man, even if he does not have a degree.
And you appear to be a dummy without even an idea what a PhD is.

Yeah yeah yeah...and Elon Musk is even smarter, but according to you, he is an idiot because he stands against your agenda. God, you are so **** pathetic. Your hypocrisy is insufferable. 


Oh wait...he bought Twitter for 44 billion, thus that will be your go-to response. Guess what, cupcake? Your cowardly response does nothing to negate his intelligence. Not a damn thing. 

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:39 am

Anyone with a PhD is a Dr. dimwit.
Bill Gates is a brilliant man, even if he does not have a degree.
And you appear to be a dummy without even an idea what a PhD is.

if someone is "brilliant" but not a climatologist, what disqualifies them from commenting on climate change then?

sunburn » 01 May 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:45 am

if someone is "brilliant" but not a climatologist, what disqualifies them from commenting on climate change then?

This is not the topic here, of course.
It does no good to tell the right wing fools that climate change does not exist or that humans have caused it, because they will quote people THEY claim to be the experts.

Still, Bill Gates has proven by his actions that he is an expert, perhaps a self-taught one, on many subjects.
He does not deserve to be called a fraud by fools like you and Vegas.

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:59 am

This is not the topic here, of course.
It does no good to tell the right wing fools that climate change does not exist or that humans have caused it, because they will quote people THEY claim to be the experts.

Still, Bill Gates has proven by his actions that he is an expert, perhaps a self-taught one, on many subjects.
He does not deserve to be called a fraud by fools like you and Vegas.

but, again if you could read, the OP prefaced the discussion with the climate change nazi's always saying, are you a Dr in                  .
it is part of the question.  an if/then situation.
Just because someone donates billions of dollars doesn't make them an expert, it just buys them a voice in the matter.
no one said Bill Gates is a fraud, they said 20% of the papers are fraud. The OP just questioned why the CCnazis use that catch all phrase/question when they are guilty of the same thing.
Your reading skills leave a lot to be desired.

The millions that Gates has contributed to fighting diseases have been demonstrably effective.
Why do you bring Elon Musk into this?

Was buying Twitter wise? It does not appear so at the moment, but who knows?
If I had $44 billion, I would have not given in the the urge to buy Twitter. How about you?

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:59 am

This is not the topic here, of course.
It does no good to tell the right wing fools that climate change does not exist or that humans have caused it, because they will quote people THEY claim to be the experts.

Still, Bill Gates has proven by his actions that he is an expert, perhaps a self-taught one, on many subjects.
He does not deserve to be called a fraud by fools like you and Vegas.

Bill Gates is a pedophile, groomer.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 11:59 am

This is not the topic here, of course.
It does no good to tell the right wing fools that climate change does not exist or that humans have caused it, because they will quote people THEY claim to be the experts.

Still, Bill Gates has proven by his actions that he is an expert, perhaps a self-taught one, on many subjects.
He does not deserve to be called a fraud by fools like you and Vegas.

Unless, of course, Gates disagrees with your view, then your narcissistic *** will call him a fraud. 

Pathetic. God, I hate narcissist. You people are retarded. 

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 12:16 pm

The millions that Gates has contributed to fighting diseases have been demonstrably effective.
Why do you bring Elon Musk into this?

Was buying Twitter wise? It does not appear so at the moment, but who knows?
If I had $44 billion, I would have not given in the the urge to buy Twitter. How about you?

Because you are claiming that being smart is enough. Musk is smarter than Gates, but he disagrees with your view. 

How do you not see your blatant double standard? Seriously, how can you possibly not see it? it is so **** obvious. 

Cedar » 01 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 12:21 pm

Bill Gates is a pedophile, groomer.

That is a lie, and you are a scumbag for posting it.

Because you are claiming that being smart is enough. Musk is smarter than Gates, but he disagrees with your view.

I do not think that anyone has shown that Musk is smarter than Gates, or vice versa.
What view of Musk's is it that I disagree with?
I did not say that his buying Twitter was wrong, I said that if I were faced with this choice, I would not choose to buy Twitter.
Gates has helped people to prevent dying of a variety of diseases, and there was no possible direct financial benefit in his doing this.

Again, if YOU had $44 billion, would YOU have bough Twitter? If so, why?

According to the prospectuses of some mutual funds I own, I have some investments in MSFT, but none in TSLA.

The ticker MSFT is rather similar to the word "misfit".
M is the ticker for Macy's, MIFT sounds like "miffed", MT is Archelor Mittal, MC is MasterCard, and MF is, well, "****", so perhaps MSFT is the best choice.

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 1:38 pm

Because you are claiming that being smart is enough. Musk is smarter than Gates, but he disagrees with your view.

I do not think that anyone has shown that Musk is smarter than Gates, or vice versa.
What view of Musk's is it that I disagree with?
I did not say that his buying Twitter was wrong, I said that if I were faced with this choice, I would not choose to buy Twitter.
Gates has helped people to prevent dying of a variety of diseases, and there was no possible direct financial benefit in his doing this.

Again, if YOU had $44 billion, would YOU have bough Twitter? If so, why?

According to the prospectuses of some mutual funds I own, I have some investments in MSFT, but none in TSLA.

The ticker MSFT is rather similar to the word "misfit".
M is the ticker for Macy's, MIFT sounds like "miffed", MT is Archelor Mittal, MC is MasterCard, and MF is, well, "****", so perhaps MSFT is the best choice.

There isn't one word of this that is relevant to the discussion. Not one **** word.

And learn how to quote people. it isn't hard:

Step 1: Copy/paste the section you wish to quote in your response area.
Step 2: Highlight it. 
Step 3: Click the quote command on the toolbar : (")
Step 4: Write your usual hypocritical crap about the quote.
Step 5: repeat. ​​​​​​​

You were comparing Musk and Gates. I was referring to the same thing.

However, I discovered in this research that there is a company called ArcelorMittal, S.A., headquartered in Luxembourg that mines and processes steel, whose shares are selling at $29.02 that paid a quarterly dividend of $1.37 last quarter. Fidelity says that it is very undervalued and is quite healthy. That is 4.8% a LOT for a quarterly dividend.

Has anyone else ever heard of ArcelorMittal, SA, symbol MT?

Xavier_Onassis » 01 May 2023, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 May 2023, 1:25 pm

That is a lie, and you are a scumbag for posting it.

You don't know if it is a lie or not .....
but Gates did spend a great amount of time with Epstein.....

​​