Liberal Forum

razoo » 05 May 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 8:55 pm

None could have been born without the sperm .............................

^^^ The entire POST went right over he pointy little head.

It ALWAYS DOES when you are dealing with an abject IDIOT LWNJ.

roadkill » 05 May 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 8:50 pm

Wait...the left can't define a woman.  Maybe we should wait for a report to come out.   

Oh, they have a report already and it gives them 87 different "genders" that they can PRETEND to be and not be called "mentally ill"!!

Which happens to be the PROBLEM in the first place, but they are WAY to stupid to figure that one out.

Beekeeper » 04 May 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2023, 1:00 pm

.
0 Were given birth by men.

PROVE ME WRONG!!

YOUR **** UP...BABIES COME FROM STORKS !!!
.
..

razoo » 05 May 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 8:55 pm

None could have been born without the sperm .............................

So what you JUST SAID is that NO MAN can give birth TO ANY BABIES!!

You LWNJs would argue that black is white. OH WAIT, you alctually believe that and have people ALREADY SAYING THAT THEY "identify" as BLACK in a WHITE PERSON'S BODY!!

See how EFFING MORONIC YOU IDIOTS SOUND???

Beekeeper » 06 May 2023, 5:24 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 5:24 am

Oh, they have a report already and it gives them 87 different "genders" that they can PRETEND to be and not be called "mentally ill"!!

Which happens to be the PROBLEM in the first place, but they are WAY to stupid to figure that one out.

87 eh...I lost count a while back.     

roadkill » 06 May 2023, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 6:44 am

87 eh...I lost count a while back.   

I'm afraid that is wrong.... You ain't gonna believe it anyway.....105 now for 2023. Next year it will surely DOUBLE!!!

Main Document
Gender identity is what someone feels is their gender. That means that how someone's private parts or how they look has nothing to do with their gender identity. Different terms, descriptions, and labels exist for other gender identities.

 Gender identity can be understood to include how someone describes themselves, how they present, and how they feel. Below are 105 gender identities currently listed for 2023. (These are the more commonly known gender identities - as listed on Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gender_identities - and is subject to change at any time.)

https://www.sexualdiversity.org/edu/1111.php

Beekeeper » 06 May 2023, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 7:03 am

I'm afraid that is wrong.... You ain't gonna believe it anyway.....105 now for 2023. Next year it will surely DOUBLE!!!

Yeah...I heard 100+ at some point.  It's a strange strange world we live in Master Jack.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDH9G-qWM8Q
 

razoo » 06 May 2023, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 7:29 am

There are no babies without male sperm form some source .............. which begs the question why is it that women get so much **** for becoming pregnant considering without male sperm this cannot happen?

Women cannot become pregnant without male sperm = men step up and support all of the babies you have created without permission !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

tell that to the brothers in the hood

razoo » 06 May 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 7:35 am

You don't know this .................. neither do fake right wing news sources

what are they?

razoo » 06 May 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 7:35 am

You don't know this .................. neither do fake right wing news sources

So...you think men can be women? Does that mean you can define what a woman is? The forum would like to read yer definition.   TIA

Xavier_Onassis » 05 May 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 3:53 pm

So what?

The ability to give birth does not distinguish all women from men.\
Only women can give birth, and so what?
girls who are too young cannot give birth.
Women who have passed menopause cannot give birth/
Women who do not wish to give birth should have the right to not give birth.

No one needs silly right wing men to pass laws forcing women to give birth.

No man in the history of the earth has ever given birth to another person, so stop with the stupid games. Nothing you said there negates what a woman is. If you actually believe a man can become a woman and vise versa, you are a science denying moron... or a leftist. So get out of here with your propaganda O'Brien. 
 

roadkill » 05 May 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 9:09 pm

Gay is determined by the environment they live in.  There is NO genetic predisposition to becoming gay.  

Racism is mostly a construct by the left.  The dems' KKK notwithstanding.

There is no proof that homosexuality is caused by environment in every case. The best study on sexuality is that your sexual preference is more like your preference of different kinds of food. You can't really control what you like.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 May 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 10:22 am

Why not pass a law making it illegal for women to wear pants and other items of men's clothing?

Why would we do that? This isn't about what someone wants to do with their life. It is about forcing other people to go along with a mental illness and pushing that mental illness on children. Stop being a pathetic lying leftist for just one minute. 

Beekeeper » 05 May 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 6:35 pm

So you are saying that you believe that giving birth is NOT EXCLUSIVE TO WOMEN since you SAID....

"The ability to give birth does not distinguish all women from men"

So you can SHOW US ANY MAN that has given birth to VALIDATE YOUR **** CLAIM, right Dr PEDO???]]

Yer an IDIOT.

Can a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man?
 
 

It does not actually matter whether a man can actually turn into a woman. The issue is the right of the man in question to entertain his own personal desires. If a man chooses to wear women's clothing and makeup, it does not harm anyone. Nor does it harm anyone but the man or woman in question to have their genitals surgically altered to resemble the genitals of the opposite sex.

Women in the 1800's were prohibited from  wearing pants or straddling a horse. They were expected to ride sidesaddle.

Xavier_Onassis » 08 May 2023, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2023, 10:26 am

It does not actually matter whether a man can actually turn into a woman. The issue is the right of the man in question to entertain his own personal desires. If a man chooses to wear women's clothing and makeup, it does not harm anyone. Nor does it harm anyone but the man or woman in question to have their genitals surgically altered to resemble the genitals of the opposite sex.

Women in the 1800's were prohibited from  wearing pants or straddling a horse. They were expected to ride sidesaddle.

Why do you incessantly avoid the real issue? God man. You pedos are such **** cowards. It's not about their personal choice. It's about them pushing their **** onto women. Women have a right to privacy, whether you like that or not. Understand? They have a right to their own bathroom without some dude walking in on them. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that? 

**** coward. 

Vegas » 08 May 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2023, 10:32 am

Why do you incessantly avoid the real issue? God man. You pedos are such **** cowards. It's not about their personal choice. It's about them pushing their **** onto women. Women have a right to privacy, whether you like that or not. Understand? They have a right to their own bathroom without some dude walking in on them. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that? 

**** coward.

This is a non issue.  Men rarely bother to enter women's bathrooms. There are millions of public bathrooms in this country, and the number of incidences of men dressed as women invading women's bathrooms to rape women is exceedingly rare. So far, all the fools protesting transsexuals are men.

Most big box stores have THREE restrooms, one for men, another for women, and a unisex bathroom, which I think is intended for mothers caring for sons or fathers caring for daughters.

I have observed that public bathrooms have stalls with doors on them, which gives all the privacy anyone could actually need.

Xavier_Onassis » 08 May 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2023, 10:41 am

This is a non issue.  Men rarely bother to enter women's bathrooms. 

God Dammit XO. I am so sick of your willful ignorance. You know damn well this is happening. It's all over the **** news. Now knock this **** off. 

I am so sick of you lying. **** pedo piece of ****. 

Beekeeper » 05 May 2023, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2023, 7:42 am

Sow here are @ScottMon   and @Xavier_Onassis   weighing in with MORE of their LWNJ **** that "men can have babies too"???

The entertainment value is pretty off the wall.

As usual, You're trying to win an argument by putting words in my mouth.  Yes, Only biological human females can carry a baby to term.   Here's the point you DON'T get:  If someone wants to put on lipstick or a dress and change their pronouns, I don't give a ****.  I will respect their wishes and go about my day.