Liberal Forum

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

all just part of the plan, eliminate as many people on Earth as possible.

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:18 am

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

Not long. How INSANE!
 

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:18 am

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

Hmm, so Covid health safety went 100x overboard.

But *** can blows AIDS loads into the blood supply.

America is a wreck.
 

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:18 am

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

what does MSM mean?

jerrab » 12 May 2023, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 10:29 am

what does MSM mean?

men who have sex with men
 

Sumela » 12 May 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:52 am

Hmm, so Covid health safety went 100x overboard.

But *** can blows AIDS loads into the blood supply.

America is a wreck.

a train wreck...as soon as I heard the FDA was "following the science", my nostrils flared...
 

sunburn » 12 May 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:28 am

all just part of the plan, eliminate as many people on Earth as possible.

sure looks like... all in the name of stigma...

sootedupCyndi » 12 May 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:51 am

Not long. How INSANE!

totally...

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:18 am

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

Hey!, you seen those commercials about the drugs treating Aids to where it doesn't register on tests. What makes you believe the blood supply hasn't been contaminated already.

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 2:02 pm

men who have sex with men

thanks

jerra b » 12 May 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 3:25 pm

thanks

there were a lot of people infected with HIV without having sex. Shared needles doing drugs, contaminated blood supply, wound to wound between bashers and bashed. Persons intentionally infecting others without their being aware the infected person was a carrier.

Blamers, shamers, flamers are capable of anything to bring down anyone being honest about self evident life since those denying how evolving works naturally block the flow of information how evolving works naturally.

Nostradamus'omh » 12 May 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 2:12 pm

Hey!, you seen those commercials about the drugs treating Aids to where it doesn't register on tests. What makes you believe the blood supply hasn't been contaminated already.

agreed...but at least they got called out on illicit behaviour if honestly answered when questioned....
 

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 4:22 pm

agreed...but at least they got called out on illicit behaviour if honestly answered when questioned....
 

When has anyone been called out change their mind about how evolving works naturally? Everyone dies keeping the secret now was always eternity balancing out each reproduction changing population forward now.

What so you think corruption does? defeats honesty by any means necessary.

I'm pretty sure *** have been giving blood and plasma for a long time. They just lie on the application

Warcok » 12 May 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 4:54 pm

I'm pretty sure *** have been giving blood and plasma for a long time. They just lie on the application

they delude themselves into thinking it is for their civic duty.

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 2:05 pm

a train wreck...as soon as I heard the FDA was "following the science", my nostrils flared...

-----------------------------------------

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/aft ... nate-blood

Gay rights groups have long opposed blanket restrictions on who can give blood, saying they discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Medical societies including the American Medical Association have also said such exclusions are unnecessary given advances in technology to test blood for infectious diseases.
 

jerra b » 12 May 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 5:56 pm

they delude themselves into thinking it is for their civic duty.

delude, convince everyone else, resistance if futile. Passive aggressives always have loyal surrogates do the deeds and fall on the swords of physical and psychological class warfare.

1. mind over matter
2. context rules content(thermodynamic results)
3. symbolism over substance
4 character projection beyond genetic timing adapting to the moment here.
5. stay in character assigned as a great great grandchild until a dead 1 of 16 great great grandparents of 4 more generation gaps added since birth.
6. evolving doesn't exceed series parallel time adapting to the moment here each fertilized cell's nucleus navigates its body after birth never same results twice since conceived.
7. now has always been the dividing point generation gaps lived and living happens no-where else than now-here. Now, own, won, NWO.

ROG62 » 12 May 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 May 2023, 9:18 am

     US Food and Drug Administration on Thursday paved the way for more gay and bisexual men to donate blood by finalizing new risk-based recommendations for blood donation. Going forward, prospective donors will be asked the same set of questions regardless of their sex or sexual orientation. 
     Before the FDA began taking a second look at its guidance several years ago, gay and bisexual men had faced a lifetime ban on blood donation, a move that many said was discriminatory. The most recent policy recommended that men who have sex with men wait three months after sexual contact with other men before they could donate blood.       The policy changes eliminate deferrals and screening questions specific to men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with MSM. It brings the United States in line with other countries such as the UK and Canada, which have also implemented risk-based rules.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/health/b ... index.html

how long before our blood supply is compromised?

I'm not sure *** blood is good blood....AIDS...Monkey Pox....prancing around slinging scat particles all over the place





This post is only meant to offend people who really need offending

All donated blood has been screened for STDs since the 80s

They need all the donations that they can get

I guess they can’t test for the gay in blood… is that the problem?

Afraid you gonna catch the gay?