answer the questionSquatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ Old news.
Brietbart is behind the times.
I'm actually shocked they had a real story.
It happened just down the road from my Aunt's house. 50 miles from me.
Knowing this area well ,the attempted kidnapper is lucky the brother didn't come out with a gun.
Your title has a lot of butt hurt in it though.
Don't like a feel good story?
will the democrats attempt to ban slingshots next?
Are they covered by the 2nd amendment?
Squatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ Old news.
Brietbart is behind the times.
I'm actually shocked they had a real story.
It happened just down the road from my Aunt's house. 50 miles from me.
Knowing this area well ,the attempted kidnapper is lucky the brother didn't come out with a gun.
Your title has a lot of butt hurt in it though.
Don't like a feel good story?
Are you covered by the *******?Squatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ Are they covered by the 2nd amendment?
Answer that one.
It was a great story.roadkill » 15 May 2023, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ It was a great story...someone was saved due to a weapon. Too bad most schools don't protect the kids.
What is the purpose of a feel good story? Best case scenario is misdirection, worst case is corrupt everyone believing it?Squatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ Old news.
Brietbart is behind the times.
I'm actually shocked they had a real story.
It happened just down the road from my Aunt's house. 50 miles from me.
Knowing this area well ,the attempted kidnapper is lucky the brother didn't come out with a gun.
Your title has a lot of butt hurt in it though.
Don't like a feel good story?
Duh!
no they are notSquatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ Are they covered by the 2nd amendment?
Answer that one.
A slingshot is a weapon that could be used for hunting or defense, so of course it would be covered. But again, no one ever try to ban slingshots, just as they won't ban cars or knives.
Xavier_Onassis » 15 May 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ A slingshot is a weapon that could be used for hunting or defense, so of course it would be covered. But again, no one ever try to ban slingshots, just as they won't ban cars or knives.
It is a very stupid question.
You said it was a CRIME to protect others from threats. He hadn't actually done anything TO his sister.Squatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ Old news.
Brietbart is behind the times.
I'm actually shocked they had a real story.
It happened just down the road from my Aunt's house. 50 miles from me.
Knowing this area well ,the attempted kidnapper is lucky the brother didn't come out with a gun.
Your title has a lot of butt hurt in it though.
Don't like a feel good story?
So you are saying that "arms" means slingshots now??Xavier_Onassis » 15 May 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ A slingshot is a weapon that could be used for hunting or defense, so of course it would be covered. But again, no one ever try to ban slingshots, just as they won't ban cars or knives.
It is a very stupid question.
Your reasons are???????
We know you do Professor PEDO!! Is that your "affirmative defense' when you finally get CAUGHT molesting 8-9 year old little boys??
Squatchman » 15 May 2023, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ . No. You can't blow me again.
Z09 got the call this morning.