Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"Durham Report: FBI Should Never Have Begun ‘Russia Collusion’ Investigation"
"Durham Report: FBI Should Never Have Begun ‘Russia Collusion’ Investigation"
By roadkill
15 May 2023 7:06 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 May 2023 10:31 am
You are a *******. Your heroine Hillary Clinton spewed as much. Tell me you retard what similarity do you "Liberals" actually have with classic Liberalism? You **** Marxist scum.Varnaj42 » 16 May 2023, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ My opinion, your opinion, her opinion, his opinion and the opinion of the guy down the street. The nice thing about opinions is that they are free of any need to be right or wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical ... ]Classical liberalism[/b] is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; civil liberties under the rule of law with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. It gained full flowering in the early 18th century, building on ideas stemming at least as far back as the 13th century within the Iberian, Anglo-Saxon, and central European contexts and was foundational to the American Revolution and "American Project" more broadly.[1][2][3]Notable liberal individuals whose ideas contributed to classical liberalism include John Locke,[4] Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. It drew on classical economics, especially the economic ideas as espoused by Adam Smith in Book One of The Wealth of Nations and on a belief in natural law,[5] social progress,[6] and utilitarianism.[7] In contemporary times, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Thomas Sowell, George Stigler and Larry Arnhart are seen as the most prominent advocates of classical liberalism.[8][9]
17 May 2023 10:37 am
Since you're so lazy, why don't you just google them and find out the details for yourself?FredH » 17 May 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ So and since your[sic] are so smart why not a link or two? Why were they not charged? Insiders?
And no one ever claimed they weren't charged. They WERE charged, and taken to trial by Durham, and both were found innocent by juries.
Is English your second language, by the way?
17 May 2023 10:42 am
The point being so what? And they were found not guilty why? Because a Clinton appointed judge and close Hillary Clinton family friend was the judge? You are still trying to say the DOJ is not corrupt when the evidence is in front of your face? *******.maineman » 17 May 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Since you're so lazy, why don't you just google them and find out the details for yourself?
And no one ever claimed they weren't charged. They WERE charged, and taken to trial by Durham, and both were found innocent by juries.
Is English your second language, by the way?
17 May 2023 10:46 am
And I am curious, @FredH ... do you even know the meaning of the word, "MARXIST", or do you simply use it as an epithet, like "***" or "beaner"?
17 May 2023 10:48 am
I guess you really must not know very much about American jurisprudence. Judges don't routinely hand down verdicts in non-bench trials. Juries do.FredH » 17 May 2023, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ The point being so what? And they were found not guilty why? Because a Clinton appointed judge and close Hillary Clinton family friend was the judge? You are still trying to say the DOJ is not corrupt when the evidence is in front of your face? *******.
And your opinion about the DOJ is yours to have and to hold. I do not share it.
*******.
17 May 2023 11:04 am
Durham included the text message between FBI attorney Lisa Page and investigator Peter Strzok:jack » 16 May 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Haven't been here for a few days. I assume the above has been corrected to say that Durham merely claims the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation before starting a full investigation. A nitpick of a criticism but probably the best he could come up with. I mean the guy had to do something to explain the millions he spent in three years while obtaining zero indictments (Mueller's findings led to more than two dozen indictments and eight felony convictions, five of them Trump campaign members).
What we already knew is that for months during the primary season while Trump was out campaigning for votes he was, at the same time, secretly negotiating to build himself a new hotel in....where?...Moscow. Yes, Moscow. He finally let it go when he saw how well he was doing with Republican voters. But, never mind the crimes Durham didn't find, that misadventure alone, when it came to light, should have been enough to cross him off anyone's list of someone to be trusted let alone elected President.
It’s amazing what you can get away with when you’re a Democrat.....Page: One more thing: [Clinton] may be our next president. The last thing you need [is] going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?Strzok: Agreed ….
17 May 2023 11:12 am
We know you don't share it.....maineman » 17 May 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I guess you really must not know very much about American jurisprudence. Judges don't routinely hand down verdicts in non-bench trials. Juries do.
And your opinion about the DOJ is yours to have and to hold. I do not share it.
*******.
Which makes you intellectually and morally inferior ......
17 May 2023 11:41 am
Well you keep proving you are an idiot. If the DOJ is not compromised why is Hunter Biden not in jail? Comey? Wray? Schiff? If you had a brain you might notice the venue of most of these **** court findings is in New York.maineman » 17 May 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I guess you really must not know very much about American jurisprudence. Judges don't routinely hand down verdicts in non-bench trials. Juries do.
And your opinion about the DOJ is yours to have and to hold. I do not share it.
*******.
17 May 2023 11:53 am
Hey stupid the judge refused to force key witnesses to testify or allow testimony from important witnesses that were present, you must know nothing about the control judges have in a courtroom.maineman » 17 May 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I guess you really must not know very much about American jurisprudence. Judges don't routinely hand down verdicts in non-bench trials. Juries do.
And your opinion about the DOJ is yours to have and to hold. I do not share it.
*******.
17 May 2023 11:54 am
17 May 2023 12:23 pm
What evidence?
17 May 2023 12:23 pm
17 May 2023 12:29 pm
Yes, I see……..you have nothing.
17 May 2023 12:32 pm
Why do worship Old Whitey Biden so much??
He is everything you hate. Seems so boring and uninteresting....VanillaFarian
17 May 2023 12:33 pm
17 May 2023 12:39 pm
Marxist is a compliment to you?maineman » 17 May 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ And I am curious, @FredH ... do you even know the meaning of the word, "MARXIST", or do you simply use it as an epithet, like "***" or "beaner"?
17 May 2023 12:40 pm
I have it all...how's the TV reception in yer cave?
17 May 2023 12:41 pm
Are you ever going to decide on a single account?
17 May 2023 12:54 pm
LincolnNebraska » 17 May 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you ever going to decide on a single account?
Good siggy.
17 May 2023 1:40 pm
in your opinion, perhaps.Majik » 17 May 2023, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ We know you don't share it.....
Which makes you intellectually and morally inferior ......
Who is online
In total there are 5843 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 5816 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: MicroMessenger, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, Bolt, proximic, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, Baiduspider, bingbot