roadkill » 15 May 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ "Durham said the Justice Department and FBI acted without “appropriate objectivity or restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and a foreign power,” he said. He also said the FBI used a different standard when it came to looking at Clinton’s campaign."
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... stigation/
nefarious101 » 16 May 2023, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ A Leftist is a mentally ill scumbag hyper-focused on sex, gender, race and has been conditioned by politicos and the media to hate based on sex, gender and race.
Most of them don't even understand why they hate because they are too focused on sex, gender and race. As we have found out they can't even define what a woman is. Their own media can lie to them and make them look like hysterical fools over and over and yet they do not question the media,,,,they just want more and more misinformation....even after it is proven false they still act like it is real while laughing like fools at anyone who disagrees.
I had some moron yesterday who was so dense and child-like that finding a typo in real information made it unacceptable and went into a rant declaring his intellectual superiority....then he followed me around giving me -1 greenies.....dense, child-like unimaginably uninformed...to top it off he calls himself "impartialobserver".....not really sure if he's trying to fool us or himself calling himself that
roadkill » 16 May 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ They've consumed the narratives for so long they can no longer find the exit.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1be0tBroadkill » 15 May 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ "Durham said the Justice Department and FBI acted without “appropriate objectivity or restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and a foreign power,” he said. He also said the FBI used a different standard when it came to looking at Clinton’s campaign."
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... stigation/
That would be ideal, but we all know it won't happen.
The evidence against Sussmann was clear...he lied to the FBI claiming he was a concerned citizen not working for anyone when he lied to the FBI. He was working for Hillary's campaign where the Russian collusion hoax was fabricated.OdeToJoy » 16 May 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1be0tB
In the years since, Durham only secured one conviction in the course of the probe: a mid-level FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an e-mail used in one of the FISA applications used to authorize surveillance against Page.
Last year, the only two other criminal cases brought by Durham ended in acquittals at trial. Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer tied to Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, was found not guilty by a jury last May after Durham accused him of making a false statement to the FBI when Sussmann told a former top lawyer for the bureau that he was not acting on behalf of any client when he detailed allegations of ties between a computer server linked to Trump and a Moscow bank.
Several months later, in October, a jury acquitted intelligence analyst Igor Danchenko on charges of lying to federal investigators about information he collected for the infamous Steele Dossier that included many scandalous and unproven allegations about Trump's ties to Russia.
The conclusion of Durham's four-year investigation stands in contrast to former special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, which resulted in indictments against 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from conspiracy to hacking to lying to the FBI and financial crimes. The indictments led to seven guilty pleas and five people sentenced to prison.
Oh, so you LOVE proving that the DURHAM REPORT was 100% PROOF of POLITICAL BIAS and a 2 tiered JUSTICE SYSTEM.OdeToJoy » 16 May 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1be0tB
In the years since, Durham only secured one conviction in the course of the probe: a mid-level FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an e-mail used in one of the FISA applications used to authorize surveillance against Page.
Last year, the only two other criminal cases brought by Durham ended in acquittals at trial. Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer tied to Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, was found not guilty by a jury last May after Durham accused him of making a false statement to the FBI when Sussmann told a former top lawyer for the bureau that he was not acting on behalf of any client when he detailed allegations of ties between a computer server linked to Trump and a Moscow bank.
Several months later, in October, a jury acquitted intelligence analyst Igor Danchenko on charges of lying to federal investigators about information he collected for the infamous Steele Dossier that included many scandalous and unproven allegations about Trump's ties to Russia.
The conclusion of Durham's four-year investigation stands in contrast to former special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, which resulted in indictments against 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from conspiracy to hacking to lying to the FBI and financial crimes. The indictments led to seven guilty pleas and five people sentenced to prison.
Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, so you LOVE proving that the DURHAM REPORT was 100% PROOF of POLITICAL BIAS and a 2 tiered JUSTICE SYSTEM.
ONE where you cheer if it's a REPUBLICAN that is indicted and possibly convicted WITH LIES, and the OTHER where FACTS and LWNJ JURIES refuse to convict because they are DEMOCRAT DEFENDANTS AND THEIR HENCHMEN AND DONORS!!
The FACTS DON'T CHANGE because convictions are NOT your measuring stick for CORRUPTION OF GOVERNMENT AND THE POLITICIZATION OF THE FBI AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, ASSHOLE!!
Both cases had totally partisan juries and it wasn't in favor of ANY on the right!!!roadkill » 16 May 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ I guess odetojoy has never served on a jury or he would know that the members of the jury are instructed to decide the verdict based ONLY on the evidence presented in the trial. The jury foreman violated that requirement when she said there are other more important issues in our country than finding Sussmann guilty of lying to the FBI. It should be declared a mistrial based on the violation by the jury foreman. There should be a new trial with law abiding citizens in the jury.
I agree with youOdeToJoy » 16 May 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑
The conclusion of Durham's four-year investigation stands in contrast to former special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, which resulted in indictments against 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from conspiracy to hacking to lying to the FBI and financial crimes. The indictments led to seven guilty pleas and five people sentenced to prison.
Yes, for sure, it is. So is blowing up an ally's pipeline.Z09 » 16 May 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Russian Coillusion...
Pee Tapes...
"We Got 'Em Now.."
"Breakin News"..
"Only on MSNBC........"
"This is worst than Watergate..."
And it was one of the biggest lies ever committed on the American people
That's like some one believing that Trump could get a fair trial by an impartial jury in New York or DC. His innocence would be irrelevant...Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ Both cases had totally partisan juries and it wasn't in favor of ANY on the right!!!
Libretards are too stupid to understand that IMPARTIAL JURY part. As long as their side "wins", they love it no matter HOW much evidence there is to prove TOTAL GUILT!!
For what?PhiloBeddo » 16 May 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Hillary and a **** load of FBI agents should go to prison.
Along with the magic negro and braindead biden. They were in on the Trump/Russian hoax (LIE) too!!!PhiloBeddo » 16 May 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Hillary and a **** load of FBI agents should go to prison.