Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 16 May 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:14 pm

  For what?

Damn, you have had to ignore a **** of news to ask that stupid question, squatman!!!
 

Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 10:31 am

Both cases had totally partisan juries and it wasn't in favor of ANY on the right!!!

Libretards are too stupid to understand that IMPARTIAL JURY part. As long as their side "wins", they love it no matter HOW much evidence there is to prove TOTAL GUILT!!

Yep...the left is a 3rd world dishonest ideology.  

roadkill » 15 May 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2023, 7:06 pm

"Durham said the Justice Department and FBI acted without “appropriate objectivity or restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and a foreign power,” he said. He also said the FBI used a different standard when it came to looking at Clinton’s campaign."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... stigation/

….the FBI personnel swore to uphold the Constitution,……and didn’t.
​​​​​​….we should pay for their existence, errr why??

jefftec » 16 May 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:31 pm

….the FBI personnel swore to uphold the Constitution,……and didn’t.
​​​​​​….we should pay for their existence, errr why??

The top dogs in the FBI should be fired and convicted!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You poor,poor bastards!
Maybe Comer should start an investigation.

roadkill » 16 May 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:35 pm

The top dogs in the FBI should be fired and convicted!

….why not dismantle it all and rebuild with new people?
……between all of the existing agencies, there is replication of duties anyway.

Squatchman » 16 May 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:48 pm

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You poor,poor bastards!
Maybe Comer should start an investigation.

…..maybe you should establish a real conscience.

maineman » 15 May 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2023, 8:05 pm

four years... two indictments... two innocent verdicts.
           

You are the poster boy for blithering idiot. This outs the corrupt DOJ and FBI as the reason for your comment. ****.

Squatchman » 16 May 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:48 pm

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You poor,poor bastards!
Maybe Comer should start an investigation.

Hey retard, if the DOJ was not totally corrupt their would be an investigation into the FBI. Is there some reason you feel a government dictatorship is funny? Stupid ****.

Varnaj42 » 16 May 2023, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:03 pm

Under a democrat party staffed by honest, mature men and women it never would have.

The democrat party no longer exists, they are the progressive socialist party pushing a Marxist cultural revolution.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:54 pm

You are the poster boy for blithering idiot. This outs the corrupt DOJ and FBI as the reason for your comment. ****.

what about the two not-guilty verdicts by juries of peers?  

jefftec » 16 May 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:50 pm

….why not dismantle it all and rebuild with new people?
……between all of the existing agencies, there is replication of duties anyway.

Good point...we could clean house and save tax payer money at the same time.     

FredH » 16 May 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:58 pm

The democrat party no longer exists, they are the progressive socialist party pushing a Marxist cultural revolution.

How long did it take you to memorize that Tucker talking point, or do you just have it programmed into a macro?  Just hit CTRL-M and it types itself??

maineman » 16 May 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 1:10 pm

what about the two not-guilty verdicts by juries of peers?

Post links and what abouts.

maineman » 16 May 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 1:11 pm

How long did it take you to memorize that Tucker talking point, or do you just have it programmed into a macro?  Just hit CTRL-M and it types itself??

Hey retard are you really that stupid? The obvious escapes you.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 1:12 pm

Post links and what abouts.

do I look like your **** clipping service?  


but I will toss you two clues:

Sussman and Danchencko

Now you're on your own.

maineman » 16 May 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 1:13 pm

do I look like your **** clipping service?

You are a lying Piece of ****. Why should I believe anything you put out. You squealed Russia Russia Russia spinning your dildo at the same time for years. What a total idiot.

Buffalo » 16 May 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 11:58 am

That's like some one believing that Trump could get a fair trial by an impartial jury in New York or DC.  His innocence would be irrelevant...

Trump could bring FULLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that he wasn't even present, offer 20 witnesses that he wasn't present, show receipts he was in Scotland for a month at the time claimed he was there, complete with date stamped photos that PROVE he wasn't there, along wiht newspaper stories on him at that time showing he wasn't there when he was accused of the act, and the effing IDIOT JURY in either of those places would convict in 15 minutes just because he is Trump.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 12:58 pm

The democrat party no longer exists, they are the progressive socialist party pushing a Marxist cultural revolution.

It still exists in the person of RFK jr.   I hope he can make a difference.

roadkill » 15 May 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2023, 7:06 pm

"Durham said the Justice Department and FBI acted without “appropriate objectivity or restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and a foreign power,” he said. He also said the FBI used a different standard when it came to looking at Clinton’s campaign."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... stigation/

The Durhamrrhea Report never said anything about beginning the investigation. What it stated is it should have not gone into a full investigation but what else can you expect from a Trump sycophant anyway?