Liberal Forum

Pastafarian » 16 May 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 3:35 pm

The Durhamrrhea Report never said anything about beginning the investigation. What it stated is it should have not gone into a full investigation but what else can you expect from a Trump sycophant anyway?

Weird how you worship a Biden

an old, establishment, elitist, white, career criminal politician. 

Not very original are you?  VanillaFarian would be better.


 

Another link well written on the subject.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ckets.html

Varnaj42 » 16 May 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 3:10 pm

It still exists in the person of RFK jr.   I hope he can make a difference.

Well in todays world RFK jr. cannot be called what runs the demrat party. Most of them would call him a RWNJ. In reality he fits in far better with Trump than AOC.

Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 2:04 pm

Trump could bring FULLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that he wasn't even present, offer 20 witnesses that he wasn't present, show receipts he was in Scotland for a month at the time claimed he was there, complete with date stamped photos that PROVE he wasn't there, along wiht newspaper stories on him at that time showing he wasn't there when he was accused of the act, and the effing IDIOT JURY in either of those places would convict in 15 minutes just because he is Trump.

Well you dimwit that is true but then the stupid lying bitch would have to say what the date was she was raped.  Not presenting a date of the incident makes it impossible for a defendant to set up a defense doesn't it.

Pastafarian » 16 May 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 3:35 pm

The Durhamrrhea Report never said anything about beginning the investigation. What it stated is it should have not gone into a full investigation but what else can you expect from a Trump sycophant anyway?

Pastafairy speaks. The evidence scares this commie.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 3:56 pm

Well you dimwit that is true but then the stupid lying bitch would have to say what the date was she was raped.  Not presenting a date of the incident makes it impossible for a defendant to set up a defense doesn't it.

Which is PRECISELY why the appeal is going to toss this case on its head and into the CESSPOOL where it belongs.

It was a complete side show at the circus and not even worth the price of admission.

roadkill » 15 May 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2023, 7:06 pm

"Durham said the Justice Department and FBI acted without “appropriate objectivity or restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and a foreign power,” he said. He also said the FBI used a different standard when it came to looking at Clinton’s campaign."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... stigation/

Haven't been here for a few days. I assume the above has been corrected to say that Durham merely claims the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation before starting a full investigation. A nitpick of a criticism but probably the best he could come up with. I mean the guy had to do something to explain the millions he spent in three years while obtaining zero indictments (Mueller's findings led to more than two dozen indictments and eight felony convictions, five of them Trump campaign members).

What we already knew is that for months during the primary season while Trump was out campaigning for votes he was, at the same time, secretly negotiating to build himself a new hotel in....where?...Moscow. Yes, Moscow. He finally let it go when he saw how well he was doing with Republican voters. But, never mind the crimes Durham didn't find, that misadventure alone, when it came to light, should have been enough to cross him off anyone's list of someone to be trusted let alone elected President.
 

jack » 16 May 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 4:40 pm

Haven't been here for a few days. I assume the above has been corrected to say that Durham merely claims the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation before starting a full investigation. A nitpick of a criticism but probably the best he could come up with. I mean the guy had to do something to explain the millions he spent in three years while obtaining zero indictments (Mueller's findings led to more than two dozen indictments and eight felony convictions, five of them Trump campaign members).

What we already knew is that for months during the primary season while Trump was out campaigning for votes he was, at the same time, secretly negotiating to build himself a new hotel in....where?...Moscow. Yes, Moscow. He finally let it go when he saw how well he was doing with Republican voters. But, never mind the crimes Durham didn't find, that misadventure alone, when it came to light, should have been enough to cross him off anyone's list of someone to be trusted let alone elected President.

Keep drinking the koolaid jack.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 3:54 pm

Well in todays world RFK jr. cannot be called what runs the demrat party. Most of them would call him a RWNJ. In reality he fits in far better with Trump than AOC.

My opinion, your opinion, her opinion, his opinion and the opinion of the guy down the street.   The nice thing about opinions is that they are free of any need to be right or wrong.   

jack » 16 May 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 4:40 pm

Haven't been here for a few days. I assume the above has been corrected to say that Durham merely claims the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation before starting a full investigation. A nitpick of a criticism but probably the best he could come up with. I mean the guy had to do something to explain the millions he spent in three years while obtaining zero indictments (Mueller's findings led to more than two dozen indictments and eight felony convictions, five of them Trump campaign members).

What we already knew is that for months during the primary season while Trump was out campaigning for votes he was, at the same time, secretly negotiating to build himself a new hotel in....where?...Moscow. Yes, Moscow. He finally let it go when he saw how well he was doing with Republican voters. But, never mind the crimes Durham didn't find, that misadventure alone, when it came to light, should have been enough to cross him off anyone's list of someone to be trusted let alone elected President.

****!!! It was fake, phony, lying, made up **** about Trump colluding with the Ruskies fed to the FBI by the many titted empress' apparatchiks and they knew it was a hoax.  A hoax that was perpetuated by the corrupt, FBI and DOJ that are stooges for the dim-0-crap party against Trump for his entire term.

Trump is a business man, NOT a politician.  He did not get into politics to get rich like the rest of the corrupt politicians in DC.  He was already wealthy.  

The dim-0-crap and rinos fear him because the seehim as a threat to their power and corruption.

The many titted empress was already tweeting about Trump colluding with the ruskies before the FBI "investigation got off the ground.  Proving her and her dim-0-crap apparatchiks guilty!!!
 

The same dims that absolve senile Biden are the ones that believed the Russia hoax. These dims still believe the collusion deception. Posters who debunked the fraud against Trump now have a legit claim against the Biden crime family. Same dims say nothing there. The FBI is corrupt. The CIA is a political tool. Mentally diminished Biden wants more IRS audits to investigate YOU.

FredH » 16 May 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 1:14 pm

You are a lying Piece of ****. Why should I believe anything you put out. You squealed Russia Russia Russia spinning your dildo at the same time for years. What a total idiot.

Two words:  Sussman and Danchenko.

bend over and shove them both up your well-traveled ***

maineman » 16 May 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 6:30 pm

Two words:  Sussman and Danchenko.

bend over and shove them both up your well-traveled ***

Ladies and gentlemen...mainetool is defending the dems' Russian collusion hoax.


mm never met a hoax he didn't want to hump.     

jack » 16 May 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 4:40 pm

Haven't been here for a few days. I assume the above has been corrected to say that Durham merely claims the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation before starting a full investigation. A nitpick of a criticism but probably the best he could come up with. I mean the guy had to do something to explain the millions he spent in three years while obtaining zero indictments (Mueller's findings led to more than two dozen indictments and eight felony convictions, five of them Trump campaign members).

What we already knew is that for months during the primary season while Trump was out campaigning for votes he was, at the same time, secretly negotiating to build himself a new hotel in....where?...Moscow. Yes, Moscow. He finally let it go when he saw how well he was doing with Republican voters. But, never mind the crimes Durham didn't find, that misadventure alone, when it came to light, should have been enough to cross him off anyone's list of someone to be trusted let alone elected President.

^^^^^TYPICAL LWNJ response from someone who has NEVER READ the first sentence of the 304 page Durham report and is only capable of regurgitating the talking points given to her by her HANDLERS AND PROPAGANDISTS!!

It must really SUCK being so damn manipulated that anyone can spot your daily diatribe handed to you by those same handlers. I mean it REALLY SUCKS!!

Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 2:04 pm

Trump could bring FULLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that he wasn't even present, offer 20 witnesses that he wasn't present, show receipts he was in Scotland for a month at the time claimed he was there, complete with date stamped photos that PROVE he wasn't there, along wiht newspaper stories on him at that time showing he wasn't there when he was accused of the act, and the effing IDIOT JURY in either of those places would convict in 15 minutes just because he is Trump.

Is it possible to get any deeper in the tank than the above comment? One investigation fails to find ANY criminal conduct. The other investigation results in dozens of indictments and eight felony convictions but we're told the damning investigation is the one that came up clean. If that weren't enough we are told that
as between supporters of Biden and Trump the ones with minds of their own are those who not only support the criminally tainted candidate but the same guy who said on national television that he could shoot someone for the fun of it and not lose any of their votes. As the man said, it takes all kinds but the trouble now is far too many of one particular kind.
 

Beekeeper » 16 May 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 6:54 pm

^^^^^TYPICAL LWNJ response from someone who has NEVER READ the first sentence of the 304 page Durham report and is only capable of regurgitating the talking points given to her by her HANDLERS AND PROPAGANDISTS!!

It must really SUCK being so damn manipulated that anyone can spot your daily diatribe handed to you by those same handlers. I mean it REALLY SUCKS!!

Unintelligent members of debate sites traffic in personal insults, coherent argument being beyond them. The above reply is an example and sadly typical of the member who posted it. 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/e-ew4JtXL5I
 

jack » 16 May 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 10:31 pm

Unintelligent members of debate sites traffic in personal insults, coherent argument being beyond them. The above reply is an example and sadly typical of the member who posted it.

                 

golfboy » 15 May 2023, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2023, 7:21 pm

FBI and DoJ have to be disbanded.

"It Was Hillary Clinton Who Was Close To The Russians All Along"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up_J2ZrxXig

maineman » 16 May 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2023, 6:30 pm

Two words:  Sussman and Danchenko.

bend over and shove them both up your well-traveled ***

So and since your are so smart why not a link or two? Why were they not charged? Insiders?