Not what that antifa ****** was cryingSquatchman » 19 May 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds like trump supporters.
Except you.
You are just a run of the mill keyboard warrior.
Well you are caught up in the corruption of the DOJ and judges in Manhattan, stupid enough to believe they are legitimate and think that even if those things are true the FBI interfering and manipulating elections do not rise to those smear campaigns? You really are a mental midget.Xavier_Onassis » 16 May 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump is the lowest life scum that has ever run for president, the only one to be impeached twice, the only one that called a mob to riot in the capitol and attempt a coup, and, the only one sued for $5,000,000 when he lost a civil trial for sexual misconduct.
What other president has refused to concede when he clearly LOST, paid a pornstar for sex, then paid her over $30,000 to shut up and she still ratted him out.
Trump is the LOWEST of LOWLIFES ever!
So what are they going to do? Defund the FBI? Stop paying Wray? Until the DOJ is made right there is little that can be done.ROG62 » 16 May 2023, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Unbelievable...will be interested to see how the congressional committee handles it...
So the IRS shutting down their tax evasion investigation means nothing to you?impartialobserver » 19 May 2023, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The main reason that I can't really get into this story is the lack of biased, subjective info. Every article I read is so partisan as to make it pointless to read.
Where we differ is that I am willing to admit that I am not involved in the investigation and therefore do not have all of the information. As long as the information sounds good to you.. you treat it as untouchable gospel. I do not know enough and probably never will. If I had the laptop in my hands and had all of the case notes/details.. different story.FredH » 19 May 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ So the IRS shutting down their tax evasion investigation means nothing to you?
OK simply put, the IRS has ceased investigation into Hunter Biden's tax evasion issues. Prove otherwise. This has been widely reported.impartialobserver » 19 May 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Where we differ is that I am willing to admit that I am not involved in the investigation and therefore do not have all of the information. As long as the information sounds good to you.. you treat it as untouchable gospel. I do not know enough and probably never will. If I had the laptop in my hands and had all of the case notes/details.. different story.
I'm Shocked the left would stoop that low. Just kidding...the left IS that low.FredH » 16 May 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ The corruption reigns supreme. You leftards are lowlife scum, you celebrate lowlife scum and you vote for lowlife scum.
https://nypost.com/2023/05/15/irs-cans- ... taliatory/
Ok, Simply put... my point is not whether or not they have ceased investigation. Clear enough? My point is that I do not have enough solid, unbiased info in order to weigh in. I know that you do not have such a standard.FredH » 19 May 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ OK simply put, the IRS has ceased investigation into Hunter Biden's tax evasion issues. Prove otherwise. This has been widely reported.
darn itSquatchman » 18 May 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ No evidence.
Just Comer saying we have "something" and Johnson saying "things can be inferred".
No criminal referrals just hot airhot Just another big nothing burger for you and your ilk.
WINNING!!!!!
Read between the lines. Find the common denominator every side defends their secrets until extinction. Life hangs in the balance between all extremes as that is the instinctive clue to the subliminal philosophy of 6 degrees of separation debating 2 sided issues around a single detail that never is duplicated twice. redone all the time sure, but always separate circumstances changing the whole universe from was to is changing forward now.impartialobserver » 19 May 2023, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The main reason that I can't really get into this story is the lack of biased, subjective info. Every article I read is so partisan as to make it pointless to read.
Well jello brain the IRS stopped the investigation. Are you so dumb you can't figure out why? Impartial my ***. Leftard.impartialobserver » 19 May 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, Simply put... my point is not whether or not they have ceased investigation. Clear enough? My point is that I do not have enough solid, unbiased info in order to weigh in. I know that you do not have such a standard.
Before you blast away.. this is the reason that I never believed in the Russian Collusion story.
So you did not watch the hearings yet you still comment. Criminal referrals to the Garland DOJ? You are one stupid ***.Squatchman » 18 May 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ No evidence.
Just Comer saying we have "something" and Johnson saying "things can be inferred".
No criminal referrals just hot airhot Just another big nothing burger for you and your ilk.
WINNING!!!!!
Kinda makes you wonder how the IRS ever wins a tax fraud case, doesn't it!Squatchman » 18 May 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ No evidence.
Just Comer saying we have "something" and Johnson saying "things can be inferred".
No criminal referrals just hot airhot Just another big nothing burger for you and your ilk.
WINNING!!!!!
FredH » 22 May 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ Well jello brain the IRS stopped the investigation. Are you so dumb you can't figure out why? Impartial my ***. Leftard.
ha ha ha ha ha ha. what changes between self evident evolving and circumstantial evidence it didn't evolve as achieved to specific event? You aren't an impartial observer or you would explain how life never exceeded evolving forward now as history is facts used against each great great grandchild to follow the consensus established by previous 4 generation gaps demanding payback forward to granting privileges to believe life isn't self evident.impartialobserver » 22 May 2023, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, give me the full case file and the laptop and I will come to an informed conclusion. Getting subjective table scraps is not enough for me. Its a good thing... I assist in folks getting unemployment insurance or not. What do I use in my data analysis... raw data such hours worked, wages paid, etc. not articles from whatever news source.
FredH » 19 May 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Well you are caught up in the corruption of the DOJ and judges in Manhattan, stupid enough to believe they are legitimate and think that even if those things are true the FBI interfering and manipulating elections do not rise to those smear campaigns? You really are a mental midget.
Biological brain doesn't believe anything else is possible, but a brain giving away what they were since conceived, does mind speculation to death and destruction of their own species.peepee » 23 May 2023, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ :rofl: :clap:
...only a mental midget [and monetary ignoramus] gets worked :wah: up about the $hit-puppet antics in pro-wrasslin' and/or republicrat 'politics', mental midget... :rofl: :die:
Proof you are an idiot without the ability for independent thought.peepee » 23 May 2023, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...only a mental midget [and monetary ignoramus] gets workedup about the $hit-puppet antics in pro-wrasslin' and/or republicrat 'politics', mental midget...
![]()