you suck b.see
By jerra b
17 May 2023 8:04 am in The Water Cooler Chat Room
18 May 2023 6:25 am
18 May 2023 6:38 am
Well, if in seeing them you might, by chance, happen to read about just SOME of the women hating, misogynistic **** the GOP proposes, endorses, defends, and embraces, them maybe it'll be worthwhile.
18 May 2023 6:41 am
B.See » 18 May 2023, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if in seeing them you might, by chance, happen to read about just SOME of the women hating, misogynistic **** the GOP proposes, endorses, defends, and embraces, them maybe it'll be worthwhile.
STFU YOU CHINK COCKSUCKER
18 May 2023 6:42 am
Later- i have to sober up.B.See » 18 May 2023, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if in seeing them you might, by chance, happen to read about just SOME of the women hating, misogynistic **** the GOP proposes, endorses, defends, and embraces, them maybe it'll be worthwhile.
I'm kidding you know.
18 May 2023 6:49 am
Your mind never gives up what others choose to believe and you will never give in to what an instinctive brain understands about evolving in plain sight.B.See » 18 May 2023, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if in seeing them you might, by chance, happen to read about just SOME of the women hating, misogynistic **** the GOP proposes, endorses, defends, and embraces, them maybe it'll be worthwhile.
Not even your own brain. See what separates a royal we from a loyal us capitalizing off of an obedient they, them, those people willing to compromise with deniers to just get along adapting to the moment here.
Such easy prey until abused enough, long enough.
18 May 2023 7:12 am
You think I am going to post porn? I do not roll that way. Eventually someone (like a moderator) will figure it out and BAN YOU!B.See » 18 May 2023, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ Show me where I've said anything anywhere about what anyone should be able to wear to work, asshole. You've put words into my mouth, resorted to insults in my thread, then came here to post pieces of what I said to you here in your bitch thread. You're a dishonest piece of ****.
No YOU'RE the ******, chump. Still waiting for that headline you claim brought you to a porn site, bitch. You're a fkng LIAR, which is exactly WHY I banned you from all those threads, so go **** yourself. And since your pal insists on continuing to put words in my mouth his bitch thread, I'll do the same for him.
You posted ANIMAL PORN @murdock is on a farm having his way with a DONKEY and the poor animal is humiliated and chickens and pigs are watching in horror.
18 May 2023 7:26 am
Being the whiny little radical leftist bitch that you are doesn't help!B.See » 17 May 2023, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I tried treating both Pom and jerra b with respect in my pg threads and having done so, both turned on me in a deliberate attempt to malign and discredit me.
When POM appeared in my threads telling me my links didn't work, I explained to him that I've been banned from posting links, images, and even new threads.
According to Redheaded Stranger (another staunch defender of a lot of hateful **** herein), that was because I use pg threads, arguing that I essentially "banned myself."
However that fails to explain why other liberals in the "liberal" forum have also been banned from posting links and such.
In spite of my explaination to POM and my trying to assist him by telling him how to find the headlines I post, he returned to the threads, saying "the links don't work" and further stating that he would not be cutting and pasting (I guess he meant copy and pasting) the headlines to find the sources as I suggested.
Then after that, he showed up again fraudulently claiming a headline he allegedly copied and pasted took him to a porn site. He never indicated exactly which headline.
Clearly it was a deliberate lie, and for his attempt to malign me by falsely claiming my links led to porn, I banned him from all my pg threads.
Jerra b and I engaged in on topic exchanges in at least one thread, without incident for quite some time, until, having failed to gain the upper hand, he decided to deliberately misrepresent my position with straw man argumentation, compounded with what he admitted were intended insults.
He argued that I supported men teaching kindergarten in dresses and high heels. This in SPITE of the fact that I'd already made clear to him, in prior responses, that I was neither on board with transgenders in women's sports, or drag story time.
And to add insult, he repeatedly referred to me as "darling" and when I told him I considered it a personal attack (insult) he confirmed it was INTENDED as such.
For this, he was banned from that thread.
Bottom line. There is no meeting halfway with these sorts. I tried to welcome them and engage with them, but they clearly regard attempts at civil discourse as a weakness, and they responded with contempt.
So **** em.
Those of us who you ban are quite content now that we miss your idiotic liberal drivel that goes on ad nauseum.
18 May 2023 7:56 am
18 May 2023 10:14 am
B.See » 18 May 2023, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ Show me where I've said anything anywhere about what anyone should be able to wear to work, asshole. You've put words into my mouth, resorted to insults in my thread, then came here to post pieces of what I said to you here in your bitch thread. You're a dishonest piece of ****.
No YOU'RE the ******, chump. Still waiting for that headline you claim brought you to a porn site, bitch. You're a fkng LIAR, which is exactly WHY I banned you from all those threads, so go **** yourself. And since your pal insists on continuing to put words in my mouth his bitch thread, I'll do the same for him.
you banned me from your thread! and you said men should be able to wear dresses to work spaces. but since you banned me I can't prove that you said it.
you cheat.
19 May 2023 2:44 am
No one else would be able to find it either. Because IT DOESN'T EXIST. And your continued insistence on it only causes me to wonder why I EVER wasted time trying to entertain you and engage in dialogue with you.jerrab » 18 May 2023, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ you banned me from your thread! and you said men should be able to wear dresses to work spaces. but since you banned me I can't prove that you said it.
you cheat.
You're just as **** as the rest of the magats. And all you've done is proven ONCE AGAIN, why trying to exchange points of view with those of your ilk is a fkng useless effort. So, GFY, "darling."
19 May 2023 2:48 am
****... You could've pm'd mePOM » 18 May 2023, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ You think I am going to post porn? I do not roll that way. Eventually someone (like a moderator) will figure it out and BAN YOU!
You posted ANIMAL PORN @murdock is on a farm having his way with a DONKEY and the poor animal is humiliated and chickens and pigs are watching in horror.
sometimes the sheer IGNORANCE behind some lies is absolutely astounding. For example YOUR IGNORANT claim that a headline I posted led to some porn site.
First of all, they're just titles of headlines. There are NO links embedded in them because I cannot post links.
And if there WAS a link embedded in any of them, I didn't put it there. That'd be the work of some underhanded s.o.b. who has the capability of doing **** like that because, for the upteenth time, I CAN'T POST LINKS.
The headlines are from stories found on ONLINE NEWS SOURCES. NOT porn. What's more I give the name of the source. To find the story, You'd have to copy and paste the headline, including the name of the news source, into a search engine.
Which in turn will bring up items related to the search parameters, after which it's up to you to find the correct one.
So if you ignore all the obvious matches and, say, go LOOKING FOR A PORN SITE, then that's on YOU, BUBBA.
19 May 2023 6:01 am
19 May 2023 9:01 am
B.See » 19 May 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑ No one else would be able to find it either. Because IT DOESN'T EXIST. And your continued insistence on it only causes me to wonder why I EVER wasted time trying to entertain you and engage in dialogue with you.
You're just as **** as the rest of the magats. And all you've done is proven ONCE AGAIN, why trying to exchange points of view with those of your ilk is a fkng useless effort. So, GFY, "darling."
****. I saw it. you banned me and say it was not there. plus you can delete it too. you are just pissed because I saw thru your scheme. pass laws to let trans wear dresses to work places and then claim class rooms are work spaces.
19 May 2023 9:47 am
Yeah, go ahead and act like you give a **** about "exchanging points of view", you lying scumbag!B.See » 19 May 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑ No one else would be able to find it either. Because IT DOESN'T EXIST. And your continued insistence on it only causes me to wonder why I EVER wasted time trying to entertain you and engage in dialogue with you.
You're just as **** as the rest of the magats. And all you've done is proven ONCE AGAIN, why trying to exchange points of view with those of your ilk is a fkng useless effort. So, GFY, "darling."
If that were true, you wouldn't ban anyone who would DARE to respond to YOUR OWN IDIOT THREAD that asks why people DON'T support Republicans while claiming they have "cruel and retrogressive mentalities" in your own moronic opinion!
You simply can't handle getting smacked upside your stupid head in response to foolish your posts, which is exactly what **** like you both deserve and are so afraid of!
All you want is an affirmation of your own deeply warped TDS psychosis, and you can't stand not getting it!
19 May 2023 9:53 am
B.See » 19 May 2023, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑ No one else would be able to find it either. Because IT DOESN'T EXIST. And your continued insistence on it only causes me to wonder why I EVER wasted time trying to entertain you and engage in dialogue with you.
You're just as **** as the rest of the magats. And all you've done is proven ONCE AGAIN, why trying to exchange points of view with those of your ilk is a fkng useless effort. So, GFY, "darling."
you also got pissed when I said biden changing title 9 to let men play in women's sports is the real war on women.
20 May 2023 8:25 am
I've come to the conclusion that maybe you're just a psycho who only sees what he wants to see and conjures up all the rest. Typical maga ratfukery.jerrab » 19 May 2023, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ you also got pissed when I said biden changing title 9 to let men play in women's sports is the real war on women.
I didn't erase ****, champ. Besides the posts show if they were edited and when. It was never there.
And no I didn't get "pissed" when you said "biden changing title 9 to let men play in women's sports is the real war on women" because that's not exactly what you said.
You said, "the real war against women is changing title ix to include men and boys"
To which I replied, "So, your argument is that Title IX's inclusion of protections for gender and sexual identity is somehow discriminatory to WOMEN?? Ridiculous, imo."
I said that because, though I find it interesting that a supporter of maga ideology is here quoting Title IX, an addendum to The Civil Rights Act, you seem not to know it's not just about sports. It's about protection in ALL areas of education, INCLUDING from things like ASSAULT from rapists, PREDATORS, and ****** grabbing bstrds like your DJT.
And Biden acted to restore that which was in Title IX before Trump removed it.
With regard to sports however, you wrote this around April twenty-something:
"the democrat war on women, letting boys compete against girls, among other things"
To which I responded with this:
"Frankly, I'm not on board with that either. But like drag queen story-time (something else I don't get) the MAGA right seizes on these kinds of soft targets to justify outright and wholesale discrimination against gays, minorities, women, voting rights, etc. etc."
(see: "The Continuous Republican Assault Upon the Rights of Women, Minorities, Immigrants, and the LGBTQ Community")
Which AGAIN is PROOF that you're an outright LIAR who's here to put words in my mouth and deliberately misrepresent what I've said.
Now, don't you feel like a fool for outing you OWN deception?
20 May 2023 8:28 am
Your rational logic explains how you get to conclusions smaller than how living happens in plain sight.B.See » 20 May 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ I've come to the conclusion that maybe you're just a psycho who only sees what he wants to see and conjures up all the rest. Typical maga ratfukery. I didn't erase ****, champ. Besides the posts show if they were edited and when. It was never there. And no I didn't get "pissed" when you said "biden changing title 9 to let men play in women's sports is the real war on women" because that's not exactly what you said. You said, "the real war against women is changing title ix to include men and boys" To which I replied, "So, your argument is that Title IX's inclusion of protections for gender and sexual identity is somehow discriminatory to WOMEN?? Ridiculous, imo." I said that because, though I find it interesting that a supporter of maga ideology is here quoting Title IX, an addendum to The Civil Rights Act, you seem not to know it's not just about sports. It's about protection in ALL areas of education, INCLUDING from things like ASSAULT from rapists, PREDATORS, and ****** grabbing bstrds like your DJT. And Biden acted to restore that which was in Title IX before Trump removed it. With regard to sports however, you wrote this around April twenty-something: "the democrat war on women, letting boys compete against girls, among other things" To which I responded with this: "Frankly, I'm not on board with that either. But like drag queen story-time (something else I don't get) the MAGA right seizes on these kinds of soft targets to justify outright and wholesale discrimination against gays, minorities, women, voting rights, etc. etc." (see: "The Continuous Republican Assault Upon the Rights of Women, Minorities, Immigrants, and the LGBTQ Community") Which is PROOF that you're and outright LIAR who's here to put words in my mouth and deliberately misrepresent what I've said. Now, don't you feel like a fool for outing you OWN deception?
20 May 2023 9:08 am
I’d love a bjjerrab » 17 May 2023, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ copied from b see----
I haven't insisted on men or women wearing anything in particular, to teach at any grade level.
That's just more of the typical MAGA false flag tactic. to put words in other people's mouths, while THEY excuse, defend, and or ignore MANY issues like those posted herein,
including the MAGA/GOP AFFRONT upon women's reproductive rights, the hate based attacks, discrimination, and demonization of the LGBTQ community, the MAGA attack upon immigrants (of colour),
------------------------------------------
you insist that they be allowed to wear dresses and high heels to teach kindergarten and any work space.
you don't like my honesty so you ban from your thread. you suck.
20 May 2023 9:33 am
So, let me try to comprehend your ignorance.B.See » 20 May 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑
I've come to the conclusion that maybe you're just a psycho who only sees what he wants to see and conjures up all the rest. Typical maga ratfukery.
I didn't erase ****, champ. Besides the posts show if they were edited and when. It was never there.
And no I didn't get "pissed" when you said "biden changing title 9 to let men play in women's sports is the real war on women" because that's not exactly what you said.
You said, "the real war against women is changing title ix to include men and boys"
To which I replied, "So, your argument is that Title IX's inclusion of protections for gender and sexual identity is somehow discriminatory to WOMEN?? Ridiculous, imo."
I said that because, though I find it interesting that a supporter of maga ideology is here quoting Title IX, an addendum to The Civil Rights Act, you seem not to know it's not just about sports. It's about protection in ALL areas of education, INCLUDING from things like ASSAULT from rapists, PREDATORS, and ****** grabbing bstrds like your DJT.
And Biden acted to restore that which was in Title IX before Trump removed it.
With regard to sports however, you wrote this around April twenty-something:
"the democrat war on women, letting boys compete against girls, among other things"
To which I responded with this:
"Frankly, I'm not on board with that either. But like drag queen story-time (something else I don't get) the MAGA right seizes on these kinds of soft targets to justify outright and wholesale discrimination against gays, minorities, women, voting rights, etc. etc."
(see: "The Continuous Republican Assault Upon the Rights of Women, Minorities, Immigrants, and the LGBTQ Community")
Which AGAIN is PROOF that you're an outright LIAR who's here to put words in my mouth and deliberately misrepresent what I've said.
Now, don't you feel like a fool for outing you OWN deception?
You thought crimes like assault and rape weren't illegal before Title 9?
20 May 2023 11:20 am
no one's been banned from posting links, etc while still being able to post regular stuff... let's see what @Cannonpointer has to say about that...if not true be blind, quit being a karen...B.See » 17 May 2023, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I tried treating both Pom and jerra b with respect in my pg threads and having done so, both turned on me in a deliberate attempt to malign and discredit me.
When POM appeared in my threads telling me my links didn't work, I explained to him that I've been banned from posting links, images, and even new threads.
According to Redheaded Stranger (another staunch defender of a lot of hateful **** herein), that was because I use pg threads, arguing that I essentially "banned myself."
However that fails to explain why other liberals in the "liberal" forum have also been banned from posting links and such.
In spite of my explaination to POM and my trying to assist him by telling him how to find the headlines I post, he returned to the threads, saying "the links don't work" and further stating that he would not be cutting and pasting (I guess he meant copy and pasting) the headlines to find the sources as I suggested.
Then after that, he showed up again fraudulently claiming a headline he allegedly copied and pasted took him to a porn site. He never indicated exactly which headline.
Clearly it was a deliberate lie, and for his attempt to malign me by falsely claiming my links led to porn, I banned him from all my pg threads.
Jerra b and I engaged in on topic exchanges in at least one thread, without incident for quite some time, until, having failed to gain the upper hand, he decided to deliberately misrepresent my position with straw man argumentation, compounded with what he admitted were intended insults.
He argued that I supported men teaching kindergarten in dresses and high heels. This in SPITE of the fact that I'd already made clear to him, in prior responses, that I was neither on board with transgenders in women's sports, or drag story time.
And to add insult, he repeatedly referred to me as "darling" and when I told him I considered it a personal attack (insult) he confirmed it was INTENDED as such.
For this, he was banned from that thread.
Bottom line. There is no meeting halfway with these sorts. I tried to welcome them and engage with them, but they clearly regard attempts at civil discourse as a weakness, and they responded with contempt.
So **** em.
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
Who is online
In total there are 2101 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 2074 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, jerra b, SouthernFried, *GHETTO BLASTER, Mrkelly, nefarious101, Two If By Tea, Deezer Shoove, Cannonpointer, LowIQTrash, Vegas, murdock
Bots: ALittle Client, curl/7, Yahoo! Slurp, DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, app.hypefactors.com, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, bingbot