Liberal Forum

Thank God

for the rise of China and Russia

golfboy » 06 Jun 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:09 pm

You have no idea what happened there, that day.
The protesters were peaceful, and the police started shooting tear gas and flash bangs into the crowd.
https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/stat ... 6806706188

Jack Poso on Twitter: "Fairly certain this is the flash bang @RaheemKassam and I heard walking past Russell at 1:15pm on Constitution Ave https://t.co/fjLIGpeIFh" / Twitter

****.

they came prepared to attack the police.

jerrab » 06 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm

****.

they came prepared to attack the police.

The globalist controlled police??

impartialobserver » 06 Jun 2023, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 7:30 pm

January 6.. interesting topic except that it has been 2 years and 4 months roughly. The ability of folks to keep rehashing things is simply amazing.

then don't post,

Sumela » 06 Jun 2023, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:32 pm

The globalist controlled police??

the police to protect the capitol.
 

jerrab » 06 Jun 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:35 pm

the police to protect the capitol.

the police that followed Pelosi's orders to allow this to happen

FJB » 07 Jun 2023, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 6:33 am

the police that followed Pelosi's orders to allow this to happen

sicknick was a trump supporter so that shoots down your lie.
 

jerrab » 07 Jun 2023, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 6:51 am

sicknick was a trump supporter so that shoots down your lie.

I said Pelosi, you really have a comprehension problem. 

maineman » 06 Jun 2023, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:15 pm

I lost NO argument with you, moron.  Ashli was filmed climbing through a broken window when she got what was coming to her.

lol.  You lose EVERY argument, Room Temp.

 

jerrab » 06 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm

****.

they came prepared to attack the police.

lol.  with flagpoles, right?    
These are the same people who own all the guns in America, and they didn't bring them?  Why not?

The video shows the protesters were peaceful, and the cops started firing flashbangs, teargas and rubber bullets into the crowd BEHIND the people AT the barriers, which of course will force people to move in all directions away from where the projectiles were landing. 

The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence. 
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath.  But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either. 
 

golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am

lol.  with flagpoles, right?    
These are the same people who own all the guns in America, and they didn't bring them?  Why not?

The video shows the protesters were peaceful, and the cops started firing flashbangs, teargas and rubber bullets into the crowd BEHIND the people AT the barriers, which of course will force people to move in all directions away from where the projectiles were landing. 

The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence. 
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath.  But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either.

So you are saying that the police have admitted in court, under oath that they initiated the violence and had people in the crowd agitating violence?

Do you have a link that would substantiate that claim?

maineman » 06 Jun 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 8:38 pm

do you just make up ****?  I am not afraid of little girls.  I certainly am not concerned about an LEO putting a bullet into some stupid insurrectionist's head dumb enough to break through a barrier guarded by that armed LEO.  Stupid MAGA **** got EXACTLY what she deserved

A leftist's sense of justice is interesting. Certainly fungible.

FJB » 07 Jun 2023, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 7:03 am

I said Pelosi, you really have a comprehension problem.

you have a problem/  it is called hating truth.

get help.

golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am

lol.  with flagpoles, right?    
These are the same people who own all the guns in America, and they didn't bring them?  Why not?

The video shows the protesters were peaceful, and the cops started firing flashbangs, teargas and rubber bullets into the crowd BEHIND the people AT the barriers, which of course will force people to move in all directions away from where the projectiles were landing. 

The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence. 
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath.  But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either.

they CAME with bear spray and flag poles.

why?
 

neueregel » 07 Jun 2023, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:20 am

A leftist's sense of justice is interesting. Certainly fungible.

Do you believe that Ashli was within her rights to break through the barrier window inside the Capitol even after Officer Byrd, with his weapon drawn, had ordered her to stand down?   A simple yes or no will suffice, please.

jerrab » 06 Jun 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2023, 10:35 pm

the police to protect the capitol.

All those crazy vids showing the police

just letting folks in peacefully.  So odd.

golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:10 am

lol.  with flagpoles, right?    
These are the same people who own all the guns in America, and they didn't bring them?  Why not?

The video shows the protesters were peaceful, and the cops started firing flashbangs, teargas and rubber bullets into the crowd BEHIND the people AT the barriers, which of course will force people to move in all directions away from where the projectiles were landing. 

The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence. 
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath.  But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either.

what, no  link to the testimony?

 

maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:31 am

Do you believe that Ashli was within her rights to break through the barrier window inside the Capitol even after Officer Byrd, with his weapon drawn, had ordered her to stand down?   A simple yes or no will suffice, please.

Do I accept an officer has the right to use deadly force on someone trespassing? No. And neither does he or he would have shot more than one person entering through the window.

That being said, I don't understand anyone's need to enter through a window when the cops were holding the door open.  

neueregel » 07 Jun 2023, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:42 am

Do I accept an officer has the right to use deadly force on someone trespassing? No. And neither does he or he would have shot more than one person entering through the window.

That being said, I don't understand anyone's need to enter through a window when the cops were holding the door open.

why can't you just answer a simple yes or no?
Byrd didn't need to shoot more than one.  The crowd got the message after the first one.

And Ashli was not simply trespassing.  She was part of a lynch mob trespassing with the intent to do bodily harm to the Vice President.

And some Capitol police may very well have held doors open after it became apparent that they were totally outnumbered and overwhelmed, but Officer Byrd stood his post behind a locked door and barrier and didn't hold anything open for anyone.

 

maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jun 2023, 8:46 am

why can't you just answer a simple yes or no?
Byrd didn't need to shoot more than one.  The crowd got the message after the first one.

And Ashli was not simply trespassing.  She was part of a lynch mob trespassing with the intent to do bodily harm to the Vice President.

And some Capitol police may very well have held doors open after it became apparent that they were totally outnumbered and overwhelmed, but Officer Byrd stood his post behind a locked door and barrier and didn't hold anything open for anyone.

He was able to ascertain the intent of this woman coming through the window? That's a stretch.

Now we've settled on the fact shooting the woman didn't deter the mob and the cops just threw in the towel and held open the doors? That makes the shooting less senseless than it was before.