Many... that's why we don't have a **** liberal problem in these partsmaineman » 07 Jun 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ love those prognostications. Can you tell us the last time one of yours came to pass?
![]()
![]()
do you know what the word, "prognostication" means?FJB » 07 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Many... that's why we don't have a **** liberal problem in these parts
You mean like when Bobby Three Sticks was gonna sink Trump?maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ love those prognostications. Can you tell us the last time one of yours came to pass?
![]()
![]()
so you don't?
oh heck...I'll tell you... it is kinda like a PREDICTION.
And someone who was not illiterate would realize that the correct phrase is "your family IS all retarded". But you're an illiterate redneck, inbred, homosexual son of a crack whore so, you're not knowing that is not really a big surprise.
You are thinking of your daughtermaineman » 07 Jun 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ And someone who was not illiterate would realize that the correct phrase is "your family IS all retarded". But you're an illiterate redneck, inbred, homosexual son of a crack whore so, you're not knowing that is not really a big surprise.
one can always recognize someone hypnotized by fox news.
My daughter is not an illiterate, she's not a redneck, not inbred, not homosexual, and certainly not the son of anyone. You understand, do you not, that sons and daughters are mutually exclusive. I mean, seriously, every time I think you have shown me the depth of your ignorance, you somehow get below that low bar yet again. Amazing.
To defend themselves from liberals who clearly would embed themselves to cause trouble.
Nah, she's just a racist bitch who said in court the black men are too ignorant to serve on juries.maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ My daughter is not an illiterate, she's not a redneck, not inbred, not homosexual, and certainly not the son of anyone. You understand, do you not, that sons and daughters are mutually exclusive. I mean, seriously, every time I think you have shown me the depth of your ignorance, you somehow get below that low bar yet again. Amazing.
Not what I said. Why do you lie, Room Temp?maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ So you are saying that the police have admitted in court, under oath that they initiated the violence and had people in the crowd agitating violence?
Do you have a link that would substantiate that claim?
I provided video that literally shows the peaceful protesters being attacked by the police, which STARTED the rioting.jerrab » 06 Jun 2023, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ the police were attacked from the first. the insurrectionist brought bear spray and flag poles with them to attack the police,
golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I provided video that literally shows the peaceful protesters being attacked by the police, which STARTED the rioting.
It's sad you are so willfully ignorant that you ignore proof even when your nose is rubbed in it,
Please produce proof of your claims.jerrab » 07 Jun 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ ****
they brought bear spray and flag poles with them to beat up the police.
what did you say that was different?