Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Capital Police started J6 Riot!
Capital Police started J6 Riot!
By FredH
17 May 2023 10:27 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Jun 2023 7:07 pm
So... you got nothing. What a surprise.
8 Jun 2023 7:08 pm
Did you not watch the video I posted?jerrab » 07 Jun 2023, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ where is the proof that a big bang frightened the widdle insurrectionists into frenzied maniacs?
where did they say that?
What more do you need?
8 Jun 2023 7:09 pm
Every time you "paraphrase" anything I say, you do so because you're lying.maineman » 07 Jun 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ actually, let's cut to the chase... what about my paraphrasing of your words was materially inaccurate?
Just quote me, like I do you.
It's always hilarious when I quote you, and you claim I'm lying.
8 Jun 2023 7:11 pm
If they intended to attack the police, why did they leave all their weapons behind when they went to D.C.?jerrab » 07 Jun 2023, 10:03 pm » wrote: ↑ -----------------------------------------------------
https://www.npr.org/2022/04/29/10955380 ... jan-6-riot
Ulrich is one of 11 Oath Keepers, including the group's founder Stewart Rhodes, to be charged with seditious conspiracy and other crimes for allegedly plotting to use force to prevent Congress' Jan. 6 certification of President Biden's election win.LAWOath Keepers face seditious conspiracy charges. DOJ has mixed record with such casesNow, five months before the case is set to go trial, prosecutors have secured the cooperation of two members of the alleged conspiracy to help build their prosecution against the remaining defendants."Did you do that sir, agree with Mr. Rhodes and develop a plan to stop the lawful transfer of presidential power by Jan. 20, 2021?" Judge Amit Mehta asked at Friday's hearing."Yes, your honor," Ulrich replied.
8 Jun 2023 7:12 pm
Was the suggestion to ferry weapons done by one of the Feds who were embeded with the Proud Boys?jerrab » 07 Jun 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ ------------------------------------------------------------
https://apnews.com/article/stewart-rhod ... f77215a110
The indictment alleges Oath Keepers for weeks discussed trying to overturn the election results and preparing for a siege by purchasing weapons and setting up battle plans. They repeatedly wrote in chats about the prospect of violence and the need, as Rhodes allegedly wrote in one text, “to scare the s—-out of” Congress. And on Jan. 6, the indictment alleges, they entered the Capitol building with the large crowds of rioters who stormed past police barriers and smashed windows, injuring dozens of officers and sending lawmakers running.Authorities have said the Oath Keepers and their associates worked as if they were going to war, discussing weapons and training. Days before the attack, one defendant suggested in a text message getting a boat to ferry weapons across the Potomac River to their “waiting arms,” prosecutors say.
8 Jun 2023 7:18 pm
"The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Every time you "paraphrase" anything I say, you do so because you're lying.
Just quote me, like I do you.
It's always hilarious when I quote you, and you claim I'm lying.
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath. But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either."
link?
8 Jun 2023 7:24 pm
was it? Got any proof to back THAT up?golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Was the suggestion to ferry weapons done by one of the Feds who were embeded with the Proud Boys?
another link, maybe??
8 Jun 2023 7:25 pm
lol. The videos I posted show the police attacking the protesters while NOTHING was going on.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ "The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath. But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either."
link?
It's sad you don't read.
8 Jun 2023 7:25 pm
It was a question, not a claim, *******.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ was it? Got any proof to back THAT up?
another link, maybe??
8 Jun 2023 7:55 pm
You said:golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ lol. The videos I posted show the police attacking the protesters while NOTHING was going on.
It's sad you don't read.
"The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath. But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either."
Nothing in your link shows that the police admitted, under oath, that they initiated the violence, or that the feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
8 Jun 2023 7:59 pm
The police did initiate the violence. I proved that with video of the event.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ You said:
"The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
The police have admitted this in testimony in court, under oath. But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either."
Nothing in your link shows that the police admitted, under oath, that they initiated the violence, or that the feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
And they feds have admitted in court, that they had dozens of people in the crowd, and they were agitating violence.
8 Jun 2023 8:10 pm
if the feds admitted that they agitated violence, you should be able to provide a link that documents that.golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ The police did initiate the violence. I proved that with video of the event.
And they feds have admitted in court, that they had dozens of people in the crowd, and they were agitating violence.
you said that the police admitted under oath that they initiated the violence.
You said:
"The police initiated the violence, and feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
The police have admitted THIS in testimony in court, under oath. But I'm sure you aren't aware of that either."
Nothing in your link shows that the police admitted, under oath, that they initiated the violence, or that the feds had people in the crowd agitating violence.
8 Jun 2023 8:16 pm
8 Jun 2023 8:19 pm
golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you not watch the video I posted?
What more do you need?
I posted proof they planned to use force, only an idiot like you can't read.
and no where did they say a big bang caused them to do anything.
so much for your big bang theory.
8 Jun 2023 8:22 pm
golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ If they intended to attack the police, why did they leave all their weapons behind when they went to D.C.?
dumb ***
they brought weapons and they used them.
8 Jun 2023 8:32 pm
Wierd. The FBI says you're a liar:
FBI Official Says No Guns Were Recovered During Capitol Riot Arrests
8 Jun 2023 8:32 pm
And yet they left all their weapons behind.jerrab » 08 Jun 2023, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I posted proof they planned to use force, only an idiot like you can't read.
and no where did they say a big bang caused them to do anything.
so much for your big bang theory.
8 Jun 2023 8:33 pm
It's not my fault you're ignorant.maineman » 08 Jun 2023, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ @golfboy
more word soup, you poor little retarded pedo???
I've done everything I can to educate you, but like your 3rd grade teacher, I failed.
8 Jun 2023 9:21 pm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------golfboy » 08 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Wierd. The FBI says you're a liar:
FBI Official Says No Guns Were Recovered During Capitol Riot Arrests
What is the full meaning of weapon?
weap·on. ˈwep-ən. : something (as a gun, knife, or club) used to injure, defeat, or destroy. : something with which one fights or struggles against another.Apr 26, 2023
8 Jun 2023 9:24 pm
It's amusing that the most heavily armed Americans didn't bring any weapons to D.C., isn't it?jerrab » 08 Jun 2023, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the full meaning of weapon?
weap·on. ˈwep-ən. : something (as a gun, knife, or club) used to injure, defeat, or destroy. : something with which one fights or struggles against another.Apr 26, 2023
Who is online
In total there are 2369 users online :: 22 registered, 20 bots, and 2327 guests
Registered users: *Beekeeper, roadkill, LowIQTrash, michaelf, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, Johnny You, murdock, *GHETTO BLASTER, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, Cannonpointer, Buck Naked, Blackvegetable, Fuelman, NEILCAR, Mrkelly, RebelGator, MR-7, *Huey, 31st Arrival, ROG62
Bots: CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, MicroMessenger, Not, Pinterest, DuckDuckBot, app.hypefactors.com, DuckDuckGo, Mojeek, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, Applebot, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, curl/7, YandexBot, GPTBot, bingbot, Googlebot