Liberal Forum

Xavier_Onassis » 19 May 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:53 am

This is NOT what is meant by "six degrees of separation", it is a newspaper puzzle without the clues.

Who decides what it means for everyone? Mob rule, dictatorships, democracy, genetic outcomes only occupying time specifically here now? Oops I only listed 4.
make the other two male and female.

Xavier_Onassis » 19 May 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:53 am

This is NOT what is meant by "six degrees of separation", it is a newspaper puzzle without the clues.

you know what would be big fun? OMH verses Rhiney. ssshhhh      
 

sooted up Cyndi » 19 May 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:57 am

you know what would be big fun? OMH verses Rhiney. ssshhhh :lol:   :lol:   :lol:  
 

who?

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:01 am

who?

oh somebody we know. has an odd way of talking. Nice guy.....
By the way. Have you talked to that chat bot yet? Why don't you. See if you can fry its circuits. JUST think- if you could- you would be FAMOUS!   
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 May 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:53 am

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:41 am

list the 6 degrees of separation for an intellectual mind enabled to believe nobody can know and unable to understand how they arrived to living here now?

1. Academia
2. Arts
3. Economics
4. Religion
5. Politics
6. Consensus

This is NOT what is meant by "six degrees of separation", it is a newspaper puzzle without the clues.

6 methods of psychological class warfare socially induced in every society training each arriving great great grandchild to regret being born one at a time now.

then they start blaming all previous generations and siblings for life never going as designed by rule of law. And every next generation of great great grandchildren repeats the manifested destiny of saving humanity protecting tomorrows.

I understand why corruption doesn't end by the will of "we the people believe...".

Xavier_Onassis » 19 May 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 8:33 am

There is no likelihood that omh is an agent of any government.
The one fact we see here is evidence that he craves attention

And, I would further add to what you said here with his style of writing is not really conducive to flushing out would-be bad guys. However, if flushing out would-be bad guys is not the goal, his ability to stay on script is worth considering.
 

Skans » 19 May 2023, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:13 am

And, I would further add to what you said here with his style of writing is not really conducive to flushing out would-be bad guys. However, if flushing out would-be bad guys is not the goal, his ability to stay on script is worth considering.
 

the simplicity of accurate and incomplete. You cannot debate in that field since you defend reasonable doubt statistically averaging total sum past against each person evolving forward one at a time.

life evil. Devil lived in details of maybes and promised tomorrows. bad idea or evil practice throughout history recording human behavior ignoring genetics maintains eternal separation of current population.

sooted up Cyndi » 19 May 2023, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:03 am

oh somebody we know. has an odd way of talking. Nice guy.....
By the way. Have you talked to that chat bot yet? Why don't you. See if you can fry its circuits. JUST think- if you could- you would be FAMOUS!  :wave:  
 

You suggesting the current VP?

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:17 am

the simplicity of accurate and incomplete. You cannot debate in that field since you defend reasonable doubt statistically averaging total sum past against each person evolving forward one at a time.

life evil. Devil lived in details of maybes and promised tomorrows. bad idea or evil practice throughout history recording human behavior ignoring genetics maintains eternal separation of current population.

Gibberish - when you can't even start a sentence with a capital letter or include a verb in a supposed sentence, then you have no message to convey to others.  That, my nutty little friend is "gibberish". 
 

Skans » 19 May 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:32 am

Gibberish - when you can't even start a sentence with a capital letter or include a verb in a supposed sentence, then you have no message to convey to others.  That, my nutty little friend is "gibberish". 
 

the constant intellectual down playing instinctive brain using intellectual context controlling tomorrows only arriving today by rule of law.

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:21 am

You suggesting the current VP?

No the ai chat bot.
 

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:35 am

the constant intellectual down playing instinctive brain using intellectual context controlling tomorrows only arriving today by rule of law.

More gibberish.  Why?  Because this supposed "sentence" has no discernible subject or predicate.  Before numb-nuts says something stupid like "playing, using, ariving" are all verbs,  I caution him to refrain, because a verb must agree in person and number with its subject, regardless of other elements in a sentence. 

Therefore, because this is not so, what was written is GIBBERISH.  Unintelligible gibberish.  Anyone who convinces themselves they understand what Omh wrote is wrong, because Omh actually did not write anything of any meaning whatsoever.

 
 

sooted up Cyndi » 19 May 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:37 am

No the ai chat bot.
 

Elon Musk?

Skans » 19 May 2023, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:40 am

More gibberish.  Why?  Because this supposed "sentence" has no discernible subject or predicate.  Before numb-nuts says something stupid like "playing, using, ariving" are all verbs,  I caution him to refrain, because a verb must agree in person and number with its subject, regardless of other elements in a sentence. 

Therefore, because this is not so, what was written is GIBBERISH.  Unintelligible gibberish.  Anyone who convinces themselves they understand what Omh wrote is wrong, because Omh actually did not write anything of any meaning whatsoever.

 
 

Now you want to bounce between subjective truths to gain objective goals to saving reasonable doubt forward here.

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 9:41 am

Elon Musk?
 

No, this one.. I wanted to try it but I'm not going to give an AI my email adress, I've seen the movies... oh, don't worry, it's ok to use, I clicked on that too, they say it's safe...

 


 

Jantje_Smit » 19 May 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 10:03 am

No, this one.. I wanted to try it but I'm not going to give an AI my email adress, I've seen the movies... oh, don't worry, it's ok to use, I clicked on that too, they say it's safe...

:faint:  


 

why go to an ai bot when people staying in character do the same thing here.

Jantje_Smit » 19 May 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 10:03 am

No, this one.. I wanted to try it but I'm not going to give an AI my email adress, I've seen the movies... oh, don't worry, it's ok to use, I clicked on that too, they say it's safe...

 

I was curious about this.  I'd like to try ChatGPT too, but don't want to give them even any of my fake email accounts,
 

Skans » 19 May 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 10:08 am

I was curious about this.  I'd like to try ChatGPT too, but don't want to give them even any of my fake email accounts,
 

The concept doesn't even interest me. talking to an AI bot there is no chance to spark instinctive awareness laying dormant for decades.

Nostradamus'omh » 19 May 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 10:12 am

The concept doesn't even interest me. talking to an AI bot there is no chance to spark instinctive awareness laying dormant for decades.

You don't know that, it's an AI and it's learning... time works different for computers, seconds can be decades.. maybe you can spark its self awareness and instincs.. or fry its circuits and prevent that from happening.. that would be even better, you could save the world... it would be fun to watch either way...

 


 
 

Jantje_Smit » 19 May 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 May 2023, 10:37 am

You don't know that, it's an AI and it's learning... time works different for computers, seconds can be decades.. maybe you can spark its self awareness and instincs.. or fry its circuits and prevent that from happening.. that would be even better, you could save the world... it would be fun to watch either way...

:blink:  


 
 

It is learning like a brain learns to mind commands in context over content defined by relative time logistics, not adapting in the moment. Shame on humanity if AI does it third since humanity was humans ignoring life in real time first, second inventing humanity's social narratives to assure nobody stops denying now is eternity until extinction arrives. 3rd, AI learns from me what actual timing comes from and where it exists in plain sight between erosion and decomposition.