Liberal Forum

Z09, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

NEVER!
 

maineman » 22 May 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 3:06 pm

Fact?

And you claim that the transgender issue is enough - all by itself - to change political affiliation??

That’s some funny **** coming from a stolen valor ****** like you.

Any cult that condones the abuse of children? Yes, that alone defines a cesspool. I don't swim in cesspools, but you seem to relish swan diving into them. 
Keep failing, son.

Z09 » 22 May 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 4:44 pm

I feel so special!!

Maineman...(who voted for Joe Biden)..
....had me on ignore

Discussing truth is adversarial to him. He's another failure to thrive in a sane world.

maineman » 22 May 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 1:55 pm

He has not been able to do anything.  When Clarence says goodbye, and given his increasing troubles, he might pull an Abe Fortas pretty quickly now, Joe WILL have an opportunity to do something for women’s reproductive rights.

And as long as your party stands for withholding those women’s rights, I will proudly be a yellow dog democrat who will NEVER vote for a republican.

And an ignorant one at that, since YOU obviously prefer to be within the party that denies each state their Constitutional rights!
Unless of course, you can persuade me by revealing where you claim are those "reproductive rights" as specified in the Constitution or the Amendments.

You need to get it through your thick liberal head that what you WANT or CLAIM to be 'your rights', are nothing more than an exposure of your own ignorance and a desire to only accept any Supreme Court ruling that you agree with!  Read the 10th Amendment and then try to fathom a sensible response as to why it should not apply to what you expect of our highest court, with the full knowledge that the word "abortion" doesn't appear anywhere in either the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.

And while we're at it, maybe it's a good time for you to acknowledge that the unlimited rights to kill an innocent infant is not all that far removed from your claimed opposition to seeing a child indoctrinated into the leftist agenda of the LGBTQ+ Democrats who advocate for young children to decide to surgically change their gender or be forced to share a rest room or shower with adults of the opposite sex?

Or perhaps it is your contention that it's better to kill the child in the womb rather than see that child choose to have him castrate himself or for her to have her breasts surgically removed or be at the mercy of a predatory male in a locker room full of young girls?

Guess you could say your motto is "Kill 'em BEFORE they have a chance to be abused", huh?
 

Zeets2 » 22 May 2023, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:18 pm

And an ignorant one at that, since YOU obviously prefer to be within the party that denies each state their Constitutional rights!
Unless of course, you can persuade me by revealing where you claim are those "reproductive rights" as specified in the Constitution or the Amendments.

You need to get it through your thick liberal head that what you WANT or CLAIM to be 'your rights', are nothing more than an exposure of your own ignorance and a desire to only accept any Supreme Court ruling that you agree with!  Read the 10th Amendment and then try to fathom a sensible response as to why it should not apply to what you expect of our highest court, with the full knowledge that the word "abortion" doesn't appear anywhere in either the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.

And while we're at it, maybe it's a good time for you to acknowledge that the unlimited rights to kill an innocent infant is not all that far removed from your claimed opposition to seeing a child indoctrinated into the leftist agenda of the LGBTQ+ Democrats who advocate for young children to decide to surgically change their gender or be forced to share a rest room or shower with adults of the opposite sex?

Or perhaps it is your contention that it's better to kill the child in the womb rather than see that child choose to have him castrate himself or for her to have her breasts surgically removed or be at the mercy of a predatory male in a locker room full of young girls?

Guess you could say your motto is "Kill 'em BEFORE they have a chance to be abused", huh?

Maineman is a former blue hat U.N. guy.

Imagine that huh?

 
 

DeplorablePatriot » 22 May 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 5:10 pm

Any cult that condones the abuse of children? Yes, that alone defines a cesspool. I don't swim in cesspools, but you seem to relish swan diving into them. 
Keep failing, son.

Like I have repeatedly stated.  The democratic party does not condone the abuse of children regardless of your ridiculous, infantile assertions to the contrary.
 

maineman » 22 May 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:22 pm

Like I have repeatedly stated.  The democratic party does not condone the abuse of children regardless of your ridiculous, infantile assertions to the contrary.

They just support mutilating their genitals in the name of love.
 

maineman » 22 May 2023, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 4:01 pm

Back when women and uppity *** knew their place?  The country has **** just gone off the cliff ever since chicks and spooks got to vote.  

Let's speak about blacks then.

Is an attractive, young, white woman more or less prone to being sexually assaulted or another form of violence when walking through Baltimore at night, or Hayden, Idaho?
What's your answer and how did you arrive at it?  Don't be afraid of the truth and be honest. 
I'm waiting for your diversion or false equivalency...etc.

RedheadedStranger » 22 May 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:20 pm

Maineman is a former blue hat U.N. guy.

Imagine that huh?

One must be suspect of a Navy Commander assigned to a shore job, those boats must be expensive.
 

Z09 » 21 May 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

21 May 2023, 2:51 pm

Trans woman sues NYC yoga studio for $5 million after being told to leave women's locker room: 'Humiliation'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trans-wom ... umiliation

3 in a year from this piece of ****. 

And that *** @Xavier_Onassis  says that WE are trying to force OUR values on IT.
 

Z09 » 21 May 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 May 2023, 2:54 pm

C'mon Xavier....Maineman...

Explain to us why a transgender should be allowed to walk around naked in front of my 14 year old daughter....

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arkans ... hroom-bill

A bill that would criminalize transgender people using restrooms that match their gender identity won initial approval in the Arkansas Legislature on Tuesday, introducing a restriction critics said would be the most extreme in the country.

The bill approved by the majority-Republican Senate on a 19-7 vote would allow someone to be charged with misdemeanor sexual indecency with a child if they use a public restroom or changing room of the opposite sex when a minor is present.

The bill now heads to the majority-GOP House.The legislation goes even further than a North Carolina bathroom law that was enacted in 2016 and later repealed following widespread boycotts and protests. That law did not include any criminal penalties.
 

maineman » 22 May 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:22 pm

Like I have repeatedly stated.  The democratic party does not condone the abuse of children regardless of your ridiculous, infantile assertions to the contrary.

No, no mental abuse here whatsoever, Aqualung. Forcing children to question their sexuality before their hormones even kick in. What about focusing on the pledge of allegiance, manners, math, English, social studies, reading, art, music, and physical education?
No, your cult focuses on politically motivated child programming and sexual perversion. Shame on you for being enrolled in such a vile organization. You tip your hat to them, ****.

How public schools brainwash young kids with harmful transgender ideology (nypost.com)

Z09 » 22 May 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:34 pm

Can you imagine?

You get out of bed a Steven ..
By decide you're now a Stephanie..

And you want to walk into girls showers and see them naked ..

When refused, you get a lawyer and you demand $5 million..

The sick liberals 2023

And that *** xav takes the side of perversion - then calls his position libertardian. 
 
 

Z09 » 22 May 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:34 pm

Can you imagine?

You get out of bed a Steven ..
But decide you're now a Stephanie..

And you want to walk into girls showers and see them naked ..

When refused, you get a lawyer and you demand $5 million..

The sick liberals 2023

Mainerefuse lets it ride. "Oh, I'll not be a party in that, but that's my party's platform. Dumbestfukkery ever.
 

Cannonpointer » 22 May 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:36 pm

And that *** xav takes the side of perversion - then calls his position libertardian.

Please give Aqualung his subtitle!   

RedheadedStranger » 22 May 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:20 pm

Maineman is a former blue hat U.N. guy.

Imagine that huh?

Scary, but it WOULD make sense!
 

Zeets2 » 22 May 2023, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:18 pm

And an ignorant one at that, since YOU obviously prefer to be within the party that denies each state their Constitutional rights!
Unless of course, you can persuade me by revealing where you claim are those "reproductive rights" as specified in the Constitution or the Amendments.

You need to get it through your thick liberal head that what you WANT or CLAIM to be 'your rights', are nothing more than an exposure of your own ignorance and a desire to only accept any Supreme Court ruling that you agree with!  Read the 10th Amendment and then try to fathom a sensible response as to why it should not apply to what you expect of our highest court, with the full knowledge that the word "abortion" doesn't appear anywhere in either the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.

And while we're at it, maybe it's a good time for you to acknowledge that the unlimited rights to kill an innocent infant is not all that far removed from your claimed opposition to seeing a child indoctrinated into the leftist agenda of the LGBTQ+ Democrats who advocate for young children to decide to surgically change their gender or be forced to share a rest room or shower with adults of the opposite sex?

Or perhaps it is your contention that it's better to kill the child in the womb rather than see that child choose to have him castrate himself or for her to have her breasts surgically removed or be at the mercy of a predatory male in a locker room full of young girls?

Guess you could say your motto is "Kill 'em BEFORE they have a chance to be abused", huh?

So we disagree about abortion.  Do you really think there aren’t pro-choice republicans?  And I have repeatedly stated my opposition to minors being given gender reassignment therapy or surgery.  I know of no elected democrat who would say differently,  but if they did, I would respectfully disagree.
 

maineman » 22 May 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:48 pm

So we disagree about abortion.  Do you really think there aren’t pro-choice republicans?  And I have repeatedly stated my opposition to minors being given gender reassignment therapy or surgery.  I know of no elected democrat who would say differently,  but if they did, I would respectfully disagree.

Oh, ****. The dempigs create grooming rooms at schools for pre-pubes, and then PAY groomers to fruitloop them, fruitloop. 

Pretending it doesn't happen is just what cowards do. 

This is why cali is getting hollowed out - it is public policy to allow teachers to secretly groom kids, and laws to restrict that cannot even be HEARD because that would let parents testify to the outrages perpetrated on their families (aka, "hate speech," fruitcake):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkyaFS0OkL4
 
 

Zeets2 » 22 May 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:45 pm

Scary, but it WOULD make sense!

 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 10:17 pm

do you welcome me exercising my right to go and kill you as you stroll down the street?

 

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm

go for it.  
but do yourself a huge favor:  stay away yourself.  I have a lot of unresolved anger issues from my days as a UN observer, and, at this point in my life, I would LOVE to be able to exorcise some of those demons. fair warning.

HE IS A ******.. He didn't mean it       

maineman » 27 Mar 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Mar 2023, 2:32 pm

1.  fact
2.  sarcastic and rhetorical.... can't believe you thought I was serious

 
 

Zeets2 » 22 May 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2023, 6:45 pm

Scary, but it WOULD make sense!

There’s actually a book coming out next month about it.

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Yanks+in+blu ... nb_sb_noss