Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Transgender starts its 3rd lawsuit in a year....Wants to shower in front of girls....What a waste of the courts.....
Transgender starts its 3rd lawsuit in a year....Wants to shower in front of girls....What a waste of the courts.....
By ROG62
21 May 2023 3:07 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 May 2023 7:11 pm
Here's what your brethren party believes, El Fukko. Look at the **** you champion by your vote:maineman » 22 May 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So we disagree about abortion. Do you really think there aren’t pro-choice republicans? And I have repeatedly stated my opposition to minors being given gender reassignment therapy or surgery. I know of no elected democrat who would say differently, but if they did, I would respectfully disagree.
Pissing on our shoes and calling rain? Disingenuous retard. Aquabung.
Do I need to continue rubbing your nose in it like a dog before you'll learn?
22 May 2023 7:42 pm
What part of “I don’t really give a **** about transgender issues” did you not understand the first seven times I said it? My party is about a LOT of things and transgender issues are WAY down the list for the vast majority of democrats. For you to suggest that I abandon ALL the myriad commonly held issues: labor laws, women’s reproductive freedom, environment, immigration reform, universal health care, strong international alliances, maintaining a compassionate safety net, etc, etc…. You want me to disassociate myself from all of that because a handful of people want to change their genders and republicans want me to get as butt hurt about it as they are? GFY.DeplorablePatriot » 22 May 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's what your brethren party believes, El Fukko. Look at the **** you champion by your vote:
Pissing on our shoes and calling rain? Disingenuous retard. Aquabung.
Do I need to continue rubbing your nose in it like a dog before you'll learn?
22 May 2023 8:04 pm
Yawn. Look at the **** list. HANDFULL? That's a nation-wide survey, buttmaster. So goes your theory about democrats not wanting children to go through gender reassignment. Look at the numbers who don't give a rat **** about kids, compared to republicans.maineman » 22 May 2023, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ What part of “I don’t really give a **** about transgender issues” did you not understand the first seven times I said it? My party is about a LOT of things and transgender issues are WAY down the list for the vast majority of democrats. For you to suggest that I abandon ALL the myriad commonly held issues: labor laws, women’s reproductive freedom, environment, immigration reform, universal health care, strong international alliances, maintaining a compassionate safety net, etc, etc…. You want me to disassociate myself from all of that because a handful of people want to change their genders and republicans want me to get as butt hurt about it as they are? GFY.
Blasts one of your lies out of the water...I can go on, but you've got a mental block and a stubborn fixation on the democrat party, and how you are that "different good guy." You just suck. I tire of trying to have rational discussions with retards. You're gonzo. Bozo. Go play with your plastic ship in the tub. Do a bit of "Naval gunfire" and soften up the enemy between your legs. Be sure to bite the bubbles, my fine feathered fartknocker.
22 May 2023 8:15 pm
A minor issue….. we don’t give a ****. My party stands for a lot of things… and members of my party believe a lot of different things. The party doesn’t think that transgender issues are a big deal. We worry more about all those other issues I mentioned. Can you find a plank in the 2020 DNC Platform document that deals with transgender issues? No. Ya know why? BECAUSE IT’S A **** WEDGE ISSUE THE GOP WANTS TO EXPLOIT. It’s a nothingburger wrapped up in a **** sandwich. I literally NEVER think about transgender issues until some butt hurt RWNJ like you brings it up on here.DeplorablePatriot » 22 May 2023, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Yawn. Look at the **** list. So goes your theory about democrats not wanting children to go through gender reassignment. Look at the numbers who don't give a rat **** about kids, compared to republicans.
Blasts one of your lies out of the water...I can go on, but you've got a mental block and a stubborn fixation on the democrat party, and how you are that "different good guy." You just suck. I tire of trying to have rational discussions with retards. You're gonzo. Bozo.
22 May 2023 8:54 pm
uh if it’s not an open border what is it?maineman » 22 May 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Trans issues? Not a priority for me AT ALL. I’m not transgendered. None of my kids are transgendered. None of my kids compete in athletics anymore. I, quite literally, have no dog in that fight.
2. Biden does not HAVE an “open border” policy. I DO support comprehensive immigration reform and a pathway to citizenship for all the immigrants who are here. I think if America wants to quit being the world’s beacon of freedom and opportunity, we ought to give France their statue back.
3. I fully support our allied support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, and I applaud our president’s actions to restore our relationship within NATO. And I think that anyone who believes that Trump will end the conflict in Ukraine in 24 hours probably also believed him when he promised an immediate replacement to Obamacare that would be better, cost less and cover more Americans. You know the saying, Fool me once…
4. I think the quicker we shed our addiction to fossil fuels, the better chance we have of, just maybe, saving the planet.
5. Global climate change is not a hoax.
6. I believe that Trump was an amoral con man who took whatever help he could get from anyone to get elected. I know that Russia interfered in our election. I know that Trump obstructed the Mueller investigation. I do NOT know that Trump actively coordinated with Russia in their interference.
7. Given my political beliefs surrounding a woman’s right to chose, the need for sensible gun control legislation, and the need for comprehensive, compassionate immigration reform, I find it difficult to imagine me casting a vote for any of the pro-life, anti-gun control, anti-immigration reform republicans who have tossed their hats in the ring thus far.
23 May 2023 1:33 am
Every ******* democrat uses the word "reform" like it's some kind of good thing, when it actually means to loosen up on laws and practices which serve the greater good of our American citizens.
Prison reform: Pander to criminals, lighten sentences and punishment, early releases, reduced bail or place criminals back on the streets immediately where they can re-offend, which they almost always do.
Border reform: Allow more criminal aliens to flood our country, cost billions annually to give social services, feed and house the parasites, 2/3 of which will never return for court dates. Increase brown and black gang sizes, increase drug/sex/human trafficking and street murders.
Police reform: Restrict the police from upholding the law, scaring them into thinking twice about protecting themselves or people they need to protect, when there is no time for it, and police who require to make split second life-saving decisions pause, placing them in danger, as well as citizens. The police are getting murdered as a result of this "reform."
BLM: A type of reform which emphasizes placing criminal blacks on a pedestal, punish cops or rake them over the coals for killing justly within the law before they are found guilty of any wrongdoing (only if a black criminal is killed), making martyrs out of black thugs, and glamorizing black gangster rap music which is nothing but vile, hatred for white people. The BLM movement is the most racist group there is, along with democrats in general.
**** mainelame. He's expendable, disposable, a threat to us all. Along with his group of Anti-American ****.
23 May 2023 12:03 pm
au contraire… overseas, joint operations with international participation in a war zone are plum assignments for all professional warriors. But I can understand how you might be unaware of that, Cletis….being the armchair general that you are.RebelGator » 22 May 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ One must be suspect of a Navy Commander assigned to a shore job, those boats must be expensive.
23 May 2023 12:24 pm
I found it. This was your second reply to the same post of mine. In the future, you should try to compose your thoughts before you fire off your knee jerk first response.DeplorablePatriot » 22 May 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's speak about blacks then.
Is an attractive, young, white woman more or less prone to being sexually assaulted or another form of violence when walking through Baltimore at night, or Hayden, Idaho?
What's your answer and how did you arrive at it? Don't be afraid of the truth and be honest.
I'm waiting for your diversion or false equivalency...etc.
To answer your question… I am sure that Hayden, Idaho is a delightful place and white women are much safer there than in Baltimore, or Los Angeles, or Louisville, or Pittsburgh, or Anchorage, for that matter. Clearly there is appreciably less crime in smaller towns than in larger urban areas.
I notice that YOU avoided my question earlier which is germane: “You tell me…when was this golden era of calm, happy prosperous American conservatism for which you wistfully pine?”
And when you answer THAT question, answer this follow up: “Do you think that back in that calm happy prosperous era, that the relative safety of women walking alone in those two different municipalities you mentioned would have been appreciably different than it is today?
23 May 2023 12:27 pm
The border may be able to be breached, and it has always been able to be breached. Biden does not have an OPEN BORDER POLICY.
23 May 2023 12:36 pm
Not what the border patrol saysmaineman » 23 May 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The border may be able to be breached, and it has always been able to be breached. Biden does not have an OPEN BORDER POLICY.
23 May 2023 12:39 pm
23 May 2023 2:23 pm
You found it. STOP right there. Let's get that issue cleared up before continuing off the rails as you are so proficient at.maineman » 23 May 2023, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I found it. This was your second reply to the same post of mine. In the future, you should try to compose your thoughts before you fire off your knee jerk first response.
To answer your question… I am sure that Hayden, Idaho is a delightful place and white women are much safer there than in Baltimore, or Los Angeles, or Louisville, or Pittsburgh, or Anchorage, for that matter. Clearly there is appreciably less crime in smaller towns than in larger urban areas.
I notice that YOU avoided my question earlier which is germane: “You tell me…when was this golden era of calm, happy prosperous American conservatism for which you wistfully pine?”
And when you answer THAT question, answer this follow up: “Do you think that back in that calm happy prosperous era, that the relative safety of women walking alone in those two different municipalities you mentioned would have been appreciably different than it is today?
Get to the real truth behind why. It has nothing to do with big cities -vs- smaller towns whatsoever. It's all about the criminal element of non-whites who reside in those big cities. Thug blacks and brown. It's common knowledge, but you won't go there. You are the three monkeys. Proving my point...take the exact same size towns, one 98% white, one 98% black. The white woman will be in far more danger walking through the black town. And since conservative, clean, patriotic, educated, lawful, and affluent towns like Hayden, ID are 99% white, a well-behaved, lawful black woman can walk the street little to no fear at all.
It's the way it is. Address it, if you dare. Have you seen the CHAZ chimpouts in Seattle? Most white people aren't into acting like rabid vermin.
23 May 2023 3:27 pm
maineman » 23 May 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The border may be able to be breached, and it has always been able to be breached. Biden does not have an OPEN BORDER POLICY.
He certainly isn't doing anything to secure it more than it is, now is he?
It costs well over one billion dollars annually ( and continues to rise by the minute) to keep these parasites alive and well with benefits for the entire duration of time they wait until their court date, using tax dollars from hard working American citizens...while O-Biden's clan talks of reducing Medicare, SS benefits and veteran's benefits.
I won't knee-jerk your answer.
So, are you good with that?
23 May 2023 3:53 pm
So…this is a race thing for you.DeplorablePatriot » 23 May 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You found it. STOP right there. Let's get that issue cleared up before continuing off the rails as you are so proficient at.
Get to the real truth behind why. It has nothing to do with big cities -vs- smaller towns whatsoever. It's all about the criminal element of non-whites who reside in those big cities. Thug blacks and brown. It's common knowledge, but you won't go there. You are the three monkeys. Proving my point...take the exact same size towns, one 98% white, one 98% black. The white woman will be in far more danger walking through the black town. And since conservative, clean, patriotic, educated, lawful, and affluent towns like Hayden, ID are 99% white, a well-behaved, lawful black woman can walk the street little to no fear at all.
It's the way it is. Address it, if you dare. Have you seen the CHAZ chimpouts in Seattle? Most white people aren't into acting like rabid vermin.
This idyllic calm, happy, prosperous former America you pine for is segregated? Is that what would give you a woody? America before those uppity *** got all those “civil rights”….that’s the America you want to return to, is it? Them goddamned bleeding heart ***-loving liberals went and let those animals think they were just as human as a white man and the country hasn’t been the calm, happy, prosperous place it was like in the time of Beaver Cleaver ever since. Be honest. That’s it, isn’t it?
Would you round up all the blacks and force them to live in specific neighborhoods, like negro shtetls? I suppose if that didn’t work, we could put ‘em in camps like FDR did to the Japs, or Hitler did to the Jews, amirite? What would be your next phase? Boat ‘em back to Africa, or just give ‘em a shower before baking?
23 May 2023 3:56 pm
LolDeplorablePatriot » 23 May 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ He certainly isn't doing anything to secure it more than it is, now is he?
It costs well over one billion dollars annually ( and continues to rise by the minute) to keep these parasites alive and well with benefits for the entire duration of time they wait until their court date, using tax dollars from hard working American citizens...while O-Biden's clan talks of reducing Medicare, SS benefits and veteran's benefits.
I won't knee-jerk your answer.
So, are you good with that?
those “parasites” touch nearly every single piece of fruit or vegetables, and a majority of the poultry you shove down your pie hole.
Bon appétit!
23 May 2023 4:19 pm
23 May 2023 4:30 pm
Listen Mr. McDuh...You ask if it's a race thing? That's pretty obvious. Yes, oh triggered one, It IS a race thing. We can't have a discussion about race? Out of bounds for you? Again, a boorish and lengthy dissertation instead of addressing the issue.maineman » 23 May 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So…this is a race thing for you.
This idyllic calm, happy, prosperous former America you pine for is segregated? Is that what would give you a woody? America before those uppity *** got all those “civil rights”….that’s the America you want to return to, is it? Them goddamned bleeding heart ***-loving liberals went and let those animals think they were just as human as a white man and the country hasn’t been the calm, happy, prosperous place it was like in the time of Beaver Cleaver ever since. Be honest. That’s it, isn’t it?
Would you round up all the blacks and force them to live in specific neighborhoods, like negro shtetls? I suppose if that didn’t work, we could put ‘em in camps like FDR did to the Japs, or Hitler did to the Jews, amirite? What would be your next phase? Boat ‘em back to Africa, or just give ‘em a shower before baking?
I've had more mixed race friends/coworkers and fellow military teammates than you have ever experienced. Good people, and patriots, all of them. The blacks I worked with hated *** probably more than anyone. They gave them a bad image. I'd feel the same way if the majority of whites acted in the same manner as thug *** do.
Stay in your bubble. It's cozy inside. Obama, Maxine, Sharpton, Jackson, and other highly racist democrats fueled racism, exacerbating it, which stirred up a hornet's nest of militant and criminal blacks. BLM said to whites "we're coming for your homes." Racist much?
So, **** off or spew more **** and paint false pictures, desk boy.
23 May 2023 6:24 pm
You have yet to tell me what calm, happy, prosperous conservative period in history you’d like to take us all back to in the way-back machine. Why don’t you just put on your big boy pants and admit that you’re torn between the antebellum period when you could sit on your veranda and watch the *** you own pick your cotton, or the post-reconstruction period when you could lynch them at will, or maybe just the post WW2 era when you could beat them for eating at your favorite lunch counter, make them sit at the back of the bus, or make them drink from separate drinking fountains? Decisions…decisions… decisions.DeplorablePatriot » 23 May 2023, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen Mr. McDuh...You ask if it's a race thing? That's pretty obvious. Yes, oh triggered one, It IS a race thing. We can't have a discussion about race? Out of bounds for you? Again, a boorish and lengthy dissertation instead of addressing the issue.
I've had more mixed race friends/coworkers and fellow military teammates than you have ever experienced. Good people, and patriots, all of them. The blacks I worked with hated *** probably more than anyone. They gave them a bad image. I'd feel the same way if the majority of whites acted in the same manner as thug *** do.
Stay in your bubble. It's cozy inside. Obama, Maxine, Sharpton, Jackson, and other highly racist democrats fueled racism, exacerbating it, which stirred up a hornet's nest of militant and criminal blacks. BLM said to whites "we're coming for your homes." Racist much?
So, **** off or spew more **** and paint false pictures, desk boy.
23 May 2023 6:34 pm
Mister Single Italian?DeplorablePatriot » 23 May 2023, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I've had more mixed race friends/coworkers and fellow military teammates than you have ever experienced. Good people, and patriots, all of them.
You never served a MINUTE in uniform, and to suggest that your fictitious service brought you into contact with more minorities than I did in my quarter of a century in uniform being led by minority members, serving alongside them, and then leading them is **** laughable, you stolen valor ******. You disgust me.
23 May 2023 6:43 pm
Wowmaineman » 23 May 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Mister Single Italian?
You never served a MINUTE in uniform, and to suggest that your fictitious service brought you into contact with more minorities than I did in my quarter of a century in uniform being led by minority members, serving alongside them, and then leading them is **** laughable, you stolen valor ******. You disgust me.
Are YOU accusing someone of stolen valor without any proof while boasting about your own service... without any proof?
Interesting...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 6117 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 6091 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: okhttp, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, proximic, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Baiduspider