Majik » 31 May 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Not a story ....
More like a trained analytical analysis by a seasoned veteran ....
No, Joe gave the Taliban access to Afghanistan's money..... ..funny how you cannot make the distinction.
well, one is a terrorist organization ......
I don't have one of those.
an opinion from a partisan hack.Majik » 31 May 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Not a story ....
More like a trained analytical analysis by a seasoned veteran ....
No, Joe gave the Taliban access to Afghanistan's money..... ..funny how you cannot make the distinction.
well, one is a terrorist organization ......
maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ I don't have one of those.
remember? Ogunquit? years ago? surf line. First experience with oral sex?
YOU said it.
I have no idea who you are talking about.
maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ I have no idea who you are talking about.
There are no skanks in my life... not since that time - a long time ago - when I was driving through North Carolina and I **** your mother. She always WAS a serious skank. Has she put down the crack pipe yet?
I wouldn't be alive? why? because I would have died from the STD she gave me?FJB » 01 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ you wouldn't be alive today if that happened.
the skank is a lawyer that is funded by soros... you admitted that fact already
Partisanship has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it wasn't the Taliban's money ....maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ an opinion from a partisan hack.
I don't LIKE the Taliban. I don't like the regime in Iran much either, but that doesn't mean we can keep their own money from them.
who runs the government of Afghanistan?Majik » 01 Jun 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ Partisanship has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it wasn't the Taliban's money ....
The Taliban is a Terrorist organization ......Period.
And Joe not only left them an arsenal any terrorist organization on the planet would salivate over aquiring but also gave them billions of the former Afghanistan governments funds.
And by the way ....
What gives us and our allies the right to steal and relocate money from a sovereign country like Russia ?
Are they a terrorist organization that has killed Americans ?
do you always answer a question with a question?Majik » 01 Jun 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ Are they a terrorist organization that has killed Americans ?
Won’t you just **** off, you *** *** cocksucker?
since I am none of those things, no... I won't...Cracker.
Joe by leaving an arsenal and releasing billions to a terrorist organization that has killed Americans and our allies with impunity is a disgrace to every person whom served there, died there and lost their limbs there ....
There is evidence there WERE agents in the crowd. It’s just a matter of how many.
Is this **** not white himself?maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ since I am none of those things, no... I won't...Cracker.
I am, but I am a yankee. you are a redneck cracker. there is a difference.
aren't you glad that law enforcement had assets in place? There is certainly no evidence that LEOs participated in any of the violence.neueregel » 01 Jun 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ There is evidence there WERE agents in the crowd. It’s just a matter of how many.
what a **** drama queen!Majik » 01 Jun 2023, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ Joe by leaving an arsenal and releasing billions to a terrorist organization that has killed Americans and our allies with impunity is a disgrace to every person whom served there, died there and lost their limbs there ....
and all for Joe's political theatre ....
while also emboldening our enemies everywhere ....