He is very professional...Wray, the typical "I don't know **** about what's happening in my department under my watch so as not to incriminate me" ****...roadkill » 29 May 2023, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ Me too...he knows how to deal with people and he does it with good manners too.
ROG62 » 29 May 2023, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ He is very professional...Wray, the typical "I don't know **** about what's happening in my department under my watch so as not to incriminate me" ****...
It's like talking to a ROCK...Squatchman » 29 May 2023, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Because as everyone knows,if it's on the internet it has to be true.
And from the reaction of all of the reeps here that I triggered you know it isn't.
Where oh where has the whistleblower gone?
Where oh where can he be?
You don't have facts,you're just hoping some will present itself.ConservativeWave » 29 May 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ It's like talking to a ROCK...
AGAIN... ACCORDING to "The FACTS"... and documented by:
1) The Hunter Laptop,
2) FISA Records,
3) Trial Testimony Under Oath,
4) THOUSANDS of pages of FOIA and Legal records,
5) Congressional testimony documented by transcripts and "Youtube videos", and
6) Thousands of pages of OFFICIAL government Records...
HA!! And WHAT do YOU have to refute THE FACTS ??
YOUR **** IS NOT considered "evidence" !!
REGARDLESS WHAT you THINK, BELIEVE, or HOPE is true !
But,but Biden!Xavier_Onassis » 29 May 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ Not one scrap of evidence on Hunter's laptop could ever be admissible in any court of law in the US, because it was not in Hunter's possession for a long period of time. Ever lawyer in this country knows this.
Just the dummies don't.
The FACTS are CLEAR for ALL to see... and what YOU THINK doesn't matter... the latest polls indicate that 63% of America now BELIEVES that the FBI is corrupt...Squatchman » 29 May 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ You don't have facts,you're just hoping some will present itself.
If republican lawmakers have the evudence why don't they make some criminal referrals?
Because they're lying to you.
And of course like a good little MAGA sheep you believe them.
And then you come here bleating about nonexistant "facts."
You guys had "evidence" of election fraud.
, Still waiting on that to surface too.p
You know who does have facts and evidence?
The prosecuters in the upcoming cases against Trump.
Obstruction in the Mar A Lago documents case.
Election Interference in Georgia.
Conspiracy to defraud the government in the Jan.6th probe by special counsel Jack Smith.