thank you jerra-
n is for nothing which is what straight people should say when they don't like books about lbqrrxxx++++++
It's the odds between grooming as a cause and other factors, particularly genetics, as a cause. I don't know how the odds break down between them, you're right, but I don't believe you can groom just anyone to be a queer. Maybe your own life experience leads you to a different answer.RedheadedStranger » 30 May 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Wait... didn't you make a point earlier that stated "the odds are that they are naturally inclined"?
How can that be if you have no way of calculating what the odds are?
Life experience has taught me that kids are influenced by their surroundings and environment.jack » 30 May 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ It's the odds between grooming as a cause and other factors, particularly genetics, as a cause. I don't know how the odds break down between them, you're right, but I don't believe you can groom just anyone to be a queer. Maybe your own life experience leads you to a different answer.
How do you explain the high rate of homosexuality between priests and choir boys?jack » 30 May 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ It's the odds between grooming as a cause and other factors, particularly genetics, as a cause. I don't know how the odds break down between them, you're right, but I don't believe you can groom just anyone to be a queer. Maybe your own life experience leads you to a different answer.
Tell us what the anti-grooming laws are.RedheadedStranger » 30 May 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Life experience has taught me that kids are influenced by their surroundings and environment.
Subjecting kids to LGBTQXYZ "lifestyles" at an early age in the name of inclusivity can, and more than likely will, influence the way they perceive human sexuality as adults... especially when the are exposed to in every aspect of society.
That is grooming, plain and simple... and being complacent in this behavior makes you as guilty as the perpetrators in my book.
No, the kids should be removed from the home.Xavier_Onassis » 30 May 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell us what the anti-grooming laws are.
Do you presume to say that all gay parents should be prosecuted for "grooming" unless they can prove that their adopted children are heterosexual?
Good point.RedheadedStranger » 30 May 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Life experience has taught me that kids are influenced by their surroundings and environment.
Subjecting kids to LGBTQXYZ "lifestyles" at an early age in the name of inclusivity can, and more than likely will, influence the way they perceive human sexuality as adults... especially when the are exposed to in every aspect of society.
That is grooming, plain and simple... and being complacent in this behavior makes you as guilty as the perpetrators in my book.
What I'm aware of is the high rate of abuse by priests against choir boys.RebelGator » 30 May 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ How do you explain the high rate of homosexuality between priests and choir boys?
good luck with that, Cletis.
Do you think that might be because of attending all-boy's schools? When there are no females around (just as in gay marriage), children can be influenced by their environment and what they learn by observation.jack » 30 May 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ What I'm aware of is the high rate of abuse by priests against choir boys.
Yes, l know.....it's just like the global warming hoax, if it was really an alarming situation, one would think banning airline flights would be a priority.maineman » 30 May 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ good luck with that, Cletis.![]()
Trying to outlaw gay people from adopting children is no more destined for any degree of success than trying to stuff toothpaste back into the tube.
I would suggest that automobiles generate FAR more pollution per passenger mile than airliners.RebelGator » 30 May 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, l know.....it's just like the global warming hoax, if it was really an alarming situation, one would think banning airline flights would be a priority.
ACCORDING TO TRANS PEOPLE THEY CAN.Xavier_Onassis » 30 May 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Of course a gay man could have a child with a woman. They could use a surrogate. I was referring to the fact that two men cannot have a biological child between them.
As though you know anything about trans people or biology.
AND YOU DO??Xavier_Onassis » 30 May 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ As though you know anything about trans people or biology.
BUT WE DO KNOW AMABS CAN'T HAVE CHILDREN, AFABS CAN.Xavier_Onassis » 30 May 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ As though you know anything about trans people or biology.
And how many people do you see on this site defending those sick ****?Xavier_Onassis » 30 May 2023, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Is not what Jehovah's Witnesses do with their children not also a form of "grooming"?
No one tries to take their children away.
The same was true of a large number of "end of the world" cults.