Liberal Forum

jack » 31 May 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 3:22 pm

Interesting choice of a book; one you have in your home library?

are you going to protest the banning of those books?

jerrab » 31 May 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 2:34 pm

you are so limited in intelligence it shows in every post.

Tossing **** and hoping it sticks?

Peter Buttgag took a stethoscope to a turd and thought he hear a heartbeat. Sent out baby shower invitations.

Someone tell this jerk that he is not funny.

BuckNaked » 31 May 2023, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 7:24 pm

They are fubared already, they look mixed race

It is not illegal to look mixed race, it is not illegal to BE mixed race, you dumb bigot.

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 2:34 pm

In many Muslim nations, female circumcision is considered normal and is performed around age ten. I am pretty sure that the little girls that have this done to them are not willing participants.

So much for your lauding the practices of Muslims.'
THey are backward, and so are all of you clowns.

Female genital mutilation offends your sensibilities but western genital mutilation is a laudable medical practice? Yer weird. 
 

Neo » 31 May 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 8:50 pm

Female genital mutilation offends your sensibilities but western genital mutilation is a laudable medical practice? Yer weird.

Negro clits are of supreme worth.

America kid clits are to be politicized at the LIB Alter 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 8:42 pm

Someone tell this jerk that he is not funny.

You're not funny. There. Where are my greenies?

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 2:34 pm

In many Muslim nations, female circumcision is considered normal and is performed around age ten. I am pretty sure that the little girls that have this done to them are not willing participants.

So much for your lauding the practices of Muslims.'
THey are backward, and so are all of you clowns.

This isn't the Middle East, cornholio. Interesting how you champion something by using a gutter religion that stones women for being raped. 
Beck made a song about you. "loser"

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 8:43 pm

It is not illegal to look mixed race, it is not illegal to BE mixed race, you dumb bigot.

He didn't say it was illegal. He said they were FUBAR from the get-go for being mongrels. The truth is a bitch, ain't it, schmukko?

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 8:42 pm

Someone tell this jerk that he is not funny.

are you going to protest banning homo lit for kids?

'me and my best friend are gay lovers and we are both 8 years old.'
 

jack » 31 May 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 3:02 pm

Unheard of because queers are scared **** to talk about it. If you think it doesn't exist consider that homosexuality exists among all mammals and is quite common among some; it is a biological phenomenon that cultural mores aren't likely to extinguish in humans.

Homosexuality in nature is greatly exaggerated for political reasons. 
 

Neo » 31 May 2023, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 9:28 pm

Homosexuality in nature is greatly exaggerated for political reasons.

right one out of 200 might be naturally gay but now 20 out of 60 are gay.

thanks  to all the homosexual  books in kindergarten and up that have pushed for the past 15 years or so plus media influences and gay adoptions.

and no they do not target children. ha. biggest lie ever told.
 

LincolnNebraska » 31 May 2023, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 4:34 pm

Hi sock!

And there you have what passes on the Right for a lucid debate argument.

sootedupCyndi » 30 May 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2023, 12:39 pm

And- know what pizzes me off.. To see some stoopid liberal on the tv declaring... "They're banning books"!!!!
god bless them if someone is banning this crap -targeted at kids.

and transwomen say anyone including real women who are against transwomen (actually men) competing in girls sports are anti feminist and against women.

sootedupCyndi » 30 May 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2023, 12:39 pm

And- know what pizzes me off.. To see some stoopid liberal on the tv declaring... "They're banning books"!!!!
god bless them if someone is banning this crap -targeted at kids.

@sooted up Cyndi  


 

Xavier_Onassis » 31 May 2023, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2023, 8:43 pm

It is not illegal to look mixed race, it is not illegal to BE mixed race, you dumb bigot.

uh did i say it was illegal?

sootedupCyndi » 30 May 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2023, 12:39 pm

And- know what pizzes me off.. To see some stoopid liberal on the tv declaring... "They're banning books"!!!!
god bless them if someone is banning this crap -targeted at kids.

@sooted up Cyndi  


 

sootedupCyndi » 30 May 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2023, 12:39 pm

And- know what pizzes me off.. To see some stoopid liberal on the tv declaring... "They're banning books"!!!!
god bless them if someone is banning this crap -targeted at kids.

they  also say huckleberry finn was also banned

the reason they banned huckleberry finn was because twayne used the n word. and blacks found it objectional. nothing about conservatives.

---------------------------------------
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/ar ... 20mindless.

Alleged racist content has been the reason most often cited for banning or challenging Huck Finn, particularly since 1957 and the rise of the civil rights movement in the United States. From the beginning, however, some critics objected to Huck Finn’s “racial content.” Those critics note that Twain uses the word *** 213 times in the book. Detractors have also objected to what they call Jim’s “childlike character” and maintain that he lacks credibility as an African American

 
 

https://unherd.com/2023/02/the-problem- ... are-women/