ab?
link
I hear you. I still remain unconvinced, however, that there has not ALWAYS been some segment of the population that has known their non-heterosexual orientation since early childhood and suppressed that because of societal and FAMILY pressure to be "normal". I would imagine that adopted children of gay couples would see the positive aspects of their parent's relationship and would be much freer to be themselves... that is not "grooming". That is "accepting" and "affirming"... and "loving".jerrab » 29 May 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ link
-----------------------------------------------------------
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20642872/
Ten narrative studies involving family histories of 262 children of gay fathers and lesbian mothers were evaluated statistically in response to Morrison's (2007) concerns about Cameron's (2006) research that had involved three narrative studies. Despite numerous attempts to bias the results in favour of the null hypothesis and allowing for up to 20 (of 63, 32%) coding errors, Cameron's (2006) hypothesis that gay and lesbian parents would be more likely to have gay, lesbian, bisexual or unsure (of sexual orientation) sons and daughters was confirmed. Percentages of children of gay and lesbian parents who adopted non-heterosexual identities ranged between 16% and 57%, with odds ratios of 1.7 to 12.1, depending on the mix of child and parent genders. Daughters of lesbian mothers were most likely (33% to 57%; odds ratios from 4.5 to 12.1) to report non-heterosexual identities.
**** you. It's INBEV, moron.
Not much difference between affirming and grooming. Stats don't lie.maineman » 29 May 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I hear you. I still remain unconvinced, however, that there has not ALWAYS been some segment of the population that has known their non-heterosexual orientation since early childhood and suppressed that because of societal and FAMILY pressure to be "normal". I would imagine that adopted children of gay couples would see the positive aspects of their parent's relationship and would be much freer to be themselves... that is not "grooming". That is "accepting" and "affirming"... and "loving".
One is letting your child know that he or she can be whatever he or she wants to be and that your love will be unconditional.Neo » 29 May 2023, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Not much difference between affirming and grooming. Stats don't lie.
****. 60% of kids raised in catholic homes remain catholic as adults. Indoctrination and grooming. Same applies to kids raised in lgbtqrstuv cheerleading households.maineman » 29 May 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ One is letting your child know that he or she can be whatever he or she wants to be and that your love will be unconditional.
One is urging your child to be something he or she isn't naturally inclined to be.
So yeah... there is a BIG difference between them.
religion equates to sexual orientation??????Neo » 29 May 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ ****. 60% of kids raised in catholic homes remain catholic as adults. Indoctrination and grooming. Same applies to kids raised in lgbtqrstuv cheerleading households.
and are you suggesting that 60% of kids raised by gay parents are, themselves, gay? 60%?? Really????Neo » 29 May 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ ****. 60% of kids raised in catholic homes remain catholic as adults. Indoctrination and grooming. Same applies to kids raised in lgbtqrstuv cheerleading households.
Suggesting that kids raised in same sexed households are many times more likely to grow up to be members of the lgbtqrstuv cult. 60% is high, it's closer to 30% from studies I have read. Far higher than the 5% and quickly rising baseline. Concerted grooming efforts have already risen 1% to 5% and climbing.maineman » 29 May 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ and are you suggesting that 60% of kids raised by gay parents are, themselves, gay? 60%?? Really????
maineman » 29 May 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ and are you suggesting that 60% of kids raised by gay parents are, themselves, gay? 60%?? Really????
grooming? or affirming??? you got nothing.Neo » 29 May 2023, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Suggesting that kids raised in same sexed households are many times more likely to grow up to be members of the lgbtqrstuv cult. 60% is high, it's closer to 30% from studies I have read. Far higher than the 5% and quickly rising baseline. Concerted grooming efforts have already risen 1% to 5% and climbing.
I don't care if gender cultists corrupt their own children. Their rights as parents as long as they are not **** them or exposing them to porn it's not the governments business. Spreading their cancer to society at large will be resisted.
because they were born that way. duh.
let me know when that starts happening. until then, STFU.Neo » 29 May 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't care if gender cultists corrupt their own children. Their rights as parents as long as they are not **** them or exposing them to porn it's not the governments business. Spreading their cancer to society at large will be resisted.
then you would have data that would show that 100% of kids with gay parents identify as gay.jerrab » 29 May 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ someone who would be straight will be influenced by gay parents.
a boy with two *** fathers will be a ***.