By not denouncing this garbage you are as guilty as the school board member that was trying to shut that parent in the video up and refusing to answer his questions.maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ you claim I" support" it.
I NEVER have.
So... put on your big boy pants and prove that assertion or retract it.
take your pick, @****, you **** pansy-*** ******.
We can bet a shiny new dollar you're not going to make a claim counter to his assertion.maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ you claim I" support" it.
I NEVER have.
So... put on your big boy pants and prove that assertion or retract it.
take your pick, @****, you **** pansy-*** ******.
He won't denounce the people he supports. He' just a cry baby demanding you "prove" what we all know to be true.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ By not denouncing this garbage you are as guilty as the school board member that was trying to shut that parent in the video up and refusing to answer his questions.
Anything less than saying that having those books available to children in school libraries is unacceptable is the same as saying it's okay that they're there.
Denounce it, or own it. Your choice.
I don't support it. pure and simple.Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2023, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ We can bet a shiny new dollar you're not going to make a claim counter to his assertion.
You'll squawk, "prove it," but ya won't deny it...
Did that hurt to say, maine ******?maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't support it. pure and simple.
no go **** yourself you admitted cocksucker.
He stated earlier that grooming kids in the Maine school system isn't happening, yet Maine has the highest percentage of K-12 kids in the Nation that "identify" as LGBTQXYZ at nearly 30%.Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ He won't denounce the people he supports. He' just a cry baby demanding you "prove" what we all know to be true.
He doesn't give an actual **** about his grandchildren. If he did, he would be up in arms that they're being groomed - not turning his head away and refusing to look.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Until somebody else's twisted kid assaults or kills your kid or grandkid in the school bathroom... then it becomes your problem.
That's not denouncing it Popeye.maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't support it. pure and simple.
no go **** yourself you admitted cocksucker.
We can walk and chew gum, fraud. It's not the "either/or" that you pretend.maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I think I am much more worried about some gun-toting RWNJ shooting up their school. Grooming isn't really a very big issue up here in Maine. I find it hilarious that grooming is SO much more important to the republican party than the events at Sandy Hook or Uvalde or Columbine.
He would know this if he gave HALF a **** about his grandkids. The ****** doesn't.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The Sandy Hook, Uvalde and Columbine shooters weren't perpetrated by "RWNJs".
30% of High Schoolers in Maine are "identifying" as LGBTQXYZ in 2023. Higher that any other State in the Nation and definitely higher than the National averages.
https://www.themainewire.com/2023/02/ma ... n-schools/
You would know this if you didn't have your head in the sand.
I SAID NO SUBSTITUTIONS, ***!!!!maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ ... I would rather have a school full of cross-dressing boys in dresses
This^RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not denouncing it Popeye.
You don't support it because you don't give a **** one way or the other that those books are there.
In short, you don't care if the kids are being groomed or not... which means you're okay with it happening.
Oh, he has addressed that - it's cuz more acceptun.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ He stated earlier that grooming kids in the Maine school system isn't happening, yet Maine has the highest percentage of K-12 kids in the Nation that "identify" as LGBTQXYZ at nearly 30%.
1 in 3 school aged children in Maine identify as LGBTQXYZ.
Let that sink in.
@****... you can continue to put words in MY mouth and then denounce me for those words, but it will be a soliloquy from here on out. We're done.RedheadedStranger » 01 Jun 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not denouncing it Popeye.
You don't support it because you don't give a **** one way or the other that those books are there.
In short, you don't care if the kids are being groomed or not... which means you're okay with it happening.
These people that claim they don't support this **** while they stand idly by while it's happening are just as bad or worse that the sick **** that are promoting it.Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2023, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ He would know this if he gave HALF a **** about his grandkids. The ****** doesn't.
do you really need to disparage my CHILDREN for chrissakes? Have you NO sense of honesty or decency?Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ This^
And if ya don't believe the red headed stranger, just read ******'s own admission. He doesn't give a **** about grooming - and he raised a *** son who engages in it, while denying it ever happens.
I accept your white flag groomer.maineman » 01 Jun 2023, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Redheaded Stranger, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
I know that I cannot ignore you, but I will "ignore" you nonetheless. You're a paper tiger martinet tin pot dictator and I chose not to engage you EVER. I hope that doesn't upset you TOO much.Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ This^
And if ya don't believe the red headed stranger, just read ******'s own admission. He doesn't give a **** about grooming - and he raised a *** son who engages in it, while denying it ever happens.