Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Is Trump going to jail?
Is Trump going to jail?
By Prospero
1 Jun 2023 10:57 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 Jun 2023 11:28 am
You need helpCannonpointer » 07 Jun 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Link?
I merely highlighted his policies and his attitudes. I did not "attack" him, you fool, as, BEING AN FDR DEMOCRAT, I agree with his positions, fruitcake.
And there is your presentism, turd.
You pretend that a man who knew his mind and knew his principles - a man who RAN AND FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED THE COUNTRY - was the waffling victim of quaint and antiquated mores; a veritable zelig to those around him: a victim of "the times."
We all know that were he not a lionized progressive of the past, you would be dismissing him as a DWM and calling him a racist. But you think it unwise to sling **** on a founding father of american liberalism, and so you engage in tawdry presentism, embracing his wisdom where it fits your hand-me-down template and pretending the things that don't are a result of handlebar mustaches and ostrich feathers in ladies' caps - a mere fashion foible.
You're an idiot - and a presentist.
Oh, please, mister, get out of my head. How can you read me ike a book? Please stop.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, I watch you dick suckers trash the **** WESTERN CANNON and refer to its brilliant authors as DWMs, and you think me unaware of presentism, you **** fruitcake?
It's your stock in trade, fruitcake. It's what you people DO. It's ALL you people do, besides lying and projecting - which is precisely what you were doing when you ascribed YOUR practice to me, midwit.
I really have no response to that insanity, fruitcake. The only thing I can agree with is that you sound like a squirrel on crack. You are quite coming apart at the seams.
You might want to ask AI to step in, Pookie Bear.
You appear as one of those fellows who comes to drain the swamp and then encounters alligators.
7 Jun 2023 11:28 am
righteous » 07 Jun 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Racist and bigotry language, huh, the gall of him.
Fairy Mary
whatever
7 Jun 2023 11:32 am
RedheadedStranger » 07 Jun 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ You're the one that got called on your ignorance and then doubled down on the stupid instead of owning it... not me.
How does it feel to be completely useless?
7 Jun 2023 11:43 am
How does it feel to be a total liberal asshole shill?
7 Jun 2023 2:19 pm
You tell me.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
7 Jun 2023 2:20 pm
That's a damning indictment.Prospero » 06 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ AI"s assessment nails it: AI Prompt: Critique Cannonpointer's argument (submitted in full).**********************************
- Ad hominem: Personal attacks on the individual instead of addressing the substance of their argument.
- Straw man: Misrepresenting or exaggerating the opponent's position to make it easier to attack.
- Hasty generalization: Drawing a conclusion about a whole group based on a limited sample or anecdotal evidence.
- Appeal to ridicule: Dismissing an argument by mocking or ridiculing the opponent rather than addressing their points.
- False cause: Assuming a causal relationship between two events without sufficient evidence.
- Red herring: Introducing irrelevant or unrelated information to divert attention from the main argument.
- Loaded language: Using emotionally charged words or phrases to evoke a specific reaction without providing substantial evidence or reasoning.
In short, Cannonpointer, you are simply full of ****. Not to mention you are phony. For if you were really an "FDR Dem", you'd be on my side.
Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, so now you reveal your true colors: you are a racist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09839DpTctU
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
7 Jun 2023 2:31 pm
The fruitcake is no liberal. Liberals care about women's rights. Liberals won WWII - they RESIST the government forcing citizens to particpate in medical experiments. Liberals are optimists - he's one of those "the sky is falling" leftist fruits. Liberals believe in free speech - his kind believe in "hate" speech and "hate" crimes. His kind believe in assigning impure motives by fiat and punishing the motive over the act, making the same crime one thing for you and another for them, based on what they DEEM to be your impure motive. Therefore, if a black man beats my skull in, it's because hard upbringing. If I beat his skull in, it's because racism. Same act - two crimes, as their view of the law respects persons over actions and punishes skin color over behavior. The prosecutors that represent his team will, in many cases, refuse to prosecute violent and egregious behaviors by minorities - while enforcing the letter of the law to the last jot and tittle on law-abiding citizens, straining to make petty infractions felonies for show trials.
Liberals respect Kyle Rittenhouse's courage and idealism. His kind seethe against Kyle's decency and bravery, insisting that he is a racist alt right nazi murderer who got away with it because murka is cis stomach ray ciss.
Liberals are HORRIFIED that the election was stolen for biden and he appointed insane cross dressers to important positions, humiliating murka in the eyes of the world.
He's no liberal. He's a **** fruitcake cultist who cosigns broad-shouldered men shouldering broads to take their sports scholarships and records away from them. He's a misogynistic racist **** who believes the sky is falling and what we need to do is thin the herd - and be very clear: the very act of thinning the herd immediately presages eugenics. It outright requires it.
He's closer to a nazi than a liberal, in every measurable way.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
7 Jun 2023 2:55 pm
Explain this comment. ^Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, so now you reveal your true colors: you are a racist.
First, how do you know I am not black? Black people use that word extensively, and are virtually never designated racist for doing so.
Second, how do you know that I have not mastered Ebonics, which we are assured by Harvard professors of Race-Pimping is a legitimate language of its own? Nigga and *** are both words so EXTENSIVELY used in Ebonics that one simply cannot speak Ebonics without employing them on occasion. And EVERY legitimate language is legitimate to learn and use, fruitcake.
Third, why do you assume I don't have a brother card? Maybe I know - and am good friends with - enough plate-lipped Delanamores to have earned the right to use that word as a white fella.
Fourth, how can you be sure I do not IDENTIFY as a porch monkey? If I IDENTIFY as black, that means I am black. Respect my pronouns, mother ****. Live by your creed. If identifying as a woman gets me entry to your mother's public shower and your sister's sports, jackwad, then identifying as a nigro gets me some jungle juice.
And finally, how can the same act POSSIBLY be okay for one citizen and not for another? How can it be that I must hear that word at outrageous decibals on a regular basis, simply because I drive on our public roadways; and yet, if I SAY it - notwithstanding I have no choice but to HEAR it, regularly, accompaied by bone-vibrating bass, - then I am a ray ciss?
Explain that for me, please. And PLEASE - use AI. We've seen YOUR work and found it wanting.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
7 Jun 2023 3:12 pm
Investigation, ****, NOT indictment. The last one ended in a hung DEMOCRAT jury, and no additional effort to retry it happened.Prospero » 06 Jun 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, really? I guess that is why Dem Sen, Bob Menendez is under indictment
Bob Menendez: New Jersey Democratic senator under federal investigation again | CNN Politics
You really should adhere to that old adage; 'look before you shoot, lest you shoot yourself in the foot'.
You may now remove your foot from your mouth.
WHY are you so EFFING STUPID?? Grow up.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
7 Jun 2023 6:40 pm
WHATEVER?
YOUR PROBLEM IS YOU'RE FULL OF A LOT OF LEFTIST HOT-AIR.
NON-SENSICAL GIBBERISH THAT CAN BE SUMMED UP IN A PARAGRAPH.
7 Jun 2023 7:47 pm
Prospero » 01 Jun 2023, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Question: Does the Presidential Records Act authorize the president to declassify documents at will, without a formal process, even by the President 'thinking it' (as Trump claimed)?
Answer: No, the Presidential Records Act (PRA) does not authorize the president to declassify documents at will or by simply thinking it. The PRA is a federal law that governs the management and preservation of presidential records generated during a president's time in office. It establishes that presidential records are the property of the United States government and should be preserved and made available to the public after a certain period.
Declassification of documents, on the other hand, falls under the authority of executive orders and other statutes specifically related to classification and declassification. The president does have the authority to declassify certain documents, but this power is typically exercised through established processes and procedures. The specific procedures for declassifying documents can vary depending on the nature of the information, the agencies involved, and the applicable executive orders or statutes.
It is important to note that even though the president has the authority to declassify documents, this authority is not unlimited. There are still considerations of national security, ongoing investigations, and other factors that may restrict or limit the declassification of certain information.
Question: Which law states that it is illegal to remove national defense information documents from their secure locations.?
Answer: This is the Espionage Act of 1917, which encompasses various provisions related to the mishandling, removal, or disclosure of national defense information. Under this act, it is illegal to remove national defense documents from their secure locations without authorization.
Question: What is the DOJ policy regarding prosecuting those who take them inadvertently but who do return them when the government requests them returned? [This is the case with Biden and Pence]
Answer: Regarding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) policy on prosecuting individuals [Biden and Pence] who inadvertently take national defense information but later return it when requested by the government, it ultimately depends on the specific circumstances and facts of each case. Generally, the DOJ considers factors such as intent, willfulness, and the overall impact of the actions [i.e., the DNI damage assessments] when deciding whether to prosecute. In cases where the individual's actions were unintentional, and they promptly return the documents when requested, the DOJ may exercise discretion and determine that prosecution is not warranted. However, this is a decision made on a case-by-case basis.
Question: What is the DOJ Policy regarding prosecuting those who knowingly, wilfully, though with a mistaken understanding of the Presidential Records Act, and use deceptive tactics to avoid returning them when the Government requests them by subpoena? [This is the case with Trump]
Answer: Regarding the DOJ's policy on prosecuting individuals who knowingly and willfully avoid returning national defense documents when requested by subpoena, the DOJ takes a more serious view. If someone knowingly and willfully disregards a subpoena and uses deceptive tactics to avoid returning the documents, they may face criminal charges for obstruction of justice or contempt of court, depending on the specific circumstances. The DOJ generally views such actions as serious offenses, as they undermine the legal process and hinder the government's ability to conduct investigations.
In my view, given recent events surrounding Trump and NDI docs, Trump's goose is cooked.
You are simply another example of a media fed **** idiot.
7 Jun 2023 8:04 pm
Who knew that when you got caught lying, that you would double down.Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ Well, let's see now, your whine is that only Republicans are getting prosecuted. The appropriate response is that
if you are worried about Republicans getting prosecuted then you should stop electing criminals.
So, if anyone should apologize, Golfboy, you and the Republicans should apologize for electing Donald Trump and his criminal associates.
I mean, history confirms that in the White House, no group has committed more crimes than Republicans, noting that this chart was crafted only 1.8 years into his presidency, there have been more indictments since then, and more to come.:
So, let's see if you are man enough to apologize
for the White House crimes of the right.
I'll be waiting.
The amusing part of your little chart is that it proves MY point, instead of yours.
Why am I not surprised you didn't realize that?
7 Jun 2023 8:05 pm
Instead of apologizing, he doubled down, and then posted a image of prosecution rates of Presidents by party.
Proving MY point, not his.
8 Jun 2023 1:34 am
Oh, I saw that. The moron NEEDS that AI - he is utterly clueless.golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Instead of apologizing, he doubled down, and then posted a image of prosecution rates of Presidents by party.
Proving MY point, not his.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
8 Jun 2023 6:04 am
Your point is that Republicans are wrongfully getting indicted and that the gov is giving dems a pass..golfboy » 07 Jun 2023, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Who knew that when you got caught lying, that you would double down.
The amusing part of your little chart is that it proves MY point, instead of yours.
Why am I not surprised you didn't realize that?
No, the chart does not prove that point. It does prove that Republicans are commuting the bulk of the WH crimes.
Learn how to interpret raw data correctly.
8 Jun 2023 6:12 am
8 Jun 2023 6:47 am
NO turdbrain, what the CHART PROVES is that REPUBLICANS will GO AFTER ANY CRIMINAL, regardless of party, and you DEMOCRATS never prosecute ANYONE because of PARTY as long as its one of your own!!Prospero » 08 Jun 2023, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ Your point is that Republicans are wrongfully getting indicted and that the gov is giving dems a pass..
No, the chart does not prove that point. It does prove that Republicans are commuting the bulk of the WH crimes.
Learn how to interpret raw data correctly.
Sucks you are so stupid you can't seem to fathom that in Democrat world, there are 2 sets of prosecutorial standards. ONE where ANY Republican gets hauled into court and ALL DEMOCRAT crooks get a pass.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
8 Jun 2023 11:46 am
He doesn't need that AI, it is even more clueless than he is... the AI told him they got him now...Cannonpointer » 08 Jun 2023, 1:34 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I saw that. The moron NEEDS that AI - he is utterly clueless.
In memory of Pumpkins
8 Jun 2023 1:01 pm
It's like a monkey with dynamite - not good for society, not good for the monkey.Jantje_Smit » 08 Jun 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't need that AI, it is even more clueless than he is... the AI told him they got him now...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
8 Jun 2023 1:03 pm
I think the fruitloop bailed.
He's been here before. He'll be here again.
They come with a fresh sok and a fresh gleam in their eyes, from time to time. They get humiliated, they flee, they stew, they lurk, they study, they return - lather, rinse, repeat...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 5729 users online :: 8 registered, 16 bots, and 5705 guests
Bots: NING, Adsbot, okhttp, proximic, ADmantX, MicroMessenger, Pinterest, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, bingbot, curl/7